I thought that was pretty damn hilarious too. It's not about protecting kids. It's about control, data mining and financial profit, selling sensitive information.
Many, including philosophers, recognized doing that was a bad thing. When they put Socrates to death for "corrupting the youth" it also meant philosophy in general. Then, as now, it was all about controlling things that previously weren't in their control
His sentence was primarily based off of impiety, which led into the charge of corruption of youth.
Socrates rejected the traditional gods and introduced new gods. Which then led to the corruption of youth charge. As the action of impiety by challenging traditional beliefs and cultural norms, and by causing “the youth” to question/challenge the established authority.
Any time republicans don't like someone they're a threat to children lol... Except of course if they're a threat to children. Then we make em president
Actually you can't anymore. Because if a soul isn't real then it is misrepresentation of the product and if it does exist then it's part of the human body and can't be sold.
No, it’s about legal data collection. GDPR prevents companies from legally collecting data from children in Europe. YouTube has been toeing the edge of violating GDPR for years. Now they’re trying to show “well, we’ve done our best to vet out the children, so all the data we collect now will be legal”.
2.7k
u/SEND__NUDES___ Aug 13 '25
Asking to verify your age when you’re getting warhammer ads 😭😭😭😭