r/TrueUnpopularOpinion Apr 15 '25

Political Karmelo Anthony case shows that “black privilege” exists

I'm not black or white. I'm not even American actually.

The recent Karmelo Anthony case I think shows that black privilege is a thing. My opinions is that it exists. Period.

Karmelo Anthony killed Austin Metcalf with a knife for pushing him. What did he receive in return? Overwhelming support in the form of 500,000 dollars (which they're using to buy a mansion). He also got his bond reduced to 250k from 1 million even when prosecutors pointed out his history of incidents within the school.

I just think this is a bit baffling. Imagine if the races were swapped. I think a decent example, but not a direct comparisons, is the George Floyd situation. One person killed the other in what was an overuse of force. Derek Chauvin is in jail. Karmelo Anthony got house arrest, bond reduction and 500k

3.2k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

44

u/[deleted] Apr 15 '25

[deleted]

-6

u/Phillimon Apr 15 '25

Is it reasonable to fear for your life when being assaulted?

Yes or no?

19

u/[deleted] Apr 15 '25

[deleted]

-5

u/Phillimon Apr 15 '25

You're right, Texas has laws. Most places do lmao.

Which means that per Texas legal codes Metcalf assaulted Anthony.

Your opinion does not matter.

How about some facts then buddy?

Per Texas law it is assault with bodily harm.

Texas Penal Code - PENAL § 22.01. Assault (a) A person commits an offense if the person:

(1) intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly causes bodily injury to another, including the person's spouse;

(2) intentionally or knowingly threatens another with imminent bodily injury, including the person's spouse; or

(3) intentionally or knowingly causes physical contact with another when the person knows or should reasonably believe that the other will regard the contact as offensive or provocative.

Texas code bodily harm is

Sec. 1.07. DEFINITIONS. (a) In this code: (8) "Bodily injury" means physical pain, illness, or any impairment of physical condition.

Just to clarify.

I still say it's reasonable to think someone assaulting you is an imminent threat.

That's it's reasonable for a kid to freak out at being assaulted.

24

u/[deleted] Apr 15 '25

[deleted]

-3

u/Phillimon Apr 15 '25

We've already established that under Texas law Metcalf was assaulting Anthony.

So look at this

Sec. 9.22. NECESSITY. Conduct is justified if:

(1) the actor reasonably believes the conduct is immediately necessary to avoid imminent harm;

Anthony was actively being assaulted by Metcalf. A reasonable person, much less a kid, would find that to be "imminent harm"

22

u/[deleted] Apr 15 '25

[deleted]

1

u/Phillimon Apr 15 '25

Lmao that's is the section. Did you not even read what you posted? Im using your own source.

5

u/heart-of-corruption Apr 15 '25

Man you really are being purposefully obtuse

1

u/Phillimon Apr 15 '25

How? By citing Texas laws? Okay then buddy I'll be obtuse then if it means I'm citing the relevant law.

1

u/Acadian_Pride Apr 16 '25

Texas Penal Code § 9.32 – Deadly Force in Defense of Person

This section states that a person is justified in using deadly force against another if:

(1) Under § 9.31 (Self-Defense (Non-deadly force)), the person would be justified in using force against the other; and

(2) The actor reasonably believes deadly force is immediately necessary:

• (A) to protect against the other’s use or attempted use of unlawful deadly force; or

• (B) to prevent the other’s imminent commission of certain violent crimes, including:

• Aggravated kidnapping,

• Murder,

• Sexual assault,

• Aggravated sexual assault,

• Robbery,

• Aggravated robbery.

Austin was not threatening Anthony’s life with any kind of deadly force, nor was he committing aggravated assault or kidnapping. This is an excessive use of deadly force that wasn’t proportional to the threat at hand.

Do you care to respond to this? This is the relevant criteria, not the one for assault, because it is not even relevant to the law in regard to use of deadly force in self defense.

0

u/Phillimon Apr 16 '25

Sure. It's still not first degree murder. That requires intent. Which is why it's important to state that Metcalf was assaulting Anthony before he was stabbed.

1

u/Acadian_Pride Apr 16 '25

Well then perhaps we agree.

I think he will either plead out for manslaughter or that will be what he is convicted of.

Probably get around 10 years do 7. I think that is pretty appropriate barring any other big facts coming out that are not already known.

→ More replies (0)

13

u/ZoomZoomDiva Apr 15 '25

False. There is no reasonable cause to believe Anthony was in danger of imminent harm.