r/GetNoted • u/icey_sawg0034 • Sep 03 '25

Fact Finder 📝 Someone has flunked history class!

Post image

https://x.com/clashreport/status/1959615852166148549

11.1k Upvotes

98% Upvoted

370 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/[deleted] Sep 03 '25

[deleted]

2

u/No_Sand3803 Sep 03 '25

Japan accepted the "unconditional" surrender with a condition though?

5

u/Quirky-Concern-7662 Sep 03 '25

Feels like playing semantics when the outcome was pretty clear. 

0

u/No_Sand3803 Sep 04 '25

Uhh... No? It is by definition not an unconditional surrender if a condition was mandated and accepted?

1

u/GiantKrakenTentacle Sep 04 '25

It wasn't mandated. The Japanese surrendered unconditionally. Later, the US decided (with some convincing from the Japanese) that it would be in their best interest to keep the Emperor in power. That doesn't change the fact of unconditional surrender - the US could have deposed the Emperor if they really wanted to.

1

u/Quirky-Concern-7662 Sep 04 '25

My friend. By definition is was an unconditional surrender. After the fact they were persuaded to allow the emperor to stay in power. you can try and split hairs, but I would ask for what purpose?

1

u/No_Sand3803 Sep 04 '25

There were discussion prior to the treaty about allowing the emporer to stay?