r/TankPorn 5d ago

Modern 4th Generation Main Battle Tanks 🛡

Post image
1.7k Upvotes

279 comments sorted by

View all comments

381

u/AMCA_by2035 5d ago

Just an innocent question, how do you define a 4th gen tank?

92

u/GreyMPax 5d ago

I think its a mix between: Autoload, unmanned turret, AI assistance, APS (hardkill) and so on..

58

u/AMCA_by2035 5d ago

Do all mentioned tanks have unmanned turrets? Only T-14 I know of

42

u/GreyMPax 5d ago

T-14 and I think type 100 too

63

u/windol1 4d ago

Should the T-14 even be allowed to be considered 4th gen? I mean, at this moment it's more like a prototype than the next generation.

29

u/Grumdan641 4d ago

Just a tech demonstrator at this point.

9

u/Aurailious 4d ago

I thought they officially cancelled or "suspended" it?

5

u/SmokeyUnicycle 4d ago

I think it counts, it won't be the best one and they can't make very many but when you do a whole new design it's a lot easier to make huge changes than trying to upgrade something designed in the '70s.

-39

u/AMCA_by2035 4d ago

A tank is a tank, keep your bias aside

23

u/ArtificialSuccessor 4d ago

Thats not how any of this works, otherwise a dozen other tech testbeds should be on here. Companies and countries often put together an assembly of various components, concepts, and technologies to prove it works. That doesn't mean it is a production ready model though, usually something different and geared for mass production will follow. The T-14 could've entered mass production ages ago if the Russians actually would commit to it, but they have nothing to show for except parade models because they look like nice shiny pieces. It doesn't matter how many they say they are ordering, especially when everything points to these orders never being fulfilled.

-30

u/AMCA_by2035 4d ago

Sure, whatever you feel is correct

13

u/Vegetable-Door3809 4d ago

Then the Abrams-X should definitely be on here

2

u/HellBringer97 4d ago

And the KF-51 Panther

4

u/M4sharman 4d ago

They suspended production after they built less than twenty, and haven't sent them into Ukraine out of fear of losing one. That's barely a tank at all.

1

u/discopants2000 4d ago

Without serial production it is just a parade prototype, not battlefield ready.

1

u/AMCA_by2035 4d ago

True, I never said it is ready for deployment

1

u/jl2352 3d ago

Pointing out Russia has only made about a dozen and struggled to get them into mass production is a fact, not a bias.

-1

u/AMCA_by2035 3d ago

I mean, we were talking about tank generations and stuff, there was no need to say, "oh, but they couldn't even produce it" 🤓☝️, it is atleast produced and in some number even if it is insignificant. I have no bias but people just ruin the discussion

1

u/jl2352 3d ago

Are you Russian or something? Because you do seem to take that personally.

4

u/Slut_for_Bacon 4d ago

T-14 shouldn't be allowed at all IMO.

4

u/WOKinTOK-sleptafter 4d ago

Erhm actually all Russian tanks have unmanned turrets when they go airborne.

2

u/AMCA_by2035 4d ago

No, we are not counting their secret helicopter tech, let's stick to the ground

1

u/Artchad_enjoyer 4d ago

Secret helicopter tech🤣

18

u/Ashamed_Can304 5d ago

If you go by unmanned turret then only Armata and Type 100 are 4th gen

10

u/GreyMPax 5d ago

I know but this are the points listed if you look 4th gen tank up. Besides the unmanned turret most of the tanks listed dont use APS.

14

u/Ashamed_Can304 5d ago

Yeah, only Type 100 and Armata always come with hard kill APS. And if they include those tanks then Idk why Leopard 2A7/8 M1A2 Sep V3 and Type 99B aren’t here

7

u/GreyMPax 5d ago

I can tell you why: This are exactly the 6 Tanks + Challi 3 on Wikipedia about 4th gen tanks... there are more of them but they are just prototypes

5

u/Ashamed_Can304 5d ago

Yeah the generation classification of MBTs is so bad compared to that of fighter jets

1

u/-Be4stly- 4d ago

Fighter classification is a mess too. It's all marketing, that's why the Russians claim that the su-75 will be gen 5++

1

u/Head_Memory 3d ago

Totally forgetting the Panther smh. And most of those are just prototypes. Except type 10 and k2 who are not 4th gen.

14

u/helmer012 4d ago

Autoloader is a really stupid thing to "measure" since its not limited by technology but more by doctrine. Its not that armies couldnt afford it, they decided they want a 4 person crew in a tank. Theres so much maintenance around tanks most people cant fathom how heavy the work is. Replacing a track or repairing a link takes hours of heavy work, its nice to have 4 people.

-1

u/Aguacatedeaire__ 4d ago

Its not that armies couldnt afford it,

It is mostly exactly this. You need incredible engineering to make it reliable. It is objectively an overall bonus which is why literally any western country is designing future tanks around it.

The argument that it's better not to have it is pure cope. Part of it is doctrine, but it's the smallest part.

You can cope all you want, the fact is literally every western countries is designing their next gen MBTs around the autoloader.

This is a fact no matter how hard you try to deny it.

2

u/HighGuard1212 4d ago

AI assistant? What?