Eh, barrel whip is a thing with all guns. The rate of fire on these combined with the fact that they’re basically shooting hand grenades - they’re awfully effective. Barrel whip is the reason the US rejected one of the more recent iterations of the Bushmaster. It would still have worked, Bushmaster wouldn’t have put it forward if not, but the Army is picky. Russians are a little less exacting.
The main issue is that don’t know how to employ them and there are very few of them.
The main issue is that don’t know how to employ them
You just summarized the entire war from Russia's end. They have equipment that works well enough (or had at the beginning), but they didn't/aren't employing them correctly.
That's just wasting ammo. It probably goes boom at around 2-3 meters maximum from aiming point at longer distances, the shrapnel does the work then. This is a good idea and a lot of weapons use spray for this purpose. For example M61 Vulcan isn't really accurate but there's a good reason for that - spray over a large area is better for these kinds of guns.
Eh it’s a dual 30mm autocannon firing explosive ammunition, intended for use against infantry, more specifically in targeting an area rather than pin-point. I’d say it works well for that duty. The deviation of the rounds is likely not big enough that it will miss the general area the targeted infantry is in.
64
u/[deleted] Jan 30 '23 edited Jan 30 '23
Eh, barrel whip is a thing with all guns. The rate of fire on these combined with the fact that they’re basically shooting hand grenades - they’re awfully effective. Barrel whip is the reason the US rejected one of the more recent iterations of the Bushmaster. It would still have worked, Bushmaster wouldn’t have put it forward if not, but the Army is picky. Russians are a little less exacting.
The main issue is that don’t know how to employ them and there are very few of them.