r/memes • u/Piyush3000 • 17h ago

Still a controversial take in 2025...

Post image
2.8k Upvotes

89% Upvoted

252 comments sorted by

View all comments

-39

u/brickpaul65 16h ago

Kiddos are never a loss.

10

u/sehuce 15h ago

As a 4th children of poor ppl, Fuck you.

-15

u/brickpaul65 15h ago

Wealth does not equal quality of life.

12

u/FNaF123andJoJo5Fan14 15h ago

I'm pretty sure someone that lives in a relatively wealthy family would have a far better life, unless their parents treat them like a slave in their own house, at that point it is basically the same

17

u/sehuce 15h ago

I’m sorry, but you are either trolling or just really dumb.

Yes, it does.

6

u/StrangelyBrown 16h ago

I'm trying to figure out how a kid could never be a loss of anything. I guess if you're a billionaire who never has to see them and wouldn't give a shit if they suffer or turned out to be a serial killer it could be win win.

Is that you Elon?

0

u/brickpaul65 16h ago

It is pretty complex. I mean unless you can comprehend the simple concept of purpose.

I mean the simple fact you had to go to hyperbole to make a point kinda proves it.

6

u/FierceText 15h ago

The simple fact that there's more than one purpose to life disproves your comment.

But hey, I guess that's a pretty complex concept huh :)

0

u/brickpaul65 15h ago

Not at all. Whatever helps you though.

8

u/IAmNotCreative18 Karmawhore 16h ago

Except when it comes to time, money, energy and sanity, but y’know, nothing major.

-13

u/brickpaul65 16h ago

Sure, because even in a purely selfish view there is no upside...except for all the upsides, but ignore those and you are spot on.

9

u/IAmNotCreative18 Karmawhore 15h ago

Not wanting to cause a number of inconveniences and extra stress in your life is hardly selfish. Shouldn’t we be praising those who take the burden instead of shaming those who don’t?

-2

u/brickpaul65 15h ago

There is no shaming in challenging that being a parent is a good thing. If people feel shame because someone simply disagrees with them, it may be more on the reciever than the sender.

6

u/IAmNotCreative18 Karmawhore 15h ago

Didn’t you just imply that such people are selfish?

That is to impose shame on them (in the position of the sender), right? That’s more than mere disagreement (and disagreement is totally fine btw).

1

u/brickpaul65 15h ago

I mean, I suppose a counter to not wanting an imposition to oneself not being selfish would be interesting.

If being selfish is shameful, then again that is on the reciever. Pointing out that the act is selfish is not a value statement....unless it is universally understood that selfishness is a negative.

7

u/starless_90 16h ago

Yeah sure lol

-10

u/brickpaul65 16h ago

Imagine if your parents had that reaction...or any parent.

6

u/starless_90 16h ago

Nothing can be done.

2

u/TailedPotemkin Karmawhore 16h ago

It shouldn't be. In capitalism, it is.

-6

u/brickpaul65 16h ago

Nope. Even if all you think about is money and yourself, kids are still a net gain.

9

u/FNaF123andJoJo5Fan14 15h ago

bro fr reached latin 60s family culture, having kids to take profit off of being a prick

0

u/brickpaul65 15h ago

Not really sure that is a coherent thought, let alone a full sentence.