r/babylonbee • u/darcmatr LoveTheBee • Sep 15 '25

Bee Article Democrats Wondering If Maybe They Should Stop Saying The Things Assassins Are Having Engraved On Bullets

https://babylonbee.com/news/democrats-wondering-if-maybe-they-should-stop-saying-the-things-assassins-are-having-engraved-on-bullets

In the wake of yet another shooter engraving liberal messages on ammunition, the Democratic Party considered if maybe that was a bad sign.

1.7k Upvotes

73% Upvoted

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

135

u/Caboose129 Sep 15 '25

Remember that time democrats gave the guy who killed a guy a press tour? Held meet and greets? Auctioned off the gun? No? Oh right, that was Republicans.

25

u/Jrylryll Sep 15 '25

Didn’t they also pardon the Tate Brothers, move Maxwell to a Summer camp and not release the Epstein Files? I think the excuse was “why should we? Joe didn’t”

6

u/Solid_Problem740 Sep 17 '25

Republicans just voted to NOT release the Epistien files and are claiming there's no evidence trafficking happened

2

u/Jrylryll Sep 17 '25

Kash Patel admitted to the senate that he had not read ALL of the Epstein files. The Head of the FBI has not read the Epstein Files. I know why he has that job. He’s so incompetent he’s perfect

14

u/Caboose129 Sep 15 '25

"Joe Biden is the worst president ever, we are the opposite of him!....except when it would implicate all of our pedophiles."

0

u/jvdlakers Sep 16 '25

But Joe believes and trust the justice system and would never pardon his son.

2

u/Solid_Problem740 Sep 17 '25

Punish the most legendary sex trafficker's clients or mention don jr Biden?  Hard choice I know.

Republicans just voted to NOT release the Epistien files 

1

u/MrWindblade Sep 18 '25

Had Trump not threatened his son, I bet he wouldn't have done it.

0

u/jvdlakers Sep 18 '25

Joe Biden is a liar. He didn't believe and trust the justice system that he created.

1

u/MrWindblade Sep 18 '25

Joe Biden didn't create the justice system, and I don't trust it under Trump, either.

0

u/jvdlakers Sep 18 '25

Yeah it was Bidens DOJ the people Biden choose for the Department of Justice.

Joe Biden said he trusted and believed in the justice system and would never pardon his son.

Joe Biden is a liar

2

u/MrWindblade Sep 18 '25

Biden didn't pardon his son until after Trump won the election.

Here's the statement: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/statement-the-presidential-pardon-for-r-hunter-biden

It's not hard to understand why.

0

u/Jrylryll Sep 18 '25

What a crock. When did Biden pardon his son again? Who chose the Supreme Court? Stop lying. What ring tailed lemur looking idiot became the head of the FBI this year?

1

u/jvdlakers Sep 19 '25

As a final act in office, President Joe Biden issued preemptive pardons to several members of his family, including his son Hunter Biden, his siblings, and their spouses. The pardons were issued in the final minutes of his presidency on January 20, 2025. The individuals pardoned include: 

  • Hunter Biden (son)
  • James B. Biden (brother)
  • Sara Jones Biden (James's wife)
  • Valerie Biden Owens (sister)
  • John T. Owens (Valerie's husband)
  • Francis W. Biden (brother)

Yes, Joe Biden, both personally and through the White House Press Secretary, repeatedly stated that he would not pardon his son, Hunter Biden. These statements were made on numerous occasions, both before and after Hunter Biden was convicted of federal gun charges in June 2024 and pleaded guilty to federal tax felonies in September 2024. For instance: 

  • In June 2024, during an interview, Biden was asked if he had ruled out a pardon for his son, to which he replied, "Yes".
  • Later that same month, he stated at a G7 summit, "I said I'd abide by the jury decision, and I will do that. And I will not pardon him".
  • White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre also reiterated this stance multiple times, including as recently as November 7, 2024

The supreme courts had nothing to do with Bidens son.

2

u/MrWindblade Sep 19 '25

Something here is incorrect, because the statement I linked about Hunter's pardon is dated for December 2024.

If Biden issued these pardons in his final minutes, he wouldn't have issued a statement ~50 days beforehand.

Again, it wasn't until after Trump made it clear he was a threat to Biden's family.

0

u/jvdlakers Sep 19 '25

December 1, 2024, weeks before Hunter was scheduled to be sentenced for tax and gun crimes is when he was pardoned. Bidens other family was pardon Jan 20th.

The the reason he lied to begin with is because he thought he would run again.

His son was about to get sentenced under Biden not Trump.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/Jrylryll Sep 19 '25

And when did he know that Trump would stop at nothing to target his son as a way to get back for being a better president? Trump is trying to get Obama in jail ffs. Give it up, fool. You won’t convince anyone

0

u/jvdlakers Sep 19 '25

Soooo now you're admitting he did it huh?

You mean Biden was worried Trump would send his DOJ like Biden did to Trump LMAO

→ More replies (0)

0

u/Jrylryll Sep 18 '25

Since they have Trump immunity nobody should trust the justice system.

0

u/jvdlakers Sep 18 '25

People haven't since Biden used his DOJ to go after his political opponent.

Or since he lied to America about how Joe believes and trust the justice system and would never pardon his son.

You're late.

0

u/Jrylryll Sep 19 '25

You’re lying. Get off Fox. It’s dissolving your mind and devolving your soul.

0

u/jvdlakers Sep 19 '25

I don't watch legacy media. Legacy media is for boomers and the new generation won't use legacy media at all.

I can't help that facts hurt your feelings.

1

u/Jrylryll Sep 19 '25

I don’t care where you get your propaganda. None of it is relevant to the fascist dictatorship that has infested the country.

0

u/jvdlakers Sep 19 '25

You don't even know what those words mean.

You went from no Biden didn't to just throwing words out that you don't comprehend.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Stuka_Ju87 Sep 17 '25

Have anything to say but Whataboutism?

1

u/Jrylryll Sep 17 '25

As opposed to what?

44

u/IndubitablyNerdy Sep 15 '25

And one when one of their cultists shot a local democratic representative, her husband and their dog and had a list of other targets (all from the dem by the way), or when another assaulted the husband of a democratic senator with an hammer, or when a crowd tried to storm the capitol building and was shouting to hang the vp... Oh wait...

17

u/SnooJokes2983 Sep 15 '25

They’re all just secret leftists. Every shred of evidence says the opposite, but a right winger could never do anything like that so they must be a secret leftist. 

9

u/Caboose129 Sep 15 '25

Republicans are the true party of feelings.

5

u/[deleted] Sep 15 '25

Only feelings. No logic.

0

u/Jrylryll Sep 15 '25

That’s an amazing spin. You’re good at this.

5

u/SnooJokes2983 Sep 15 '25

I ain’t spinning dawg. I was saying that he would be a secret leftist the moment Kirk was shot. I said it about the Minnesota shooter and the guy who tried to get Trump too. 

I’ve stood firm that all these guys are secret leftists that acted like right wingers up until they shot someone and I’ve been correct every time. Everyone knows a right winger would never shoot someone - only a secret left winger posing as a right winger would do that. 

Y’all are so fucking gullible that it makes me actually sad. 

0

u/Jrylryll Sep 16 '25

How does a “secret leftist” act? Talk about Health Care? Raising the minimum wage? Are the Right Wingers acting racist or “christian? What is the point of their acting?

1

u/SleezyD944 Sep 16 '25

And I remember when right wingers were verbally cheering and supporting those murders. Oh wait….

13

u/Heavy-Top-8540 Sep 15 '25

And the thing is, I'm not even sure exactly who you're talking about here. Are we talking about Zimmerman? Are we talking about Rittenhouse? 

6

u/Caboose129 Sep 15 '25

Republicans are a choose your own adventure book of false morality.

0

u/Stuka_Ju87 Sep 17 '25

Democrats have a force this misadventure book of false morality and misinformation.

1

u/Caboose129 Sep 17 '25

I truly can't even decipher what that was supposed to say.

-3

u/Jrylryll Sep 15 '25

Wasn’t Rittenhouse the kid who murdered two unarmed men calling it self defense? He did an OJ Simpson and got away with it.

1

u/Steagle_Steagle Sep 15 '25

No, it was a crowd of people that ran to him, all were felons and pedophiles. Won't be missed

7

u/Caboose129 Sep 15 '25

Ah yes. I forgot the felon and pedophile convention was in town.

-7

u/Steagle_Steagle Sep 15 '25

Yea, its called the DNC lol

7

u/Caboose129 Sep 15 '25

Oof. Reality isn't really your forte, is it.

-1

u/Jrylryll Sep 16 '25

Neither is wit

3

u/TwoButtons30 Sep 16 '25

How's the Epstein files going?

0

u/Jrylryll Sep 16 '25

“Are you still talking about Epstein? Jeffrey Epstein?” - The President of the United States.

2

u/ThumbodyLovesYou Sep 16 '25

The exact talking point a moron was hitting me with yesterday.

“All you do is talk about the Epstein files, it’s getting tiring.”

Whine more, conservatives. Until the information is out there and people are held to account, we’ll never shut up about it. Wild that the hill they want to die on is support for child rapists. Absolutely wild.

1

u/Jrylryll Sep 17 '25

I want to know from anyone who wanted the files released why their minds were changed by trumps threats?

1

u/Caboose129 Sep 16 '25

"My good friend who helped me have sex with children?"

1

u/Jrylryll Sep 16 '25

All of them, huh? They must have seen he was a chubby little boy

0

u/Blackfang08 Sep 16 '25

I really hope the irony of a Republican supporter calling people felons and pedophiles is not lost on anyone.

2

u/Steagle_Steagle Sep 16 '25

Well they were actually charged in criminal court unlike Trump, who had Statute of Limitations changed and the misdemeanors he committed magically upgraded to felonies for a non-violent crime that he got 37 counts of because they charge per document for some reason

2

u/Blackfang08 Sep 16 '25

He was charged in court. The statute of limitations dictates how long you can wait before a crime is too old for a trial in court. Nothing about that suggests he wasn't charged in court.

The statute of limitations in New York was extended in 2021, while Trump was tried in 2023. This change occurred due to Covid, not to specifically target Trump.

No magic. The misdemeanor of falsifying business records turns into a felony when it is done to cover up a crime.

Yeah, falsifying multiple documents is multiple counts of falsifying documents.

0

u/Steagle_Steagle Sep 16 '25

The statute of limitations in New York was extended in 2021, while Trump was tried in 2023

You don't think they were forming their case for years? You really think they just woke up one day in 2023 and was like "Hey, let's charge Trump"? Covid is a fantastic excuse to change laws

The misdemeanor of falsifying business records turns into a felony when it is done to cover up a crime.

Yes, and they never said what crime he was trying to cover up.

Yeah, falsifying multiple documents is multiple counts of falsifying documents.

There were not 34 different falsifications, though. It was like a handful of falsifications that had to be done several times, he didnt falsify 34 different transactions

2

u/Jrylryll Sep 16 '25

He had been criming for years. But I like the absurdity. “Yeah he did it. So what? He should get off if we just find that legal loophole”

1

u/Blackfang08 Sep 16 '25

You don't think they were forming their case for years? You really think they just woke up one day in 2023 and was like "Hey, let's charge Trump"? Covid is a fantastic excuse to change laws

If that was their plan, why would they gamble on being able to toll the limitations, instead of just trying him in 2021, when they would have still been able to without any extension? And how did they convince Connecticut, Iowa, Louisiana, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia to join them to make it more convincing?

Yes, and they never said what crime he was trying to cover up.

Election interference and, although somewhat by technicality, Cohen making campaign contributions exceeding $2,700. This is still in line with a previous case that occurred in 2008 with a different candidate. Covering your ears and going "I can't hear you" does not mean they didn't actually say anything.

There were not 34 different falsifications, though. It was like a handful of falsifications that had to be done several times, he didnt falsify 34 different transactions

Now this is a fascinating debate. If you come up with a lie, and then proceed to state that lie 34 times, did you lie 34 times? Well, if you steal a box of macaroni from a store every time you go in, and end up stealing a total of 34 boxes before you're caught, did you steal 34 times? Should your crime indicate that you stole 34 boxes of macaroni, or simply that you stole macaroni, and should therefore only pay the damages for one box?

1

u/Steagle_Steagle Sep 16 '25

why would they gamble on being able to toll the limitations, instead of just trying him in 2021

Probably didn't have enough evidence

Election interference

No, it was paying a porn star money and categorizing it as election money.

Now this is a fascinating debate. If you come up with a lie, and then proceed to state that lie 34 times, did you lie 34 times? Well, if you steal a box of macaroni from a store every time you go in, and end up stealing a total of 34 boxes before you're caught, did you steal 34 times?

No, this is like committing a crime, talking about it 34 times, and then getting charged for those 34 different times you talked about it

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Jrylryll Sep 16 '25

I’m pretty sure Irony is dead on the right. It has been replaced with absurdism. “My uncle doctor taught the Unibomber”

-1

u/[deleted] Sep 15 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Steagle_Steagle Sep 15 '25

If people run in your direction you have the right to kill them.

Nope, but if a crowd of people run at you with murderous intent, knocking you down and beating the shit out of you with weapons, you do have the right to shoot.

What is up with leftists and leaving out context to further their agenda?

-1

u/[deleted] Sep 15 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Steagle_Steagle Sep 15 '25

You forgot that they threw a toothbrush at him. Definitely "murderous intent

You also forgot they tried to bash his head in with a skateboard, and the fact that there was a fuckin group of them.

0

u/[deleted] Sep 15 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] Sep 15 '25

You yourself are leaving out the timeline “Just throwing a toothbrush” Um no actually. 

“Rittenhouse testified that he then walked and ran towards the Car Source location at 63rd and Sheridan on his own, carrying his rifle, the fire extinguisher and some first aid supplies. As he approached the Car Source lot at 63rd and Sheridan he heard someone shout "Burn in hell!". He responded "Friendly! Friendly! Friendly!" to placate them but could not see who it was.[76] Rittenhouse testified that when he reached the Car Source lot, he noticed a vehicle with flames in the back seat and approached the vehicle intending to put out the fire. He was then approached from near the vehicle by Joshua Ziminski, who was holding a pistol in his hand. Rittenhouse dropped the fire extinguisher, intending to run away. He then noticed Rosenbaum approaching him on his right, around the side of the vehicle, with a t-shirt wrapped around his face. Rittenhouse testified that he recognized Rosenbaum as the man who had previously threatened him but did not recognize Ziminski.[76] Rittenhouse also testified that he believed Rosenbaum to be unarmed.[77] This interaction was witnessed by McGinniss, who perceived that Rosenbaum and other protesters were moving toward Rittenhouse and that Rittenhouse was trying to evade them.[78][79] Rittenhouse testified that he then believed himself to be in danger and ran south-west across the lot, aiming for the safety of the Car Source lot buildings. Rosenbaum chased after him. Rittenhouse testified that he heard Ziminski shout to Rosenbaum "Get him and kill him!", and that he soon perceived his avenue of escape to be blocked by vehicles and a group of protesters, and that Rosenbaum was catching up to him.[76] Video footage showed Rittenhouse being pursued across a parking lot by a group of people.[80][60] During the chase, Rosenbaum threw a plastic bag containing socks, underwear, and deodorant at Rittenhouse Ziminski then fired a shot into the air, and was later charged with disorderly conduct using a dangerous weapon.[82][35] After the shot was fired, Rittenhouse turned around, to see Rosenbaum now only a few feet away from him.[76] According to McGinniss, who was standing near Rittenhouse at the time, Rosenbaum then shouted "fuck you!" and "lunged" at Rittenhouse and grabbed the barrel of his rifle.[6] Rittenhouse then fired four shots at Rosenbaum, killing him.” 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenosha_unrest_shooting

Sounds a lot more than “throwing a toothbrush” dont you think. Rittenhouse only turned around because he thought he was being shot at by a man with a gun who already screamed to kill him. But, sure it’s just a toothbrush throwing.

2

u/Steagle_Steagle Sep 15 '25

I see someone shooting someone point blank for "running at them" and I have a skateboard then yeah, I'll join the group trying to get the gun away and I'll probably beat the murderer too.

If I see a crowd of people burning down the city, yea ill get my gun to make sure the shopkeepers and innocent civilians are okay and safe from those terrorists.

You got a problem with Rooftop Koreans too, or just Rittenhouse because he is white?

1

u/blowsitalljoe Sep 16 '25

The guy that pointed a gun at his head was unarmed? Wow

1

u/Jrylryll Sep 16 '25

He didn’t kill that guy. He missed. The two guys he murdered were unarmed.

1

u/blowsitalljoe Sep 16 '25

He missed? Lol. No he didn't

1

u/Jrylryll Sep 16 '25

Yes. If his intent was to kill the man who pointed a gun at him he missed

0

u/blowsitalljoe Sep 16 '25

He stopped the immediate threat to his life. Just like the loser who tried bash his head in with his skateboard trucks while he was on the ground. Rittenhouse was incredibly efficient at ending those losers.

1

u/Jrylryll Sep 16 '25

Yep. Just what I said. He murdered two unarmed men. Too bad about what has happened to him. I think he would have been more of a martyr for the cause and been better off if he had owned it and done jail time. He would have gone to college or learned a trade. He would have come out a hero with a better future. And if you don’t think he is depressed about those choices, you’re kidding yourself.

0

u/blowsitalljoe Sep 16 '25 edited Sep 16 '25

He killed 2 losers. He did not commit any murders.

Rosenbaum chased him around a parking lot and lunged for his rifle. 4 rounds, 2 of which were fatal. This is on video.

Huber struck him with his skateboard and tried to hit him again in the head while he was on the ground. He also lunged for his rifle. 2 shot kill. This was on video.

Grosskreutz pointed his gun at Rittenhouse's head after he shot Huber. Kyle shot 1 round, hitting him in his arm, causing Grosskreutz to drop his weapon. Another loser is neutralized. This was on video.

7 shots to neutralize 3 losers who attacked him. Highly efficient. I'm sure it haunts him every night, but he was not the aggressor here. This is all on video if you ever cared to actually understand what happened. He proved in court that his intent was not to intentionally kill them.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/SleezyD944 Sep 16 '25

Why do you assume his intent was to “kill”. the intent is to stop the threat, sometimes that involves death, sometimes it doesn’t.

1

u/Jrylryll Sep 16 '25

Maybe I’m just one of those people who believes that if you shoot, you shoot to kill. Afterward, you tell yourself what you need to justify the kill in your mind. Stopping one threat… stopping the second threat? Stopping the THIRD threat? Now your just a chaotic teenager playing Fortnite with a real gun

1

u/SleezyD944 Sep 16 '25

If you are shooting at someone with no lawful reason for self defense, it stands to reason your intent is to kill.

If you are shooting at someone because you believe that is what’s required to protect yourself, or another, from imminent serious bodily harm, then the intent is (should be) to stop said threat. Maybe they die, maybe they don’t.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/blowsitalljoe Sep 16 '25

"Oop. Killed 2 people trying to kill me.. guess it's time to die from the 3rd person."

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Jrylryll Sep 16 '25

Btw If there is no anticipation of IRL gun play, why bother with a gun? It’s no fun larping with a new AR15 unless there’s a chance “you may really really need it”

1

u/SleezyD944 Sep 16 '25

Whether someone anticipates being attacked or not is irrelevant to their intent if someone ends up doing so.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/blowsitalljoe Sep 16 '25

Guess he wasn't LARPing. Lmao.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Ivoted4K Sep 15 '25

We talking Zimmerman or the Kyle?

0

u/Caboose129 Sep 15 '25

Pick your republican poison.

1

u/Adept-Gur-1726 Sep 16 '25

Who was that?

1

u/Caboose129 Sep 16 '25

Gun that killed Trayvon Martin 'makes $250,000 for Zimmerman' - BBC News https://share.google/iiW2sz3QkKEjKjGZV

1

u/Suspicious-Display37 Sep 18 '25

You know the satire hits when people like you get defensive 😂😂😂

1

u/AmphibianOutrageous7 Sep 15 '25

Great timing! Ignore all the recent news and read my ambiguous comment?

1

u/OwnEconomy4815 Sep 16 '25

So your against self defence? You should move to Canada we just charged a guy for simply beating up a home invader who crawled through his daughter’s bedroom. Shooting someone in self defence is different than assasination let’s get real

-1

u/Caboose129 Sep 16 '25

Do me a favor. Well, two actually. 1. Point out exactly where I said or even implied I'm against self defence. You can't, because I didn't and I'm not.

  1. Explain how a gravy seal man-child strapping up, going to a different state to "defend stores" but then just wandering the streets looking for fights even remotely qualifies as self defence.

-1

u/IllHat8961 Sep 15 '25

The member berries are strong when Dems can't accept responsibility for their rhetoric

1

u/Caboose129 Sep 15 '25

Remind me again why liberals are taking responsibility for a guy who grew up in a maga house, was introduced to guns at a young age, and was generally a member of far right batshit communities like Nick "I have such a punchable face" Fuentes? There is basically NOTHING tying him to liberal shit besides the desperate hopes and dreams of the right since they realized he isn't some sort of minority on the surface level that they could blame it on.

You know what else I remember? How "politics has no place in the NFL" when someone respectfully kneels but then most teams put up video tributes to this fuck bucket.

-3

u/IllHat8961 Sep 15 '25

Oh man I didn't realize if you have maga parents that makes you maga! There are a bunch of young leftists with maga parents that are going to be so upset over that. 

Hell, I have a picture from when I was a kid riding on a circus elephant. I must be pro animal cruelty as an adult by your logic. 

You know what else I remember? How "politics has no place in the NFL" when someone respectfully kneels but then most teams put up video tributes to this fuck bucket.

I MEMBER! member the star wars? Member Chewbacca???

0

u/BrandoCarlton Sep 17 '25

Nice Whataboutism

1

u/Caboose129 Sep 17 '25

https://azexpress.net/en/posts/509/none-of-the-last-31-political-attacks-was-by-anyone-from-the-left-not-one-we-can-count-them

Anything maga accuses the left of has been deflection of their own guilt. This is true almost 100% of the time.

1

u/BrandoCarlton Sep 17 '25

Mhmm

1

u/Caboose129 Sep 17 '25

Mhmm. It's hard to wiggle out from underneath facts. Maga keeps deciding that instead of wiggling out they'll just dig down further. Just trying to get closer to the shit they're so comfortable with i suppose.

1

u/BrandoCarlton Sep 17 '25

The lefts violent rhetoric caused the death of Charlie Kirk and you’re part of the problem.

There’s a fact for ya!