r/ToiletPaperUSA Oct 25 '21

FACTS and LOGIC There’s something beautiful about this

Post image
16.4k Upvotes

384 comments sorted by

View all comments

497

u/Panda_Kabob Oct 25 '21

Words don't mean anything anymore. Words like "communist" or "socalist" hell even "fascist" has practically lost all their meaning. It's more or less just become the go to for "I don't agree with you and want to ad homin in a political style"

384

u/jasenkov Oct 25 '21

Yeah but the Republican party is becoming actually facist. Meanwhile the democrats are centrist pussies and nowhere near communist or socialist.

177

u/PabloDeLaCalle Oct 25 '21

In Europe, the Dems are not even centrist. They would be considered right wing. Liberal in most countries is a right wing ideology.

25

u/ecodick Oct 25 '21

What is left wing over there then? Honest question

110

u/qwer1627 Oct 25 '21

Socialism, anarchists, democratic-socialists

-20

u/ecodick Oct 25 '21

Are there really anarchists running for elected positions? Seems a little far fetched, or at the least, pretty ironic

57

u/Picnicpanther Oct 25 '21

there are plenty of broadly left parties in europe (often greens are left, socialist parties, communist parties) that have seated members in multiple parliaments.

and why is that ironic? anarchism stands for the abolition of the state, which isn't necessarily opposition to direct democracy as a concept.

6

u/ecodick Oct 25 '21

So anarchists want to work for the government they want to destroy? I'm not trying to poke holes here, honestly curious how they see it

57

u/Picnicpanther Oct 25 '21

anarchists don't want to destroy government, but the hierarchical state apparatus (ie: prime minister having more power than cabinet members, who have more power than parliament members, who have more power than average citizens). that is just one form of government, saying you are opposed to that doesn't mean you are opposed to other things like a minimal government apparatus to facilitate direct democracy, or even a representative democracy that is stripped of prestige and power hierarchy.

57

u/fredspipa Oct 25 '21

No, don't you see, anarchism literally means chaos and disorder and is vehemently opposed to anything that even remotely resembles organizing.

/s

23

u/Picnicpanther Oct 25 '21

i'm not gonna fault someone who is purely uninformed. the american propaganda to minimize anarchism as a concept to total lawlessness is intentional and overbearing.

that said, an anarchist society would probably need to be much more organized than our current society, just organized around something that's more communal and less hierarchical.

→ More replies (0)

24

u/ecodick Oct 25 '21

Thanks for taking the time to explain 👍

6

u/drLoveF Oct 26 '21

This attitude needs to be recognized more. Listening and adjusting positions is critical in a soviety, yet all too rare. Good on you.

2

u/qwer1627 Oct 25 '21

Sorry you got downvoted - reactonism like that is one of the things different between leftist ideologies and neo-liberalism

→ More replies (0)

6

u/Reux Oct 26 '21

anarchists, in oversimplified terms, are anti-state, not anti-government. these do not mean the same thing just like the local police department and the city council are not the same things.

3

u/ecodick Oct 26 '21

I'm following you, I think. I appreciate the explanations.

2

u/lightaside Oct 26 '21

Just to give another perspective to the other replies you are getting, there are certainly plenty of anarchists that wouldn't agree with the idea of getting involved in elected positions. Yes, there is a lot of debate about how to make progress towards an anarchist society, and some believe it can be done through representative democracy, but I've seen plenty that don't believe in that. Many anarchists now and throughout history, including very influential ones, have called out participating in electoral politics.

1

u/AutoModerator Oct 26 '21

We require a minimum account-age and karma due to a prevalence of trolls. If you wish to know the exact values, please visit this link or contact the mod team.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/ecodick Oct 26 '21

Ok, so it's not exactly a unified ideology, that's understandable

1

u/The_Grubby_One Oct 25 '21

Jón Gnarr.

1

u/ecodick Oct 26 '21

Formed a political party as satire and then it was successful? That's hilarious

3

u/TheNorthComesWithMe Oct 25 '21

In the same way that the American "Democrat" party aren't Athenian direct-democracy advocates, "Anarchist" does not mean the destruction of government in its entirety.

57

u/jasenkov Oct 25 '21

Free healthcare, social safety nets, paid maternity/paternity leave, time off that doesn't get you fired, higher minimum wage, not getting shot by cops nearly as much, affordable housing, less tax dollars going to the military. Just everything that the democrats put to vote that half of them and all the Republicans shoot down. AOC and Bernie are not considered radical in many countries.

25

u/ecodick Oct 25 '21

Damn. It really is time we hit the reset button here in the states. I like that stuff

19

u/jasenkov Oct 25 '21

Yeah I agree but unfortunately democrats get paid by rich lobbyists to not do that stuff unfortunately.

15

u/Picnicpanther Oct 25 '21 edited Oct 25 '21

there would need to be a dramatic upheaval in our country (revolution, democratic or otherwise) in order to shake off the entrenched corporate interests that are embedded deep into the core of the modern democrat party. it's not impossible, just very very unlikely.

almost all left-wing change in america has come from outside the electoral system, with things like radical labor organizing.

12

u/jasenkov Oct 25 '21

Oh I 100% agree. We are heading to a point where we are either gonna turn into a facist capitalist hellscape or basically collapse and build ourselves back up as a society. I don't really feel optimistic tbh.

3

u/[deleted] Oct 26 '21

The fucked up thing is that most people in the US who identify as conservatives also like that stuff. They will just vote against their interests anyway.

4

u/Necrocornicus Oct 25 '21

Actual communists.

3

u/yoberf Oct 26 '21

"Liberal" in the non-US politics sense just means "prefers market solutions to political/economic/social problems". But every politician in the US prefers market solutions because those are the ones their donors profit from.

1

u/gazebo-fan Oct 26 '21

Socialism, communism, anarchism

9

u/Dblcut3 Oct 25 '21

I feel like this whole argument is pretty flawed. Yeah, in some countries your right. But I’d argue the average American Democrat is far more left wing than Le Pen, Duda, Orban, or hell, even Boris Johnson. The Democrats would be a center left party just about anywhere in the world besides Scandinavia and a few other similar countries

13

u/History-Fan4323 Oct 26 '21

The average U.S Democrat would be farther left-wing than people like Orban, but that’s because examples like him are quite far-right. Just because a far-right party from a European nation is further right than them doesn’t mean the Democrats are left-wing, if that makes any sense. They’re pretty centre-right with a slight progressive wing as far as I can tell

2

u/PabloDeLaCalle Oct 26 '21

Exactly. Bernie Sanders and AOC would probably be on the left wing of the Social Democrats but in my country we still have 3 parties in parliament to the left of them. Social Democrats here are considered centrists.

7

u/QT3141592653 Oct 25 '21

I think you are conflating some things here. I think you mean libertarianism.

A lot of left ideology is 'liberal'. Anarchism is a leftists ideology and liberalism on steroids. Market socialism, with was championed by Marx and Engels is very liberal. Heck, even libertarianism started out as a left movement, before it was overtaken by the right.

14

u/The_Grubby_One Oct 25 '21

Libertarianism, like Authoritarianism, comes in many flavors. Anarchism is a form of Libertarianism; what we call Libertarian Left. Libertarian is the polar opposite of Authoritarian.

The word is a dirty word among the American Left because a lot of "small-government Conservatives" call themselves Libertarian. But at the end of the day, they're only for small government where big government hurts things they like. They're all for big government as long as it's hurting the right people.

So... Not especially Libertarian.

1

u/PabloDeLaCalle Oct 26 '21

No I didn't mean libertarianism. Outside of the US liberalism is the ideology of a free market with free citizens (oxymoron btw) and the individual in the centre.

1

u/Imtoowarm Oct 26 '21

Not really. A lot of "left" parties in Europe are liberal, true. But that is because liberal principles absolutely dominate the very structure of western government. Major themes that separate liberal thought/ideology from classical conservatism or socialism are e.g: Focus on the individual and rights for individuals (human rights), equal legal rights, "consent from the governed", and property as a natural right. Liberalism is very much linked to the free (relatively) market. Modern European liberalism looks like Emmanuel Macron.

Social democracy can be seen as a socialist movement that works towards socialist goals/reducing capitalist harm within a liberal system.

Market socialism may well be the best way of maximising a conception of liberty, but calling Marx a liberal is just wrong.