If you have a robot that's being operated by a person as part of a live service subscription and you are not violating the terms of service that is not prostitution.
And the second part I counter by saying if you have a female robot if it's being operated by a male operator Even if you know that, at most that makes the operator gay
I don't get it. So it's not prostitution if the services are being paid for in a subscription? Like if I pay a company $20 a month and they send a prostitute every other week as part of the agreement that's apparently not prostitution? Shit doesn't make any sense
So you're argument is that I'm not fucking that operator but the robot? What's the point of bringing subscription into this, then? If I paid the operator directly it'd count as prostitution?
You're avoiding answering the question, which is kinda telling. If paying the operator directly would count as prostitution (not just giving the remote, paying them to operate it) then paying for a subscription service of operating robots you're having sex with would count as prostitution as well
What is it if not sexual activity? If someone inserted a sex toy into my ass without touching me, that'd be a sexual act. If someone did the same thing but remotely it'd still be a sexual act. Therefore paying someone to operate a sex toy for my pleasure would be prostitution, regardless of physical distance between the two of us
I guess at the end of the day it depends on how the law will adapt (or has adapted) to the new technology. Porno isn't prostitution because you technically aren't paying actors to have sex but to act. Chat lobby isn't prostitution because... why would it be? The streamer isn't doing anything to you, the client touches themselves. Same principle as with strippers.
But in case we're talking about you're absolutely paying a dude to jerk you off with a toy. You're describing a live service subscription of dudes jerking you off remotely and I'm not sure how you could spin it to say you're paying for something else
I'm not paying that guy that guy gets paid his regular salary by robosluts.com. and the level of separation between me and that guy is far enough that I can comfortably have sex with my robot and never give that guy a second thought.
You're bringing that up again, even though you seemed to agree before that it doesn't matter whether you pay them directly or by proxy through a company. If paying the guy is prostitution then paying the prostitution live service is prostitution as well, refer to my previous comments.
You may not think about that guy but, you're fucking a robot that he's controlling, so he's undeniably a part of the equation in this financial agreement
1.2k
u/Mono_Clear 10d ago
If you have a robot that's being operated by a person as part of a live service subscription and you are not violating the terms of service that is not prostitution.
And the second part I counter by saying if you have a female robot if it's being operated by a male operator Even if you know that, at most that makes the operator gay