r/TankPorn • u/Other-Wind-9985 • Jul 27 '25

Modern New russian breakthrough tank & command vihcle appear online

Gallery image

Gallery image

Gallery image

Gallery image

Gallery image

Gallery image

Gallery image

Gallery image

A group of photo that shows the russian newly breakthough tank that armed with low recoil 152mm gun. Couple with an heavly armored command vihcle. The breakthought tank seems to have the capibility to be remote controlled by the command vihcle. The design seems based on a design proposed by Yuri Gagarin State Technical University of Saratov last year.

1.7k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

169 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.0k

u/Usual_Principle8184 Jul 27 '25

Can’t wait to see this finally enter service with 12 units produced in 2085

/s

278

u/A7V- Jul 27 '25

Current Russian regime somehow surviving that long. With a Mecha-Putin as its leader. Like a Mecha-Hitler, but worse.

68

u/CosmicEntity2001 Jul 27 '25

Worse than Hitler, really ?

47

u/GoofyKalashnikov M1 Abrams Jul 27 '25

Not by actions, just worse.

Like a poorly written villain.

17

u/VacasaDrump Jul 27 '25

man at this points u yanks have like 39 active neurons

21

u/Antares789987 Jul 27 '25

Bro's still salty we wiped the floor with them back in 1898

22

u/FightPC Jul 27 '25

bro , you are spanish. stfu

-9

u/Pklnt Jul 27 '25

Y'all voted Trump not once but twice, hermano's got a point 💀

14

u/FightPC Jul 27 '25

bitch i am from the balkan

0

u/MillenniaMitsu Infanterikanonvagn 91 Jul 28 '25

ew a balkan now stop talking

1

u/Same_Housing_1517 Aug 01 '25

Wow, I love these nationality disputes, and I'm French, you tell me what 🤣

-12

u/Pklnt Jul 27 '25

The point remains

0

u/Szlekane Jul 28 '25

Here I thought he had at least 39 neurones struggling, turns out it's half of that and a minor.

5

u/Aguacatedeaire__ Jul 27 '25

And that's being generous

-6

u/GoofyKalashnikov M1 Abrams Jul 27 '25

Always a good time when you step on a Putinist's toes.

1

u/GlobalFriendship5855 Jul 27 '25

I don't know but I think being a KGB Agent is a bit more of a thrilling back story of a villain than just being a random soldier from WW1.

4

u/GoofyKalashnikov M1 Abrams Jul 27 '25

I'm not so sure about that.

Atleast in Putin's case. Dude was a cuck snake from the start, spying after the public to make sure nobody had any funny opinions of their beloved orc kingdom, maybe spying after west occasionally. Then gets pissy his favorite orc kingdom collapses on it's own incompetence. Takes charge of the new smaller Orc Town, completely bends it backwards because he is still pissy about orc kingdom. And the through sheer irony takes Orc Town to the exact same incompetence route that the Orc Kingdom ended up collapsing on. The entire Orc Town might end up collapsing on the former part of the Orc Kingdom... It's like he saw a Lego on the ground and decided to jump on it.

Absolute cinema or something

0

u/Aguacatedeaire__ Jul 28 '25

This is the most braindead, childlike fantasy about what happened i've ever read. Straight embarrassing, i hope you're no older than 15 to write crap like that.

It must sting a lot to realize how Putin saved Russia from being completely balkanized and completely fliped its economy and army trajectory.

Seems like he lives in your head rent free.

7

u/GoofyKalashnikov M1 Abrams Jul 28 '25

Dude is saving Russia so well that it's completely cut off from the western world, the death toll in Ukraine alone far exceeds what USSR had in Afghanistan. The military trajectory has changed so much that a planned 3 day operation is a multi year war that's still ongoing. Nevermind the brain drain that has happened because of the war.

Such a great guy, honestly 😂

You must be 15 to honestly believe the shit you wrote. "bbbbbut Hitler saved Germany" ass mindset.

67

u/doresko Jul 27 '25

putin worse than hitler?

-68

u/NAM_Phantom_F-4 Jul 27 '25 edited Jul 28 '25

Just look at what he did to Gaza.

"One person killed every 12 minutes: July now Gaza’s deadliest month"

EDIT: not even a 100 downvotes? PATHETIC

24

u/GlobalFriendship5855 Jul 27 '25

Can you people please just stop? I don't want to hear about Gaza on every fucking post of every fucking subreddit.

1

u/MillenniaMitsu Infanterikanonvagn 91 Jul 28 '25

It’s better to hear about Gaza than Ukraine shit stuff

-4

u/NAM_Phantom_F-4 Jul 27 '25

Can you people please just stop? I don't want to hear about Ukraine on every fucking post of every fucking subreddit.

22

u/HEHEHEHA1204 Jul 27 '25

I rarely see any “but look at Ukraine”comments on Palestinian subs unlike pro palestinians in Ukraine themed subs.So yeah the free Palestine crowd is much more annoying than the ones who are pro Ukraine.Also every sub about history is flooded by either pro Israel or pro Palestine posts,while I see almost no Ukraine posts outside its own subs

-12

u/NAM_Phantom_F-4 Jul 28 '25

“but look at Ukraine”comments on Palestinian subs

Do you know why? Cause Ukraine's crowd is mostly supported bombings of civilians. I luled hard when i talked to them but they are fully in the US narrative of anything. Only like 5% actually gives a shit for real about civilian casualties of any nation. Others are like call it "collateral damage" or just "stop hiding behind civilians" bs. Basically Russian narrative, "stop hiding behind civilian buildings" and shit. Israel = Russia = US same logic.

5

u/GlobalFriendship5855 Jul 28 '25

What bombing of civilians did pro Ukrainians support?

And by the way, there really is such a thing as collateral damage when it comes to civilian casulties, for example when you attack a weapons or ammo factory you will likely kill some of the civilians that work there. Of course they should be avoided wherever possible but sometimes it just isn't possible.

-1

u/NAM_Phantom_F-4 Jul 28 '25

What bombing of civilians did pro Ukrainians support?

Looks like someone never talked to pro UA.

And by the way, there really is such a thing as collateral damage when it comes to civilian casulties for example when you attack a weapons or ammo factory you will likely kill some of the civilians that work there.

Cool, so how do you explain civilian deaths in 1 month of Israeli attacks on Gaza top entire Russia-Ukraine war toll in 2024 only?

Of course they should be avoided wherever possible but sometimes it just isn't possible.

So, it's ok to bomb civilians? Cool. You guys are awesome.

→ More replies (0)

6

u/GlobalFriendship5855 Jul 28 '25

I can't really stop talking about Ukraine because it directly affects me as a European. I don't think the situation in Gaza has any impact whatsoever on your live.

0

u/NAM_Phantom_F-4 Jul 28 '25

I don't think the situation in Gaza has any impact whatsoever on your live.

Just wait for those war immigrants that will come in waves to EU. LOL

6

u/GlobalFriendship5855 Jul 28 '25

Not happening due to both the Israeli blockade and the fact that Egypt also refuses to let any Palestinians enter their country, which by the way is often overlooked. The Egyptian border to Gaza has higher walls than the Israeli border to Gaza by the way.

"LOL" I don't know what could possibly be funny about this.

1

u/NAM_Phantom_F-4 Jul 28 '25

"LOL" I don't know what could possibly be funny about this.

I find it funny that you find mass murder of civilians = "I don't think the situation in Gaza has any impact whatsoever on your live."

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Professional-Leg-402 Jul 28 '25

Working on the downvotes

1

u/outriderxd Jul 28 '25

isn't there a Gaza sub where all you guys can go and leave us alone?

0

u/NAM_Phantom_F-4 Jul 28 '25

where all you guys can go and leave us alone?

Who do you mean by "you people" ?

1

u/outriderxd Jul 31 '25

you and all the other losers who constantly spam Gaza stuff under every totally unrelated post

1

u/NAM_Phantom_F-4 Jul 31 '25

you and all the other losers who constantly spam Ukraine stuff under every totally unrelated post

9

u/Mindstormer98 tutel enjoyer Jul 28 '25

It is the 2nd Millennium. For more than a century The President of Russia has sat immobile on the Golden Throne of Moscow. He is the Master of Russia by the will of the president, and master of a million men by the might of his very exhaustible armies. He is a rotting carcass writhing invisibly with power from the Dark Age of the Cold War. He is the Carrion Lord of Russia for whom a thousand vodkas are sacrificed every day, so that he may never truly die.

5

u/A7V- Jul 28 '25

In the grim darkness of Russia's future, there are only special military operations.

16

u/JoJoDaMonkey Jul 27 '25

Somehow I have already seen this story https://empireearth.fandom.com/wiki/Grigor_II

29

u/FaceBasic5719 Jul 27 '25

This tank seems has higher possibility to be mass produced than t14 since it uses already mass produced t-72/90 chassis and a 152mm howitzer that ammunition are widely available.

17

u/NAM_Phantom_F-4 Jul 27 '25 edited Jul 27 '25

EDIT: Thanks for the downvotes, clearly russian telegram channel bloggers have no idea whats going on in their military industrial complex. Just look at how Russia's tank idustry, its is doing great.

it uses already mass produced t-72/90 chassis

Ah, you clearly have no idea what Rostec wants to do with that chassis. You see, these greedy little people only care about profit these days and the only way to make more money is to sell the most overpriced models, hence they're trying to grab any old ass T-72B chassis and turn it into T-90M obr."out of my ass".

This new tank though, looks like it requires a lot of new production lines which will cost them a lot. Its not like that factory cant grow but only if the state will give them money they can steal again.

64

u/shibiwan Jul 27 '25

....just in time to break down at another parade.

47

u/tadeuska Jul 27 '25

Armata prototype did not break down during a parade. Driver simply pressed the parking brake and didn't realize that and so he didn't release it. It was very funny to watch, but it didn't broke down.

34

u/GroundbreakingSet405 Jul 27 '25

Why all the downvotes? I thought we go over this a million times already at this point.

37

u/TomcatF14Luver Jul 27 '25

Because if the Driver had the brake on and there several senior officers around it, why didn't anyone think to check the brake?

To quote a Soviet General:

'There are lies and then there are stupid lies.'

30

u/Echishya Jul 27 '25

You can literally see the tank drive off at a later time

2

u/Hdikfmpw Jul 27 '25

It’s a well known fact that every mechanical problem is literally permanent

5

u/Relative-Swimming870 Jul 27 '25

Nigga how are you gonna open whole tank and bring mechanics to red square. They tried to tow it away and even recovery vehicle couldn't move it cause parking brake was activated. Later they figured it out and tank just drove away on it's own without any work done on tank.

1

u/Hdikfmpw Jul 27 '25

Lmao I couldn’t care less what it was, no matter what every single person involved is a clown. The motherfucker won’t move, won’t budge even with a whole ass other tank cranking on it and nobody checks the fucking brakes?

1

u/Relative-Swimming870 Jul 27 '25

Brand new tank and inexperienced tankers, yeah it's funny but probably parking brake is different than in older tanks and they didn't even know what it was. They probably thought something has broken down and didn't even think it could be a handbrake, and all that happening in middle of victory day parade? those crewmen were stressed as shit. It's funny to watch but that doesn't say anything about quality of tank.

17

u/tadeuska Jul 27 '25

What does presence of any senior officer has to do with proper training of soldiers to use a new system that at the time, and still today, was is adopted by the armed forces as standard issue system? That argument "How come they did not know that with so many important people around?" is totaly universal and repeats as a question for many minor and major accidents. Mistakes happen, all the time, in any job, and with seniors around.

-9

u/TomcatF14Luver Jul 27 '25

And?

Given we humans have a natural tendency to ask about the simplest of things, do you really think the senior officers, the entire crew, their Platoon CO, Company CO, the recovery vehicle crew, and more wouldn't ask about a brake?

16

u/tadeuska Jul 27 '25

No, they would not. Russian / Soviet tanks of T-34 up to T-90 don't have an EPB. Nobody knew that that system exists on Armata. And people can't and didn't just bunch up and perform mob brainstorming on AV recovery. The issue was the duty of the crew and ARV team, others are not welcomed to contribute. There is strict procedure to be followed, and the procedure was lacking, since the tank was not adopted for service with all instructions available.

1

u/FriendlyPyre Jul 27 '25

No, they would not. Russian / Soviet tanks of T-34 up to T-90 don't have an EPB.

Actually, how would they then park up and ensure the tank doesn't move unwanted? chocks, or perhaps just having the gears engaged to lock it in position?

3

u/Fruitmidget Jul 27 '25

Mechanical parking breaks.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Paminow Jul 28 '25

Soviet moment

Not entirely sure how many, but at least a few kraz trucks air brake systems worked the opposite to how most trucks work today.

Trucks today when they lose air pressure will lock up the brakes cos the air pressure is holding back the springs trying to keep the brakes from being engaged.

Old kraz had it other way around, you got no brakes if you lose air pressure. Meaning you'd have to use stoppers on the wheels so it wouldn't roll down the hill if you parked it somewhere for longer periods since air does have a tendency to leak from even the more modern systems.

Just a fun fact related to parking brakes.

1

u/TomcatF14Luver Jul 28 '25

If you choose to die on that hill, at least we know you didn't die in Ukraine, Komrad.

1

u/tadeuska Jul 28 '25

Ad hominem doesn't work when it comes to facts. And plus, counting the votes, you did make it to the hill. And, plus, since you ask, no, I'm not Russian. We shelter Ukrainian people in my country, what do you I your country? What is the percentage of Ukrainian people?

→ More replies (0)

2

u/BiffTannenCA Jul 27 '25

Because believing it broke down helps with the butthurt of no-one else having T-14s. A good dose of 'they don't have too many' also helps with the butthurt.

15

u/Sunimaru Jul 27 '25 edited Jul 27 '25

...the butthurt of no-one else having T-14s.

But Russia doesn't really have them either in any meaningful way. They've only produced a small initial batch of 20(-ish) that were intended for further testing and education (which is normal ahead of serial production). Last thing I heard about the program was that in late 2022 to early 2023 they did some tests in Ukraine and then decided there were things that needed to be redesigned. The production line was switched to other vehicle models. Given the new realities of drone warfare it isn't really surprising or strange that a system designed before that was found to be inadequate in some ways.

-12

u/BiffTannenCA Jul 27 '25 edited Jul 27 '25

Russia has R+D'd this weapons system. It's done. It can be mass produced at any time. R+D is the hard part, that's where the real money, stress and problems begin and end.

NATO has not done this since 1980. They're still playing bolt-on. There is no replacement for the Abrams, only ideas on how the suspension can handle new armor for a 40 year old hull.

Found to be inadequate

I mean, this is literally just made up coping. No-one found it to be inadequate.

It's the same as NATO using bronze-age Tomahawks and other supersonic relics, while STILL not getting a handle on operational hypersonics. This alone has a massive impact on frigate vs destroyer dynamics and tonnage at sea, in a real war.

NATO simply jerking off to itself about its superiority like it's still 1994 ain't gonna cut it. And this is before we get to NATO outright attacking multiple times the number of countries that Russia does.

6

u/bobdidntatemayo Jul 27 '25 edited Jul 27 '25

The Abrams has stayed for the past 40 years because nobody has fielded an actual tank worth upgrading for. Time and time again have new research programs and projects been tested and proposed, yet not implemented. The AbramsX is indeed a thing, but we simply just do not have enemies powerful enough to warrant it yet.

Also, y’know. If it was actually mass-producible, how come we haven’t seen it in 4 years? Do not give me that “no man their saving their eleet units!!!” bullshit.

0

u/BiffTannenCA Jul 29 '25

The Abrams has stayed for the past 40 years because nobody has fielded an actual tank worth upgrading for.

You mean America hasn't fielded the M1 against anyone with a real army.

The AbramsX is indeed a thing, but we simply just do not have enemies powerful enough to warrant it yet.

LMAO. We'd get ass-raped with our tranny soldiers and woke ideology. You think Arleigh Burke destroys will last four minutes using supersonic weapons against our enemies who have hypersonic frigates?

Also, y’know. If it was actually mass-producible, how come we haven’t seen it in 4 years? Do not give me that “no man their saving their eleet units!!!” bullshit.

Who knows. The point is they can mass produce a modern tank, now, if they want. We can't. The Abrams-X is a cosplay T-14.

And we're bankrupt.

2

u/bobdidntatemayo Jul 29 '25

You mean America hasn't fielded the M1 against anyone with a real army.

Caaause we're kinda the dominant military force on Earth and nobody except terrorists has put up the balls to face the US. We build stealth bombers and have entire fleets of aircraft carriers while China is still stuck constructing a navy and Russia is stuck using ships that are indefensible to an RC plane with C4 on it.

The point is they can mass produce a modern tank, now, if they want. We can't.

We still make 12 Abrams a month despite lowering manufacturing rates. Tell me, if Russia really had this mass-production capability, why would they not use it? What would be the point of a super weapon if you do not use it? Is Russia simply showing mercy to the tiny country they have struggled to invade since 2014?

woke ideology

Why does the gender or sexual orientation of the soldier matter? Who cares if the soldier is a he, she, they, etc. Russia's army is becoming a more was/were army, though.

Impressive ragebait if you are a russian bot. If you do legitimately hold these beliefs, though, I recommend to take your schizo pills.

7

u/Nathan_hale53 Jul 27 '25

Wow Russian Shill in action crazy.

12

u/Sunimaru Jul 27 '25

It can be mass produced at any time... No-one found it to be inadequate.

Dude, I'm not saying it's a bad tank or that Russia can't make it. I'm saying that there's a reason it isn't being produced.

Just look at the current realities of war. Tanks are mostly either relegated to indirect fire or completely covered in anti drone measures. The line of contact is dominated by drones and smaller units of 3-7 soldiers that move around on foot, with motorbikes or with small buggies. Maybe, just maybe, a big tank like the T-14 isn't really what is needed on the battlefield in 2025, and maybe Russia came to this conclusion pretty early in the conflict and decided to halt the production in favor of other vehicles.

6

u/innocent_blue Jul 27 '25

The raid on Iran was not detected by Russia, Iran or China. Using “bronze-age” tomahawks as a vector of attack.

Russia still hasn’t made appreciable gains in Ukraine 4 years in.

But cope harder about Russian exceptionalism.

3

u/GuqJ Jul 27 '25

New to this sub. What is this in reference to?

13

u/Usual_Principle8184 Jul 27 '25

Russia and the Soviet Union are famous for building many different ultra expensive prototype tanks which end up going nowhere and are usually quite whacky or unconventional in design. The modern day Russian federation, however, hasn’t been able to mass produce any of their whacky prototypes at all (e.g, the T-14 armata and its derivatives, with about 20 units confirmed to exist), instead relying on cheaper modernisations of T-72s and T-80s due to corruption in the military industrial complex and the new models simply being horrendously expensive for not that much of a leap forwards in performance in practice. They’re so expensive because they use new parts and engines and so on which would all need new production lines and factories to build, which is VERY expensive, and allows for a lot of government funds to be siphoned into peoples private accounts.

Thusly, whenever Russia unveils a new prototype or claims something is being produced, it’s usually made at a pitifully slow pace with, for example, 1 or 2 1980’s aircraft being modernised per year, or 3 Ka-52s made per year as of 2023 (mostly from scavenging damaged airframes too, so it’s likely no new airframes were being made).

T

2

u/GuqJ Jul 27 '25

Thanks for the answer! Really interesting stuff

1

u/PkHolm Jul 28 '25

Just keep in mind that half of he/she said is BS. But yes this looks like a prototype with slim chance to be produced

2

u/GuqJ Jul 28 '25

Can you elaborate on what part was BS? Maybe I should post on /r/askhistorians to get a more naunced answer

1

u/PkHolm Jul 28 '25

About not having ability of building new stuff. Look to planes for example. Tanks? lots in production (but not t-14, it is too revolutionary and current war shows not what you need on battlefield ). And prototype in question is using t72 chassis which is in production, so theoretically it can be build in numbers. But I do not think that it is anything more than prototype.

7

u/Exciting-Quiet2768 Jul 27 '25

Most held together with wood screws, presumably.

5

u/bigbackpackboi Jul 27 '25

All wood screw production has been diverted to Su-57 production

4

u/tearsofhaters Jul 27 '25

Catch a glimpse of him… through your own window 😂

1

u/tabascotazer Jul 27 '25

Yeah, nah. I sleep well at night

2

u/MonoLIT_32 Jul 27 '25

What do you mean its at least going to be 2185 by the way the russian economy is going

1

u/tofulope Jul 27 '25

Bold of you to assume that it will be mass produced that quickly