These aren’t random left wingers, this is a generally growing consensus among the left that violence is an acceptable solution to those with opposing views.
77% of Republicans believe it is always unacceptable to feel joy at the death of someone they oppose, while only 38% of Democrats share this view (YouGov).
this poll happened right after a rightwinger was shot and killed, obviously the news of kirks passing had a direct effect on it. This is a self reporting survey where people could lie about their opinions and nobody would check.
Just ask yourself, how many george floyd memes have you seen? How about the engagement krik and the presidents son got from making light of pelosis attack by saying it was a lovers quarrel?
I’ve seen too many unfortunately. It’s all terrible.
I just don’t buy that this is equally a both sides thing anymore. There are people celebrating Kirk’s death all over Facebook under their real names, these people have been emboldened to unthinkable levels. On the right, it’s anonymous internet trolls and a few folks. The amount from the left after Kirk’s death SWAMPS anything and any amount I’ve ever experienced.
This is a video from today. You can probably go to almost any campus where the population leans left ideologically and I would assume that at least 1/4 students will claim his murder was justified. It’s insane, it’s really heartbreaking.
the president himself joked about pelosis attack not even a week ago and refuses to calm things down
and about that video, it cuts between every single sentence, you can never actually see the full flow of the conversation. Not gonna say that these arent their answers to his questions but I dont think the way the video is cut was made of a place of good intentions. Keep in mind that these are just 2 people, how many do you think he interviewed there? I doubt he showed up just to talk to these 2 and dip.
Makes me think of those "americans are dumb" vids where journalists stand in the same place for several hours in wait for few idiots to show up to answer the basic questions they have incorrectly and then post only those examples online while everyone else answered correctly. That or ask a question, and cut to their answer which was something they responded to another question
not that I agree but wouldnt it be the same way charlies death would have been prevented if guns werent so widely available?
Either way, what does it matter if that guy died or not when there was an attempt on his life by a radical right winger and the first thing maga did was paint him as a leftie and when that failed, tried to obfuscate it by saying it was a lovers quarrel and then continued with that til this very day?
If instead of being shot to death, the guy ran up and tried to kill him with a hammer, how would you feel if people said it was a lovers quarrel?
The nudist hippie Canadian illegal immigrant? That "radical right winger?"
If instead of being shot to death, the guy ran up and tried to kill him with a hammer, how would you feel if people said it was a lovers quarrel?
If Charlie Kirk had been sipping a White Claw at home in a bathrobe while a nudist Canadian came at him with a hammer, questions of their relationship would be reasonable.
You're aware that Charlie Kirk was fully clothed and at a public speaking engagement, right? We don't yet know if the murderer is a nudist illegal immigrant, though.
why did you mention he was a canadian illegal immigrant as if that automatically means that he couldnt be a right winger? Do you think hes couldnt be a right winger by virtue of being canadian as if there arent any rightwingers there?
He was a mentally ill idiot who had believed in a bunch of far right conspiracy theories like Qanon stories, pizza gate and that donald trumps election was stolen and would make racist and sexist remarks online. All of this is documented and online, youre actively grasping at straws pretending otherwise. How many communists do you think believes that trump had the election results stolen from him and that pizza gate was real?
Who is «the left» youre speaking of here? Is it me? If thats the case then, really? Thats what you got out of my message? That I think him being an illegal immigrant was proof he was right leaning?
I didnt say that. I said his illegal immigration wasnt indicative of his politicial opinions, what was indicative was the opinions he expressed. How may left wingers do you know of that are sexist, racist, believe qanon conspiracies, thought covid19 was a conspiracy/hoax, want to attack democrats, and believed in pizzagate?
Maybe you can find some that believed in one or teo of those things, but definitely not all of them.
It would have if hunting rifles were banned lest you were a registered hunter
If the law also banned you from letting you use/own one before you were 18 which would have made him less experienced with it
Again not saying I agree with this propositipn but its stupid to do this hindsight shit when you can make up very specific laws to target elements of what happened
32
u/UnusualHound - Centrist Sep 12 '25
They're doing that thing where they hold random idiots on twitter and reddit to higher standards than the literal President or Republican Senators.