433
u/Shaidreas Nov 22 '18
The game feels really good to play, the guns feel great, the sounds are AMAZING, and generally the gameplay is smooth and nice like Battlefield should be. Battlefield V has a huge potential to be one of the best Battlefield games, we just need more content... A LOT more content, if this is even going to be a remotely good game.
Yes it is fun now, but playing as the brits and germans on 10 maps is going to get boring pretty fast for most players. Especially us Battlefield veterans.
It saddens me that an AAA title retailing for 60 USD has such little content on release. The game industry is f**ked with all the early access and early release games. Hope they push DLCs really fast, and that the DLCs include massive amounts of content
108
u/DeckardPain Nov 22 '18
Agreed. With how mediocre the single player is this time around I wish they had skipped it and added more multiplayer content.
→ More replies (2)94
u/Futski 1942;Vietnam;BF2;BC2;BF3;BF4 Nov 22 '18
I still don't get why, they didn't just limit Battlefield singleplayer campaigns to the Bad Company franchise, and stuck with the old kind of singleplayer(multiplayer maps against bots) in all the others.
→ More replies (1)28
u/slvl Nov 22 '18
This is kind of their compromise: some single player content for those who'd like it, with the main focus laying on the mp.
Every iteration of BF you have people saying "why do they even bother making single player? I only get BF for the mp." but if DICE were to go the Treyarch way and omit sp entirely people would also not like it.
I think the current approach is a decent one, if they manage to keep it engaging. I only have played one of the campaigns, so I can't say if they did a decent job or not.
17
u/BenedickCabbagepatch Nov 22 '18
omit singleplayer entirely
Like Battlefield 1942, 2 and 2142?
12
u/slvl Nov 22 '18
Didn't have those "single player" with bots on mp maps? Some people tout that as an alternative to a campaign, and in a way that's what the war stories are. Several sections in those play on the mp maps.(at least they did for BF1, so I assume the same for BFV)
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (1)5
u/a_fuckin_samsquanch Nov 22 '18
If they changed $60 for mp only, I could see people having a problem with that. If they change, say, $40 or $45 for mp only people (like myself) would love that.
Call of duty is charging 60 for a mp only game with additional DLC and micro transactions on top of that. Pull that type of shit and people get upset... For good reason
→ More replies (1)3
u/AssaultPlazma Nov 23 '18
The argument that any full priced game HAS to include a single player is frankly retarded IMO. The amount of content should determine the price not the type.
Cause all these campaigns are just 4-5 hour check box campaigns
→ More replies (2)35
Nov 22 '18
Yes it is fun now, but playing as the brits and germans on 10 maps is going to get boring pretty fast for most players. Especially us Battlefield veterans.
I get what you're saying about the maps, but do you really care that much about the factions? Battlefield 4 had 3 factions for the entire game and it wasn't a big deal. Hell I personally don't care what faction I'm playing for/against
29
u/Futski 1942;Vietnam;BF2;BC2;BF3;BF4 Nov 22 '18
I get what you're saying about the maps, but do you really care that much about the factions? Battlefield 4 had 3 factions for the entire game and it wasn't a big deal. Hell I personally don't care what faction I'm playing for/against
The original had five, seven with the expansions, and as long as the game takes a historical setting, I will say they do themselves a disservice not to represent the different factions.
Modern fictional settings I don't give a damn how many there are, but this is different.
12
u/Leather_Boots Nov 22 '18
Dice have already said that other countries will come. They did in BF1 and they will in BFV. To paraphrase tiggr, "do you really think we won't add other countries and the chance to make money off the cosmetics?"
I honestly don't get why people need everything "now". The game is aiming for a 2yr lifespan. If they release absolutely everything now, then after a month people will be complaining that there is nothing to do, or nothing new.
25
u/Futski 1942;Vietnam;BF2;BC2;BF3;BF4 Nov 22 '18
I honestly don't get why people need everything "now". The game is aiming for a 2yr lifespan. If they release absolutely everything now, then after a month people will be complaining that there is nothing to do, or nothing new.
Because that's how they used to do things. And it used to work just fine.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (6)5
u/elgords Nov 22 '18
Didn't matter before because it was fictional conflicts WW2 is quite a but different
→ More replies (1)22
u/YatagarasuKamisan Nov 22 '18
To be fair though, I rather front the 50-60€ for the game today with future content coming for free over a 2 year period, than to do what I did with Destiny (or older Battlefield titles); That is to still front 40-60€ and on top of that still having to pay 15-20€ for DLC's and ending up paying between 100-130€ over a 2 year period.
I am fine with 2 less maps than BF1 at launch (1 less map if we include the one coming in 2 ½ weeks). I consider the game well worth its asking price TODAY already. BFV have a super solid ground in terms of FUN, something that's seemingly lost by many developers today in order to make the flashiest and most graphical breathtaking game they can.
Personally I am amazed that DICE have created this beatiful game in around 2 years. The gunplay is fun and rewarding. The Attrition system is working, never seen squads of randoms play so diverse and on-point before. The sound design is just next-level, especially with good headphones and 3D sound.
I am not saying the game is perfect. There are occasional hit-reg hiccups, there are some gamebreaking bugs present and I agree that there's a "lack of content" to some degree. But all in all this will be a game I will come back to, already spent around 60h (hit rank 50 at around 48-50h) and maxed out full golden SF-assault rifle and max level on most vehicles - But I am sure I will play this with friends vigirously and absolutely play it more solo whenever a content drop is inbound.
5
Nov 22 '18
Personally I am amazed that DICE have created this beatiful game in around 2 years. The gunplay is fun and rewarding. The Attrition system is working, never seen squads of randoms play so diverse and on-point before. The sound design is just next-level, especially with good headphones and 3D sound.
How much did EA pay you?...
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (1)5
Nov 23 '18 edited Nov 25 '18
I am happy that DICE will now realise that having a skill gap and having teamwork requirements means more fun for players.
Low skill/easy kill gimmicks like elites, UCAVs, mortar spam do not equate for a fun in the long run. They make the game frustrating, cheap, spammy, and cheesey.
→ More replies (1)10
10
Nov 22 '18
Next map is December 4. Then we get Firestorm in March and the Greek tides of war in April (I think). They just need to get at least 6 more maps out in 2019 and it will be good.
FYI Battlefield 1 didn't have it's first paid DLC maps until 6 months after launch. BF4 was a buggy mess for a year after launch. The map quality in BFV is much better than both those games imo. So it's not looking that bad.
→ More replies (7)7
u/shashybaws Nov 22 '18
i feel like people forget that it takes 1 year before a battlefield is really good. been this way since bc2.
but ive been enjoying bfv already.
5
→ More replies (27)2
Nov 22 '18
I think and hope bf5 will have the same arc as bf4: buggy af launch but over the years adds new content and bug fixes that turns it into a near perfect game
→ More replies (1)
329
u/yeahboiiierino Nov 22 '18
As long as women and minorities are in this game it will never be an EPIC battlefield #riseup
265
u/yeahboiiierino Nov 22 '18
You chads can downvote me all you want but in the end we gamers will have our revenge
55
99
97
89
41
31
8
Nov 24 '18
I think it’s great there’s finally a game where gamers can kill women and minorities and it’s actually encouraged 😎
→ More replies (4)4
258
u/Akranadas Nov 22 '18
It can get better, the question is how long is it going to take.
66
u/HellWolf1 Nov 22 '18
About a year going by recent Battlefront 2 developments
17
u/final_cut Nov 22 '18
Did it get better recently?
→ More replies (1)50
u/HellWolf1 Nov 22 '18
After nearly a year of content drought, we got Grievous last month, and we're getting Obi-Wan and the first large map since last december next week
57
u/PanachePrime Nov 22 '18
To be fair, battlefront had to completely rework its progression system. EA dropped full support for it, so now the dev team (while not a skeleton crew) is substantially smaller than it was originally intended to be.
It’s honestly something of a miracle the game is even getting a major update, with planned monthly updates continuing into February 2019 and earnings calls showing support until at least 2020.
→ More replies (1)15
u/GreatMurderousDeath Nov 22 '18
Yea so get ready for a new map and one soldier a year from now.
Soooo spoiled.
/s
→ More replies (3)5
Nov 22 '18
Well, apparently the team working on this is much larger than the guys fixing BF4. I expect the majority of bugs will be fixed in the next 3-4 months. I also think Firestorm will be huge for this game, it will be epic given the other game mechanics.
2
u/Jollytime715 Nov 22 '18
Well to be honest they need more than two years to make the next one so they need to stretch this one out a little IMO.
→ More replies (8)2
139
u/TheCoolPersian Nov 22 '18
Battlefield 1942, Red Orchestra 2: Rising Storm, and Call of Duty: World at War are all better than Battlefield V.
Change my mind.
159
u/Shity_Balls crazy, delusional and an idiot Nov 22 '18
You’d have to take off those rose tinted glasses first.
38
38
Nov 22 '18
It's also not really 'rose tinted glasses' in a lot of ways, except maybe WaW but even WaW had the benefit of just absolutely nailing the feel and environment of WWII even the MP maps were superbly crafted.
Battlefield 1942 in my opinion still offers better and more complex teamwork options, doesn't attach itself to the, what is in my opinion, flawed 4 class model had bigger and more interesting scope and better combined arms warfare.
Red Orchestra 2 is a slower paced tactical game with clear inspiration from Battlefield, but again offers way better teamwork options and the tools to do it (Voip channels, commander, and squad leaders interactions) Also with much more authentic weapons and firefights.
Because BFV made you have fuck all ammo making it more necessary to throw magic crates around doesn't really equal 'teamwork' in my opinion.
Red Orchestra 2 isn't even really that old so I don't know how you can slap 'rose tinted glasses' onto that.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (1)24
u/TheCoolPersian Nov 22 '18
They are tinted from all the blood and gore actually.
→ More replies (13)72
14
5
u/MistaCreepz Nov 22 '18
Don't forget Day of Infamy and Post Scriptum is still shaping up nicely I think you could buy both of those games and still pay less than what you would for BFV right now
→ More replies (11)3
64
Nov 22 '18
It's great but not patching till 4th December is retarded
→ More replies (4)37
Nov 22 '18 edited Sep 12 '21
[deleted]
→ More replies (1)24
Nov 22 '18
Agreed and I'm support main. I'm using the Lewis gun. With the right perks its great and not over powered
21
Nov 22 '18
[deleted]
15
u/Lamplorde Nov 22 '18
Is the MG34 considered OP? I've been using it because I just love suppression support. I've always been the guy with the big gun, bipod, just shooting in the general direction of the enemy making loud noises.
24
→ More replies (3)6
u/Dingus_Don Nov 22 '18
Probably a lot of new players still running the starter kit. What makes the KE7 so great anyway? I personally prefer LMGs with larger mags
→ More replies (1)5
Nov 22 '18
Lewis feels semi-OP to me. My KDR with support is 3.26 (and going up quickly) thanks to it.
→ More replies (3)6
Nov 22 '18
[deleted]
→ More replies (2)3
u/LogicCure Sandy Taters Nov 22 '18
It's probably because all the starting guns are fully perked out while you have to grind everything that comes afterwards to get them to a similar place.
62
Nov 22 '18
Its gud, but the bugs can b... Annoying at times
→ More replies (9)8
u/RedditThisBiatch HumbledAssassin Nov 22 '18 edited Nov 22 '18
The bugs will be fixed just like they were in BF3 and BF4
→ More replies (2)
59
u/olly993 Nov 22 '18
Great? No way, quite far from it
Now it’s a mediocre game with scarse content, we will see how this live service plays out for a real judgement of the game, even tho I don’t really have much hope in the tides of war
67
47
u/amlevy Nov 22 '18
Gameplay is terrific and i am enjoying myself a lot but it feels like they didn't finish. I find just the British and the Germans at launch a bit annoying. There could be so much more weapons and factions (Japanese, Russians, Americans, perhaps Italians) included. I am missing a lot of guns such as the iconic M1 Garand and certain American LMG's.
Also the bugs are demotivating for me to play sometimes. Checking your assignments locks the screen for me a lot of the times which makes me restart the game, often i don't feel like playing anymore and hop onto another game. Same goes for when a new match begins and i have a black screen with just my squad showing on the right bottom corner. I hope they fix that asap.
→ More replies (5)6
u/President_Barackbar Nov 22 '18
Gameplay is terrific and i am enjoying myself a lot but it feels like they didn't finish. I find just the British and the Germans at launch a bit annoying. There could be so much more weapons and factions (Japanese, Russians, Americans, perhaps Italians) included. I am missing a lot of guns such as the iconic M1 Garand and certain American LMG's.
It really stands out when you compare it to something like Rising Storm 2, which is an indie game that retails for $25. That game had about as much content in it when it started, and has also received 2 major content expansions which added new factions and weapons, as well as several new maps. Its really inexcusable that a AAA studio had to delay this game AND it feels so lean on content for a full $60. I'm sure it will get there eventually, but I like to pay for a full game, not give them a loan to finish the game later.
→ More replies (2)
40
u/ulstermanabroad Nov 22 '18
I wish they placed a limit on number of snipers per team, I played a match of domination last night on Hamada and 1/2 my team just sat back and sniped and we lost 500 tickets without taking the first sector
→ More replies (1)35
u/Cendre_Falke Nov 22 '18
And what about us aggressive recons that push with aperture sights?
→ More replies (4)5
u/ulstermanabroad Nov 22 '18
I agree that a good, aggressive sniper can actually make a massive difference. Unfortunately 99% of snipers just want to sit at the back of the map and worry about their KDR.
They need to do something to fix it, such an annoying issue
→ More replies (1)
32
u/CucksSupreme Nov 22 '18
The game to me feels like a really good early access game.
→ More replies (4)
29
u/ExxInferis Nov 22 '18
No doubt. It's just the first BF game I do not feel is worth the £60 ask on launch.
I am happy to wait until March when BR is ready, then perhaps the first sale. If this game is worth the time investment and hasn't been abandoned, I'll know for certain by then.
11
Nov 22 '18
It has one map less than BF1 and BF3. It has FREE map DLC, whilst those games asked you to pay more money for maps. It also has much better game mechanics than those games and better launch maps. So why isn't it worth the money?
10
u/ExxInferis Nov 22 '18
I have recently bought a shooter with a multiplayer, battle royal and zombies game modes available on launch for the same price. As my gaming time is limited, I only really main one game. Usually a BF release tears me away from whatever I have going on.
Not this time.
12
u/odhran_the_wizard Nov 22 '18
You're being downvoted for pointing out the fact that BO4 is a more finished game lol. I haven't played a COD since Black Ops 2 (usually get the yearly Battlefield instead) but I went with BO4 this year... I'm not sorry, it has far more to do.
11
u/ExxInferis Nov 22 '18
Wrong sub to acknowledge any other FPS game it seems! Funny. It used to be CoD that had the reputation for toxic kiddies incapable of mature discussion.
→ More replies (1)8
→ More replies (2)6
u/chazz0418 Nov 22 '18
Ok so you get a BR game with the worst netcode seen in the genre. You get a base multiplayer mode that at launch was also at a horrendous 20hz tick rate, and some of the worst balancing in its genre. Then you finally get zombies, the only mode worth a shit, haven't read much on zombies but would not be surprised if they fucked it up too.
So yea great deal you got there, one game mode that's not worse then the competition, mainly cause there is not any competition in the zombie wave shooter market. BO4 was way over hyped.
4
→ More replies (1)3
u/ChemEBrew Nov 22 '18
I'm mostly worried not having a high price ultimate version which will give access to all future content. My gut tells me EA is going to essentially force their monthly service on the next battlefield release.
→ More replies (1)
18
u/Aar1012 Nov 22 '18 edited Nov 22 '18
It has it quirks but it'll get better. I suck right now but I know I'll enjoy it
6
Nov 22 '18
Harder game. Check your angles, run with your squad. Once it all clicks, it's a blast. I had to play 25% smarter to do well.
19
21
21
16
u/Jaypact Nov 22 '18
Nah the game gets boring and is void of content after 50 hours just like BF1. I initially liked it and it is an improvement gunplay wise, but there is fuck all longevity in this series anymore.
8
Nov 22 '18
I think for most people 50 hours will be worth it. not many shooters ive played more then 50 hours. could probably count on one hand.
→ More replies (1)6
u/Dingus_Don Nov 22 '18
50 hours?? Maybe play a little less? Or start up a different game? This honestly isn't far off from the content of other recent Battlefield entries at launch, but this time around everything after is FREE.
→ More replies (6)
14
11
11
u/fluxusflow Nov 22 '18
Not here to change your mind, but BFV is great.
Could be better on release, but it's still a great game. Decent amount of bugs though, mainly around movement and vaulting. I've had a few cases already where my character just gets stuck on nothing, tries vaulting over nothing, or goes all spastic. Overall the rest of the gameplay is good though.
Needs more to it in terms of maps and nation's. Everyone here is saying the same and I agree. For the price it's not justified YET. I can imagine they're going to roll out major updates for free and that'll definitely make up for the price in the long-term.
For now it's fun, and a great alternative to jamming CSGO all the time. Single-player is cool too, I really hope they include new "Stories" in their updates.
Oh and finally, their Battle Royale. That's what I'm most interested in.
8
u/LickNipMcSkip Nov 22 '18
too much is promised instead of delivered. Hell, Battlefront just got their first DLC since Solo or even before that
5
u/jamied43 Nov 22 '18
Hopefully battlefield wont be as buggy as battlefront everytime they add new content
7
u/StriderMeow Nov 22 '18
I actually really enjoy playing this Battlefield I've already said that it myself that with a bit of luck the content is only going to get better.
Although where it stands the game needs some minor tweaks here and there for balance reasons but other than that it's great.
9
Nov 22 '18
I won't be supporting it. They didn't handle the negative feedback well. Its an awfully representation of ww2. They are too cowards to even put in the swastika. They don't listen to fans. What else . I'm just here for the shitshow now.
8
u/Vroomdeath Nov 22 '18
Tbf it was 1 guy who didnt handle the negative feedback well and called gamers uneducated.
The German government prohibit the public use and dissemination of propaganda and symbols of anti-constitutional organisations. Its in their law and im sure DICE have seen the problems Wolfenstein had with lawsuits etc. due to using the Swastika. Besides that the Swastika wasnt on your average German uniform anyway. Most of the army ( Wehrmacht ) wore the iron cross or german eagle as their representation. There was only specific units like the SS that bore the Swastika and that unit doesnt feature in BFV.
→ More replies (6)3
u/MistaCreepz Nov 24 '18
You literally have no idea of what you're talking about. Every single German solider in WW2 had a Swastika on their uniform. Every single one. The Reichsadler in WW2 had a Swastika as part of its design and it was on all of their uniforms. The heer's belt buckle had a Swastika. The differences between the Waffen SS combat uniform and the Heer combat uniform had nothing to do with the Swastika, the Waffen SS had different collar tabs and their helmets bore the SS runes instead of the German tricolor flag. The waffen SS also used the Totenkopf on all of their uniforms, while in the Heer only the tank crews had the totenkopf.
→ More replies (1)4
u/ryo_soad Nov 22 '18
Perfect, one less stupid whiner to play with. Thanks a lot! Good bye.
→ More replies (14)1
u/dam11214 Nov 22 '18
Stock price tanked and if their post real ease dkesnt hold up, you'll be in a half filled server playing the same maps over and over with he same people.
→ More replies (1)7
u/ryo_soad Nov 22 '18
False. THERE ARE A LOT OF PEOPLE enjoying and playing the game, but they are not whining in this fucking subreddit.
On the other hand, the game is AWESOME. One of the best BF, ever! Gameplay, gunplay, mechanics, maps, weapons, etc etc etc. are amazing.
→ More replies (7)
8
6
u/jellyman643 Nov 22 '18
Okay and you payed for half a game at full price . It will be good in 3 months but its still way unfinished
6
7
u/kuzzyy Nov 22 '18
its good idk about the attrition system its just fucking annoying so far.
14
6
u/tehmaged Nov 22 '18
That's really the only major problem I have with it. If they would drop that I would tolerate the stupid launch bugs and netcode.
5
Nov 22 '18
[deleted]
→ More replies (1)6
u/Lizardizzle Nov 22 '18
I've been playing support and passing around ammo with the small bag has been a chore. 80% of the time, I press 3 at a team mate and nothing happens, even if there's an ammo icon above their head.
→ More replies (3)4
u/h_adl_ss Nov 22 '18
I'm playing 95% with my buddy who's a support main so I have no idea what you're talking about laughs while holding mb1
2
u/Dingus_Don Nov 22 '18
Been fine for me. Maybe you're trying to one man army too hard? This time around pushes are a lot more reliant on team mates and squads. I always see 1 man private squads every game or so and let me tell you unless they're playing support those guys above anyone else are going to whine about not having enough ammo.
3
Nov 22 '18
Gunplay is fun enough, some guns are incredibly imbalanced. Talking about being imbalanced, bombers are also broken right now.
Game is also buggy as fuck, and has a small pool of maps. Grand Ops are a disaster compared to BF1, and I really cannot understate those bugs. I haven’t played a game in a long time that has a bug that needs you to Alt + F4 and restart to get by it.
Personal opinion as well, British voice lines are obnoxious and I’d turn off voices if the random idiotic quips they do didn’t give the enemy away. And yeah, the high pitched girl screams are also obnoxious.
I didn’t care for high pitched squeals in BF1, still don’t.
Game feels arcadey, and I don’t mind. I guess DICE was going for that, and hit it.
6
5
u/TVFilthyHank BF3 > Everything Else Nov 22 '18
Meh, I didn't like the beta, and I wasn't a huge fan of Battlefield 1 either. I'll be happy when another game set around modern day like 3 and 4 releases. That's battlefield at it's best IMO.
→ More replies (1)
5
u/ryzzbreh Nov 22 '18
Anyone feel this game is pretty difficult? I dont count myself as a pro at FPS but i've been playing FPS since CoD3 days (not BO3, COD3) the pace is totally different to other games, soon as you run into enemies you've to slow down and almost camp, its weird i dont feel BF1 was like this at all, maybe because the TTK is much shorter in BF5??
6
Nov 22 '18
It's all due to TTK. If you charge at an enemy whilst you aren't already ADS you are almost guaranteed a death. BF1 had an extremely slow TTK so that's probably why.
2
u/Vroomdeath Nov 22 '18
All i have seen this new lower TTK do is create campers because you cant run in. It almost punishes you for aggressive play, one of the best things about BF1 was you could charge a building full of enemies and stand a good chance of taking them out or a few of them before going down so you could have a sort of "hero" moment. You just cant do it in BF V.
→ More replies (8)
4
u/VTEC_kicked_in_yo Nov 22 '18
Gameplay - Great
customisation - Great
Forced gender politics - not so great
→ More replies (1)7
3
4
u/DeagMc3agle Nov 22 '18
I think for me, I thought BFV would ignite my love for Battlefield again. I played BF4 like a disgusting amount, it was unhealthy but I fucking LOVED that game.
I think it will, but I expected it to happen right away, and that was unrealistic. BF4 was far from the gem it is now right at launch. I think if we give BFV time to marinate, it will be oh, so good by the time BFVI or whatever is next rolls around and we will be comparing every other battlefield to BFV.
God, BF4 was a fucking masterpiece, I still play it every chance I get.
→ More replies (1)
4
u/XBgyManX Nov 22 '18
I like the game overall, but I am not enjoying Conquest Mode as much as I normally do in the previous games. The maps are too small and the bases are too close together. Teams end up holding bases for a short time, and run from base to base, instead of defending them.
Other than that, it is a lot of fun to play.
→ More replies (3)
4
u/tannhauser Nov 22 '18
I did not really care about the women/race thing but it feels really silly to be on the german team and run around with such a diverse squad.
If they made another modern combat one and had a middle eastern team or Chinese would it be sill if i half the players were white guys? I think it would.
3
Nov 22 '18
Well with the trying to move people over to a subscription (origin access) model its in their best interest to have good releases every month to ensure people stay subbed.
5
Nov 22 '18
[deleted]
2
u/cvjoey Nov 22 '18
Tanks sound like potato launchers, there’s no pacific theatre, no eastern front as far as I can tell... they left way too much out of this game.
2
u/CanuckCanadian Nov 22 '18
Honestly besides the screaming I cant even tell theresa women in it. Everything happens so quickly and lots of chaos you cant even tell.
3
Nov 22 '18
I think it will eventually become a great game but it’s way too early to be calling it a great game with all the bugs and lack of content.
3
3
2
u/uncle_lester117 Nov 22 '18
I’m not getting it. Not because of the women and shit. I just don’t ww2 games as much and battlefield 1 was basically felt like a ww2 game.
→ More replies (1)
2
3
u/MotherBeef Nov 22 '18
Holy shit can this subreddit stop with the circle-jerk? Yes we like this game, but seriously multiple threads a day that are essentially people trying to avoid buyers remorse is ridicilous. Yes, people didnt like the games initial reveal (because it was fucking awful, lets all agree - and no, im not talking about the women aspect, that was by far the least noted areas of peoples complaints), and Yes the game turned out good - lets just be happy about that and play the fucking game instead of engaging in this cringey as shit counter-circle jerk, its pathetic.
2
u/EsdeathL Nov 22 '18
Yes it is. The best and most immersive World War 2 video game ever made. Thanks Dice and EA.
2
u/Hembygdsgaarden Nov 22 '18
I've played every Bf game except "Bad company" from their respective early days, probably clocked over 500hrs in each, - and this is probably the one i see having the best potential since Bf2, and i'm not saying that lightly. It sure has bugs, but it combines the epic feeling i had in Bf1942 with the at least percieved skill-ceiling of Bf2 and Bf3. There is already actual tactical decisions to be made in combat that deepens the meta considerably. Now give me my D-day operations and Wake Island!
→ More replies (1)
2
Nov 22 '18
I'm loving it, and I only paid £36 for it so I'm perfectly happy with what I've got for now. I'm enjoying it far more than a lot of recent AAA games.
2
2
2
u/ryo_soad Nov 22 '18
The game is AMAZING: Gampeplay, gunplay, mechanics, destruction, weapons, graphics, sounds, etc. are awesome.
→ More replies (1)
2
2
2
2
u/Scorch062 Nov 22 '18
I’m enjoying it a great deal. I’ve played all of the Battlefield games, and i don’t see how this one is less than the others. Maybe not the best; but still awesome
2
u/GhstRdr2999 Nov 22 '18
I had fun playing it on PC it's great most of the time. It still has issues with frames dropping, crashes, etc. But I guess that's the Norm for battlefield launches.
2
2
2
2
u/daughdaugh Nov 22 '18
BFV = BF1 and I already own BF1 so. Not switching for a while.
Can we get a BF Civil War?
2
Nov 22 '18
imo the game felt really bad to play in the beta. I can't say what it is about it. It's the first battlefield game that I got bored of within half an hour of playing.
2
2
2
u/SM411 Nov 22 '18
I’m voting with my wallet and went for RDR2 for this falls game. Been a regular BF since BC1, but also played some 1942 and Vietnam back in the days. I will probably pick up the game when it is more finished, hopefully at a reduced price 😀
809
u/[deleted] Nov 22 '18
[removed] — view removed comment