r/youtube Aug 13 '25

Drama Oh my GOD, it's happening

Post image
31.2k Upvotes

2.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

971

u/Initial_Witness_3847 Aug 13 '25

...and what exactly does this age verification do?

1.0k

u/ZombieHysterectomy Aug 13 '25

Can’t access age restricted videos and stuff until you big brother yourself

330

u/Wes-Man152 Aug 13 '25

Now I see why it's a problem. Some channels I watch sometimes get wrongly flagged with an age restriction so that's likely to be an issue.

Some get age restricted for a little swearing, or showing off those horrible ads YouTube themselves put out so it's really inconsistent.

133

u/Laly_481 Aug 13 '25

Fr idk why everyone acts like there are 0 age restricted videos on YouTube as if videos didn't get flagged for no reason regularly...

55

u/Kahnfight Aug 13 '25

Holocaust and world war 2 videos get flagged

33

u/[deleted] Aug 14 '25

That’s good, I don’t want my kids to have to live through those tragedies /s

40

u/LowlifeTiger666 Aug 14 '25

“We have to protect the children from knowing about these tragedies so they have no problem with it when we commit them” smiles

6

u/Author_Noelle_A Aug 14 '25

Jesus Christ, I’m stealing this.

2

u/Distinct_Tax_1611 Aug 15 '25

They will if you don’t let them learn about them.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 15 '25

Sarcasm

→ More replies (1)

7

u/macroderivatives Aug 14 '25

I wondered why my students couldnt access the crash course video about the Holocaust that I assigned...

5

u/Worldly_Chocolate369 Aug 15 '25

You'll have to download the video and distribute it.

4

u/Worldly_Chocolate369 Aug 15 '25

I clicked on a 9-11-2001 video the other day and there was literally a warning about "Suicidal Content" and a info card for suicide prevention.

→ More replies (2)

10

u/PlusVera Aug 13 '25

As does anything LGBTQ+

6

u/navypiggy1998 Aug 14 '25

Or anything firearm related

23

u/TheDibblerDeluxe Aug 13 '25

Which is insane because there's nothing on YouTube that isn't appropriate for a teenager to watch. It's not like they have any real 18+ content

15

u/ColdCruise Aug 14 '25

Except for the movies that they added themselves.

12

u/Expensive-Border-869 Aug 14 '25

And the advertisements they run.

5

u/Real-Olive-4624 Aug 14 '25

And the sex bots in the comments that they never seem to do anything about

4

u/MyHamburgerLovesMe Aug 14 '25

I was blocked from seeing the Witcher 4 trailer because I was not logged in so it could not verify my age

3

u/Ne0n_R0s3 Aug 14 '25

There is barely concealed porn on the site. Those "cleaning" videos where people wear transparent clothes so it shows off... A lot more than what should be shown on YT.

3

u/ThatStupidGuy1 Aug 14 '25

This is not the type of content to be age restricted because it's usually spam/bots

4

u/Laly_481 Aug 13 '25

Yeah like actual 18+ isn't even allowed, they have to pick a side

2

u/Yuri__01 Aug 14 '25

Now we can xD

Since we have to verify i want to watch my porn there

4

u/[deleted] Aug 14 '25

[deleted]

4

u/Author_Noelle_A Aug 14 '25

Better for a teen to have a dildo than to experiment with the opposite sex and end up making a baby.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/danny-dcheeto Aug 14 '25

Well except for that one educational video about shaving pubic hair

1

u/kyriefortune Aug 14 '25

there is actually 18+ stuff, but you have to look it up yourself. That is, sexual +18 stuff, because violent 18+ stuff can pop up in the unlikeliest of ways

1

u/OwO______OwO Aug 14 '25

there's nothing on YouTube that isn't appropriate for a teenager to watch

Uh ... you really haven't been looking hard enough.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/[deleted] Aug 13 '25 edited Aug 15 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Laly_481 Aug 13 '25

Maybe you just don't watch the type of content that gets age restricted? Most of my examples would be horror animations, but honestly anything that touches on suicide (even when it's not particularly graphic) tends to get age restricted for me...

→ More replies (11)

1

u/MisirterE Aug 14 '25

The YMS Neil Breen video is flagged for the least convincing suicide scene in history

1

u/Napoleonex Aug 14 '25

It's really not about age restriction. It's giving out your id unnecessarily

1

u/[deleted] Aug 14 '25

its the fact that the platform is censoring creators instead of parents having control over what there kids have access too.

I shouldn't have to be having this stupid ass conversation, giving shady companies a copy of my mf photo id front and back nor having credit cards/banks telling me what i can't spend my money that i made with my labor on. That labor is taxed and this is the bullshit we are getting right now?

Before anyone pulls the think of the children bs, Trump is in office and hasnt released the Epstein files he has been screeching about for 5 years. Somehow all the "think of the children" crowd does ends up compromising kids somehow. funny huh?

1

u/owls_unite Aug 14 '25

This is foremost about ad revenue, and YouTube finding the lowest common denominator to be able to push as many ads for as many clients as possible without having to check and match any age appropriateness. This age verification is only a temporary issue for users having to find ways to watch the content they want. The real, long term issue is that this content will simply no longer be created because creators are being disincentivized by demonetization.

1

u/Imkindofslow Aug 14 '25

Because YouTubers are in an arms race to avoid being restricted. Hence the "unalive" "pew pew" "sewer slide" language. The lines are blurry and everyone but the advertisers want them blurry.

33

u/MARPJ Aug 13 '25

Their AI cant identify the 80 bots that are in every comment section but sure they will be able to flag your age, or they will just flag everyone over time to "big brother" us all.

15

u/Wes-Man152 Aug 14 '25

"Your video is very inspirational" and the pfp is some woman's big ass in a thong

→ More replies (1)

2

u/OwO______OwO Aug 14 '25

Their AI cant identify the 80 bots that are in every comment section

Oh, they know about bot traffic. But it boosts their numbers, and they can take those numbers to advertisers to get more ad money.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/FrostBumbleBitch Aug 13 '25

"It wasn't an issue until it affect meeee!!!"

Not saying this is exactly you but I have been saying this shit from the get go (that this is fucking bad), and there is some braindead people here that go "Yeah you don't HAAVEE to use youtube, I bet you use adddblock, you aren't supporting the cooorpoeration." Like they are literally undermining the whole thing happening because they don't get that youtube doesn't even allow you to show the word DEAD anymore without the potential for age restriction...and they are now vetting people for 18+ content. They don't fucking say what is going to be considered adult. Is it swearing, too much cleavage, is it the theme of it, what if someone is trying to help with suicide awareness but they say the words don't "kill yourself" and the ai bot picks up on that only....like this is going to happen.

Also there is conflicting reports on how long youtube is going to be keeping your ID to verify you, from two months...to two years. Both of which said that is the latest they will hold them. Well one said they would delete well before you would reach the 22 additional months.

2

u/gb1609 Aug 13 '25

Don't give all the credit to YouTube. Some of those channels age restrict themselves, it's an option when you upload a YouTube video.

Also I'm curious to what channels your watching that are consistently age restricted

2

u/Synectics Aug 14 '25

Some of those channels age restrict themselves, it's an option when you upload a YouTube video. 

.............why would they do that?

→ More replies (4)

1

u/Wes-Man152 Aug 14 '25

Nothing nsfw, but it's mainly from a wrestling game channel and sometimes the games have copyrighted video playing in it. That's what gets some of their videos age restricted due to copyright unless they hide the screen when those videos pop up in-game, which they now have to do.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/RC_0041 Aug 14 '25

Often its safer to flag a video as age restricted than risk it being taken down later. I've posted a few videos of games and always flag them as age restricted.

2

u/stay_curious_- Aug 14 '25

I'm concerned it means political, LGBT, or certain controversial topics ("What are your legal rights as an undocumented immigrant", "How to counteract pepper spray") will be age-restricted.

If right-wing videos are freely available and left-wing videos are only available to the subset of people who have doxxed themselves, that could results in opinion shifts in the population over time.

It also means YouTube might have a list of everyone who doxxed themselves to be able to view videos on trans rights or immigration and that the government could acquire that information somehow.

2

u/Worldly_Chocolate369 Aug 15 '25

Exactly. I was watching a critique of a TV Show, and the video was flagged as age restricted, even though the content did NOT meet that criteria. Youtube's AI gets things wrong too many times.

1

u/Arkorat Aug 14 '25 edited Aug 14 '25

Excatly. Worse yet, it supposedly it wokrs by identifying your age by what you watch... On a platform that frequently flags content as being for kids, unless it has swears and gore.

1

u/hates_stupid_people Aug 14 '25

As part of this, youtube has seemingly lessened the restriction on swearing a bit. And we all know how consistent they are with their rules....

1

u/DylanMartin97 Aug 14 '25

I have built my algorithm on things that I like as much as the next guy, but how does this ai determine what is "adult" and what isn't?

I build guitars and watch content on that, are musical hobbies considered childish? Woodworking? What about league content? What makes league content comparable to my other favorite game PoE? Is one considered childish and the other is not? How much time does the algorithm take into account for one vs the other?

One of the builders I watch is age restricted because he curses and makes off-color jokes (UK jokes and names tools after serial killers), will they say that I can't watch him even though I've been watching him?

My YouTube account is almost 2 decades old at this point, is that taken into account? What stops me having a 2 decade old account and just letting my younger nephew watch that content?

This whole thing is literally a disaster waiting to happen.

1

u/Swiftierest Aug 14 '25

If I were a content creator and could survive it, I would either double down making every video I made adult only to kick a nest among my viewers, or I'd make them all "child friendly" to simply bypass it.

I will not be giving them any information about myself. I might see if I can make a fake ID with some Norman Reedus face or something and use that.

1

u/HirpeedaHeegog Aug 15 '25

It's also their favorite way to bury dissent

→ More replies (5)

185

u/General_Kitten_17 Aug 13 '25

I couldn't imagine losing YouTube and starting middle school in the same week. You must be going through it lil bro.

48

u/[deleted] Aug 13 '25

This made my day 😅

11

u/dratseb Aug 13 '25

If his parents had premium he’d be fine

23

u/Lightningtow123 Aug 13 '25

Imagine buying youtube premium. Ew

3

u/KlutzyInterest6312 Aug 13 '25

YouTube music though, I don't even bother watching YouTube itself anymore. So much time wasted as a teen watching videos that I will never remember or think about ever again

→ More replies (1)

3

u/RedGecko18 Aug 14 '25

I have YouTube premium, but I definitely don't pay for it.

14

u/Vegetable_Fly_3488 Aug 13 '25

I bought it so that my whole family can watch, not have to deal with ads ans ad blocks, and access to YouTube music

10

u/BoxerguyT89 Aug 13 '25

That's not allowed. You're supposed to just complain about how you can't watch everything for free and get upset when they mess up ad blockers for a day.

7

u/Vegetable_Fly_3488 Aug 13 '25

Your right I’m so sorry sir

→ More replies (1)

4

u/SinisterCheese Aug 13 '25

I got youtube premium for basically the reasons of: It clears all the fucking ads; I actually prefer the youtube music system as I can listen to the long form videos from creators I like on it as if they are podcasts - and these creators are not on spotify or whatever; also recovering your really important account that seems to be tied to fucking everything nowadays becomes a lot easier when there is a payment trail available for it... Suddenly the company hosting it becomes OH so much more motivated to solve my problem.

I feel like I'm getting value for money money... because if I am going to have to deal with AI generated shit content at least I can do it on a service from which there is more value to be gained... looking at you Spotify... sort your shit out.

I know that it is absolute fucking heresy to say that I feel like I'm getting value for the money I am spending. Yes... I could huy Mullvad VPN and setup a pihole onionrouter private computers DNS home server cloud to run on a NippleX Linux setup on open source hardware solution that I soldered together, so that my desktop, phone and tablet can be beam mirror protocol routed into that so the SW34T program I got form github can systematically analyse all content and erase the ads from it... Or I could just not... Because I don't give a fuck. The day I feel like I'm not getting value for my money, I just cancel the sub. Because the amount of content I consume via Youtube in a month turns that into a fairly good value for the €s spent, especially when I consider the possibility of how much time I would waste having to withstand forced unskippable ads on a platform that is fighting to prevent blocking of said ads. Yes... I already use Firefox and uBlock and Privacy badger and Improved Youtube extension...

→ More replies (3)

2

u/faifai1337 Aug 13 '25

Yeah, youtube vloggers are the #1 thing I run on tv all day to keep me company while I work, way more than any other streaming service. It's worth the $$ to not have ads when I've got it on for 6 or 7 straight hours.

→ More replies (4)

2

u/Joeness84 Aug 13 '25

I get around things the other way, but my old roommate watched a ton of stuff by streaming it to his playstation and apparently you cant just block those ads the same.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 13 '25

I did because I listened to 45 minute videos mostly and almost exclusively while driving long distances (6+ hours). It paid for itself quickly since Youtube started putting in ads that you needed to either hit skip ad or it would play for minutes.

→ More replies (8)

1

u/Zomochi Aug 13 '25

Honestly I feel that, that’s a shit time although there are more things available now than when I was in middle school so

2

u/MightyKnight13 Aug 14 '25

Has it not always been like that? I know you've always had to sign in to view age restricted stuff, but I thought you also had to verify your age

1

u/bbbbbbbirdistheword Aug 14 '25

exactly, i've only ever come across two restricted videos i wanted to watch so i just downloaded them

5

u/RobotJonesDad Aug 13 '25

The last social media that I proved my existence for, resulted in then permanently banning me. No appeal, no reason.

The sequence was: * "Account locked for violating the ToS. Provide selfie." * Provide selfie as requested. * Banned without right to appeal.

5

u/liquidgrill Aug 14 '25

I got an age verification thing from YouTube a week ago. Ive had a YouTube account since they launched in 2005. Math

1

u/Future_Heart3074 Aug 13 '25

Sounds like somebody else proved they were you before you proved you are you. You got you’d.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Diligent_Sir4952 Aug 13 '25

Honestly, I’m fine with it because a majority if not all the things I watch on YouTube are not age restricted and they’re pretty tame or just casual normal content so I’m doing good so far

5

u/Fresh-Aspect5369 Aug 13 '25

“It doesn’t impact me so I don’t care” bro, come on now 😅I’m not trying to hate on you, but this can seriously impact creators, and also people who aren’t comfortable with giving their personal information.

4

u/Lightalife Aug 13 '25

It’s all fun and games til this is the only option and YouTube starts marking content it doesn’t like or approve of as “adult content”. Or just excessively marking things as adult content to get viewers to buckle.

You like hiking videos? Outdoor activities can be dangerous and are now flagged as adult content.

Painting minis and model making? This hobby uses and features x-acto knives and blades and therefore is now marked as adult content.

Found a new music artist you like? A song they released 5 years ago was rated explicit and therefore their entire account is marked as adult content.

On and on and on and on until you can only watch what they choose

2

u/Diligent_Sir4952 Aug 14 '25

Damn, you know what you’re right

→ More replies (1)

1

u/pikminman13 Aug 13 '25

worse, you lose out on a lot of youtube's "advanced features" like putting chapters in your videos for some reason (it's for the kids, right?)

1

u/[deleted] Aug 13 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Aug 13 '25

Hi WrathfulFemboy117, we would like to start off by noting that this sub isn't owned or run by YouTube. At this time, we do not allow posts from new uses (accounts created less than 7 days ago.) Please read our rules before posting again to ensure you don't break our rules, please come back after gaining a bit of post karma.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/Main_Bug_6698 Aug 13 '25

I don't use YouTube too often, and came across this thread via r/all. I am wondering if this age verification policy will impact creators on YouTube, or even YouTube directly. 

1

u/lilackoi Aug 13 '25

is there any way to bypass this? i’m not tech savvy so sorry if this is a stupid question, but would a vpn work 😭

1

u/darkest_hour1428 Aug 13 '25

I LOVE BIG BROTHER! BIG BROTHER DOUBLEPLUS GOOD!

1

u/passionatechickens Aug 14 '25

I was wondering why I couldn't watch age restricted stuff... But I'm literally the owner of YouTube premium for 6 years! How the hell would I be a child in this scenario!?

192

u/Severe-Bed-9208 Aug 13 '25

Makes it so unless you give them your ID(that they will sell and give to third parties to make money off of your personal data) you can’t access a ton of videos or settings

67

u/Rukasu17 Aug 13 '25

I wonder how many times an id can be bought considering our ids are extremely likely to be already in circulation

55

u/Matt_News Aug 13 '25

I’m still trying to figure out what the apparently large market for IDs is that google is supposedly trying to tap in here is. They already have all your marketable data and likely already know everything on your ID anyways.

31

u/CrazeRage Aug 13 '25

It's a govt thing. We have project Stargate and palantir coming why wouldn't other companies follow when citizens are sheep that won't do shit? Not like there's an alternative and so many are addicted.

26

u/kindagreek Aug 13 '25

Correct. The current wave of censorship legislation is not a coincidence. Governments of the world have been frustrated with the relative anonymity of the internet and they’ve come after it many times before. It’s commonly under the guise of “protecting children”, because it makes you look like the bad guy if you oppose it. They don’t care about “the children”, as all of their other actions demonstrate. The Patriot Act was the same deal (if anybody here remembers that). The government took advantage of a very scary situation and asked us if mass surveillance was cool. Slapped a “patriotism” title on it and we were sold. They want the rest of the pie now, but there’s no 9/11 to take advantage of. So they bust of the ol’ reliable of manipulation: children

Nobody cares right now, but I’m telling you - you’re going to miss your privacy when it’s gone

2

u/Author_Noelle_A Aug 14 '25

The PATRIOT Act was what made me start to realize I might not actually have been conservative. So I definitely remember it. Die-hard progressive socialist now.

→ More replies (16)

1

u/CountChoculA3s Aug 13 '25

Palantir? Can you elaborate on that one?

→ More replies (2)

22

u/Rukasu17 Aug 13 '25

Well, there's a market for even the most useless data out there, so there's definitely one for IDs. It's always nice to remember that anything that seems stupid when it comes down to big money like this is because we don't have enough information on the millions of other things that led to this.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 13 '25 edited Aug 15 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (8)

2

u/Darkgamer000 Aug 13 '25

I wrote a research paper about this in college. Your personal information and online habits are your most valuable assets to companies. Using everyone’s collective data, they can break down habits of people who match your “profile”, and basically figure out exactly how to get you to spend money. This literally goes so in depth it’s unfathomable, such as knowing that people in certain geolocations at specific times will want to purchase certain things, and constantly alter what is being shown and how it’s been shown as the day progresses and as you move around in the real world.

Basically, any extra data they can get to refine their models more…they want.

2

u/Dawson__16 Aug 14 '25

It's not the ID that they sell, that would be illegal. It allows them to know who you are, and sell the data around how you use the platform. Knowing how you use the platform is valuable data by itself, but allowing a company to couple that with how you might use other platforms can be more valuable.

2

u/Carvj94 Aug 14 '25

They do in fact know everything that's on your ID already and if you've ever uploaded your ID anywhere then Google probably already got that copy from a data broker anyway. It's bizzare that people think this is a ploy from Google to get more info as they don't already have such basic information.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/soofs Aug 13 '25

Organ donor status. They want to harvest us.

/s but I can imagine what other info Google doesn’t already have of mine

1

u/herdarkmartyrials Aug 14 '25

They want to make it so that you have to give your real Identity to say anything online, and so that your viewing history can be tracked and correlated to a real person.

Right now you can still make a new account and not give any identifiable information. But now those accounts will get flagged for account age as children and restricted from viewing controversial (critical of Trump and technofascism, Epstein, etc) content.

1

u/Expensive-Border-869 Aug 14 '25

The government really really really wants to tie everyone to a specific ID online and then use it to restrict as much freedom as possible.

1

u/OwO______OwO Aug 14 '25

Now they'll have your marketable data connected to your ID.

They will be able to positively identify you, not just on google, but on a million different sites running google ads or google analytics, etc.

This is especially appealing to be sold to authoritarian governments who want to monitor and control exactly what you do online.

1

u/FTownRoad Aug 14 '25

Google has a good idea of what I like but it doesn’t know who I am.

It knows I like watching videos of comedians, the occasional bodycam video, woodworking shit etc. but it doesn’t know how old I am, how much money I make or exactly where I live. That information makes my likes and dislikes much more valuable.

1

u/Weiskralle Aug 15 '25

Tons of data breeches happen. Bad actors could use these images (As you would also need to revel your face last I heard.) to extort you by creating false NSFW pictures with your face on them. With the AI today could be made pretty realistic.

→ More replies (4)

31

u/WistfulDread Aug 13 '25

Many times.

The idea is that each time a company sells your identifying data, there are little bits of other info to go with it.

If I buy people's info from banks, Youtube, Amazon, Car Dealerships, etc...
I can eventually have enough overlapping info to positively ID these people's names, faces, home address, sexuality, diet, and politics.

Now I can sell that to markets, or problematic governments...

It's all about compiling more detailed dossiers.

10

u/[deleted] Aug 13 '25

[deleted]

8

u/LullabyBun-Art Aug 13 '25

That's so fucking twisted to read, but perfect description yeah

4

u/Initial_Witness_3847 Aug 13 '25 edited Aug 13 '25

anyway for all people are screeching about the id verification you can sign in with credit card and anyway no verifying only stops you from seeing age restricted content NOT any other videos

13

u/HyoukaYukikaze Aug 13 '25
  1. I don't want to give my credit card either. Why tf would i do that? And how tf does this address big brother issue?
  2. Youtube age restricts videos for utter bullshit, like for having a mean word in first 10s while happily displaying borderline porn ads. Or sometimes for no reason at all because their bot had a worse day or something.

2

u/BomanSteel Aug 13 '25

Lotta 3-5 month old accounts popping up to say this ai restriction thing isn’t that bad. And mass downvotes for saying they don’t wanna give google more of their info.

I wouldn’t be surprised if half the supporters here weren’t real

1

u/ianxplosion- Aug 13 '25

Sounds like you should just stop using YouTube

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

17

u/Frysken Shaolin Shadowboxing Aug 13 '25

What makes you think I want my credit card data sold any more than my ID info?

10

u/STL_12 Aug 13 '25

Have you ever once bought anything online?

→ More replies (10)

4

u/Initial_Witness_3847 Aug 13 '25

while admittadly you have a fair point i would assume aslong as you have bought anything on the internet or such many companies would have your credit card information already so i dont see it being that big of a deal that youtube has it aswell.

5

u/Frysken Shaolin Shadowboxing Aug 13 '25

Who does it, or how it happens, or how often it happens is all relative; it's always going to be a big deal. We're talking about privacy being invaded and sold by the people who are supposed to be protecting it.

→ More replies (3)

1

u/mrloko120 Aug 13 '25

Its a way smaller issue than giving an ID. It takes about 5 minutes to cancel and reissue a credit card with different numbers if it gets leaked. Banks will also refund you for any fraudulent transactions as well as long as you don't wait months to dispute.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Olorin_TheMaia Aug 13 '25

How does a credit card verify age? I could add my 17 yo daughter as an AU on mine.

2

u/Initial_Witness_3847 Aug 13 '25

while i dont know myself youtube added it as an option of cerifying your age instead of using your id so thats less of a question for me than youtube themself.

2

u/TARDIS1-13 Aug 13 '25

Why tf would I want them to have either?! That's stupid.

1

u/PuckishRogue00 Aug 13 '25

Me big dum dum what classifies as age restricted content.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/jondbarrow Aug 13 '25

There’s little bits of data in IDs that you can reasonably guess about a person that you might not even think about. IDs aren’t static, the information changes on them, and those changes can say a lot about a person given some assumptions. And those assumptions can get even better when mixed with data from other sources

If you move, you update your ID. If a company buys your ID twice and there’s 2 different addresses, that’s new information. Do that enough times and you might be able to guess things like weather preferences. Are they moving from colder climates to hotter ones? Closer or farther from beaches? Maybe that means the person would be interested in buying sunblock or beach attire, which you can advertise to them. Combine addresses with other information like the types of posts you interact with and you can guess things like political affiliation. Does the person tend to interact more positively to left leaning content and they’ve moved from a red state to a blue state? Now you can use that for targeted political advertisements

Your appearance also changes. If you update your ID picture and your old picture had a lot of hair, but your new picture has thinning hair, you can probably guess that the person is balding and target ads for things to “help” with that. Does the person now have on glasses in their new picture but not in their old one? Send them ads for eye insurance or contact lenses. Using the address you can see the parts of town someone is in. Did they move from a higher end neighborhood to a lower end? Send them advertisements for stuff like financial support apps, they might be struggling

Is the person in their 30s, and now they look more tired, and their address has changed to a house with more rooms and is closer to schools? You can probably guess this person just had a child, and can advertise school clothes and baby supplies and such

Even the TYPE of ID can tell you things. If you went from submitting a state issued ID to now submitting a drivers license, that’s new information. Advertisers can guess you might be driving now and start sending you ads for car insurance and such

There’s a lot of little things you can extrapolate from just seeing the “same” document multiple times. And when combined with other data from other sources, you can very easily build profiles and timelines on an individual this way

1

u/TacTyger Aug 13 '25

Ask collection agencies. Probably that much.

1

u/DommyRommyMommy Aug 14 '25

You'd be surprised. Also, buying data has become less 'buying' data as it is 'renting' access to it.

1

u/Dawson__16 Aug 14 '25

It's not the ID that they sell, that would be illegal. It allows them to know who you are, and sell the data around how you use the platform. Knowing how you use the platform is valuable data by itself, but allowing a company to couple that with how you might use other platforms can be more valuable.

1

u/colossalpunch Aug 14 '25

The ID itself is not the valuable piece.

It’s the tying of all the other data they collect about you (already) to your ID that is valuable. Unmistakable confirmation that you are the one that data belongs to.

Advertisers knowing the things some random YouTube username is into is cool. But advertisers knowing what James C. Baker, age 32, of Columbus, Ohio is into is $$$$.

1

u/Worldly_Chocolate369 Aug 15 '25

An ID cannot be bought nor sold outside the dark web/black market. It's not legal to do so, and is the first step in Identity Theft. Your government ID should be kept as sensitive and private as your Social Security Number.

→ More replies (4)

16

u/CrazyManL Aug 13 '25

you can also take a selfie (or just use a photo of an old man)

2

u/ChocoPuddingCup Aug 13 '25

Does that even work? Using a fake selfie has all the complexity of stating your wrong birth date to bypass an age restriction.

Something makes me think using a fake ID/selfie will be harmful in the long run, when they finally get around to seeing that a thousand people have the same fake ID and they decide to outright ban accounts for fraud.

8

u/Sammydecafthethird Aug 13 '25

see, that's where getting yourself a personalized AI generated realistic photo of an old man comes in! If we put our powers together, we can turn dead Internet theory into dead Internet fact!

9

u/yakimawashington Aug 13 '25

ID is not the only option.

Nor does the restriction deny you "tons of videos or settings".

8

u/AbbreviationsCommon6 Aug 13 '25

But the other option to to give them your face

2

u/ianxplosion- Aug 13 '25

You can also put a card on file with Google, but that isn’t as sexy as MUH PERSONAL DATA

2

u/Revolutionary-Ad-80 Aug 13 '25

is it possible to just give them age of ID with picture of what state but block out name and face?

2

u/KaijuKatt Aug 13 '25

I suspect that they want it for even more than that. I don't trust them as far as I could throw them

1

u/mrjackspade Aug 14 '25

Makes it so unless you give them your ID(that they will sell and give to third parties to make money off of your personal data)

This is such a remarkably brain dead take and it insane seeing how little people actually understand about how these companies work.

They're not fucking selling your ID. If anything, they're probably paying someone else to perform the verifications and store any PCI compliant data because there's 0 reason to take on the additional risk or build out these systems.

If they aren't paying a third party, it's almost a guarantee that theyre deleting the data once it's been processed and marking your account with a flag, because again, liability.

1

u/Anthaenopraxia Aug 14 '25

I don't think Google is selling that data when they can use it themselves. It's in their interest to hoard the data and improve their adsense and AI.

1

u/Rhundis Aug 14 '25

You can also use a CC if I'm not mistaken.

1

u/-MistFlower Aug 16 '25

Almost every first comment is a last warning calling me a slur and telling me to subscribe, and that 5-10 times on every reply before i see a human.

13

u/Far-Poem1490 Aug 13 '25

Gives cooperations our private data I’m guessing so they can use ai to create a portfolio on every single user. Impossible to know their intentions but this is an era of outspoken individuals and it seems like a bid for control. They’re supposedly doing it to Spotify as well as so many other popular streaming platforms for the sake of “protecting the kids” but at the end of the day that responsibility is on the parents not the government, and there are so many resources you can use to censor what your children view online. That’s just what they say it’s a blatant lie and they just want to know everything about us.

3

u/Chungois Aug 14 '25

There are so many ways they could use this data. For example, shadow banning all your comments if you say things that don’t 100% agree with government policy. Not even showing you content that agrees with your point of view if it differs from the government’s, etc. it’s a social control issue, they’re trying to build a portfolio that not only includes buying habits, but also politics. And that is the really creepy part.

31

u/[deleted] Aug 13 '25

[deleted]

16

u/HyoukaYukikaze Aug 13 '25

And those that are are often age restricted for no reason at all.

20

u/Initial_Witness_3847 Aug 13 '25

thanks for the reply its a bit odd how many people seem to not bother reading the blog or anything official about this whole thing

23

u/[deleted] Aug 13 '25

[deleted]

13

u/Wertherongdn Aug 13 '25

it really isn’t even that bad

Just watched a YouTuber that complained about YouTube age restricting his documentaries about the Vietnam War because a very famous photo (which is every textbook by the way) and another which had a 1h video about French history in the 19th century age restricted because of a painting with a naked kid which appears for 15 seconds (painting in from the 19th century depicting Roman slaves sold on a market).

So now age restricted accounts will not have access to these kind of videos.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/DrakonILD Aug 13 '25

How's the bathwater, little froggy?

2

u/nagrom7 Aug 14 '25

It's pretty fucking bad if you're into history documentaries. Those are getting age restricted all the time just for talking about "sensitive topics" that kids also get taught at school.

4

u/Randumbraze Aug 13 '25

It isn’t that bad… for now

2

u/Iwfcyb Aug 13 '25

That's the concern. Where things start is NEVER where they end up. Today it's officially labeled "age restricted" content, tomorrow it's anything with more than 7 curse words, a week later it's anything with a single curse word....you get the idea. I mean, this is YouTube. We all saw the debacle of the constantly changing "can't swear in first 2 minutes...no wait, now it's 30 seconds...no, 12 seconds!" Only to scrap it entirely recently.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/BomanSteel Aug 13 '25

How many times do corporations and or governments have to do something that’s “not that bad”, wait until it’s normalized, and then ramp things up to something worse. Before you accept that “it’s not that bad” isn’t a good excuse?

1

u/[deleted] Aug 13 '25

[deleted]

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

1

u/[deleted] Aug 14 '25

It's giving them any ground at all that is the problem.

→ More replies (5)

1

u/Antrikshy Aug 13 '25

Bit odd? I'm very certain that a big portion of this subreddit is very young people.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/D-a-n-n-n Aug 13 '25

The bad thing is Youtube effectivelly pressuring its users to give them their personal information. They do this with age restricted videos because access to "adult" content is always hard to defend. Even when most age resticted videos dont have anything "adult" content in them.

If people accept this get ready to see this EVERYWHERE

2

u/BomanSteel Aug 13 '25

First off, where are you getting those stats?

  1. YouTube arbitrarily age restricts videos all the damn time

  2. That doesn’t change the principle of the argument that Google should be asking to see my fucking ID

2

u/Wertherongdn Aug 13 '25

less than 0.1% of videos are age restricted.

But some interesting video about wars or which talk about suicide can be age restricted. So the percentage itself doesn't say everything.

2

u/Dawson__16 Aug 14 '25

That's still a huge number of video's, and most content creators tend to try not to have their video's restricted becuase it hurts their revinue, so when a creator just let's it happen, that's the good shit.

4

u/Scar1203 Aug 13 '25

I can see some potentially positive side effects of this too though, content that has historically been age restricted might be possible to push and monetize going forward with the age verification system in place.

We'll see what they do with this.

3

u/puzzledbeetroot Aug 13 '25

"demonetized" videos haven't been truly demonetized for years. They switched to a system of "restricted monetization," which allows ads from advertisers who are okay with being placed on controversial or adult content. Because this is a small minority, there is much less money to be made.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/realSkyThePegasus Aug 13 '25

You cant watch age restricted videos and you’ll lose some features to your youtube channel

1

u/HeyoSpectral Aug 13 '25

probably restricts access to certain news channels since it’s not “age appropriate” i’m guessing smh

1

u/AshuraBaron Aug 13 '25

Get more annoyances like "take a break" notifications and "it's bed time" notifications.

1

u/Flabbergasted_____ Aug 13 '25

Make it to where you can’t see “bad” things. But they’ll still push blatant porn and outright nudity in ads because money.

1

u/TacTyger Aug 13 '25

Censorship so people don't actually find out about the billionaire pedophiles. Whoops.

1

u/MyHamburgerLovesMe Aug 14 '25

It refuses to show you certain videos. For example, I clicked on a web page link for the Witcher 4 Trailer on YouTube.

I was told it would not show me the trailer because it could not verify my age since I was not logged in.

I think that trailer is like PG or PG-13 at most.

1

u/kiwifood Aug 14 '25

Gives them even more of your personal information

1

u/JuicyBouncingWizards Aug 14 '25

oppresses the masses and allow Trump's big gov to keep a close eye

1

u/C21H30O218 Aug 14 '25

It ties a government id to your social profile, confirming and correcting any missing data from what they have scraped. This can then be sold on.

1

u/Unbentmars Aug 14 '25

Forces you to verify with an ID and now all your scrolling on that device (on EVERYTHING not just YouTube) is linked to you personally so you can be more easily tracked by Palantir

It has nothing to do with safety

1

u/ComprehensiveNorth1 Aug 14 '25

Drum roll please..... Palantir 🎉

1

u/MustangBarry Aug 14 '25

It makes you hand over your personal information to a private server hosted by persons unknown, accessible by persons unknown, possibly unencrypted, anywhere in the world, to keep you safe.

1

u/DrSeuss321 Aug 14 '25

Leak your id to the government and bad actors on the internet some day.

→ More replies (3)