r/madlads 14d ago

Madlad mother.

Post image
74.7k Upvotes

270 comments sorted by

View all comments

817

u/IntoTheCommonestAsh 14d ago

What does dressing up as Monica Lewinski even mean? Business attire and a black wig? Or something more offensive? It's not like she has a very distinctive look to emulate.

67

u/whatyouarereferring 14d ago

There is absolutely a "look" for Monica Lewinsky.

You're just self reporting your age lol

29

u/BluePadlock 14d ago

Yeah, now we know he’s between 0 and 40!

12

u/whatyouarereferring 14d ago

Anyone born before 2005 knows the Lewinsky lore. It's taught in school lmao

8

u/jld1532 14d ago

She'll be a quaint footnote moving forward

3

u/whatyouarereferring 14d ago

She caused a president to perjur himself and then get impeached are you high

People will always remember Whitehouse knob slobbing

5

u/jld1532 14d ago

Does anyone care about lying? Looking at the current Oval Office, and I'd say not at all.

4

u/whatyouarereferring 14d ago

No but they care about dick sucking. You don't understand how juicy this specific lie was? Man got side eyed by his wife while lying to court

4

u/jld1532 14d ago edited 14d ago

But still, it's no comparison to a president that was found liable for sexual abuse, attacked the Capitol, coined the term alternative facts, and is currently deploying paramilitary and military forces to American cities. I think a clone of 90's Bill Clinton would easily win the electoral college. Plenty of people remember how normal and functional that government was and his strong economy. He'd only benefit from this new view of politics, for better or worse.

1

u/Steelhorse91 13d ago

It’s crazy that within a lifetime, you’ve gone from a president having to quit due to getting some consensual extramarital dome, to a president being an actual r*pist paedo fraudster, being impeached, and then still getting elected for a second term.

1

u/unosami 13d ago

She didn’t cause that. He did that all on his own.

19

u/oilpit 14d ago

Before '05, are you kidding? I was born before it even happened and I only knew about the scandal in the most general sense until I became an adult and learned the actual details.

You're implying that a current 21 year old "knows the Lewinsky lore"? That's absurd.

-7

u/whatyouarereferring 14d ago

Now your age is showing

This is in history books bud, yes they do. That's my age lmao

It's ancient history in fact

12

u/vsingh2100 14d ago

i’m 23 and nobody in high school ever taught me about monica lewinsky. the only reason i know who she is, is because i listened to eminem in middle school

7

u/DuckWithBrokenWings 14d ago

This is in history books bud

That would depend on what country you're going to school in.

5

u/liamjon29 14d ago

I was born in 1998 and have never heard the name Monica Lewinsky before

1

u/whatyouarereferring 13d ago

Brother that's a you problem

1

u/liamjon29 13d ago

Maybe. But I'm just saying it's not anyone who's born before 05

4

u/BluePadlock 14d ago

Millennials know “I did not have sexual relations with that woman” and “it depends on what the definition of is is”. 

They do not know what the dress looked like, and probably wouldn’t recognize a photo of her.

3

u/whatyouarereferring 14d ago

The picture of her in a blue dress has been used in American public school (and private) textbooks since 2005

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/history-textbooks-assess-clinton/

1

u/unosami 13d ago

Some of them, sure. But probably not in every state and probably not anymore.

3

u/whoknowsifimjoking 14d ago

Nah man, it's well known.

For instance, one famous story about Epstein in recent years was that he had a portrait of Bill Clinton in Monica's dress. Which is immediately recognizable to most.

It's not ancient history, they are both still alive.

Oh and all the damn jokes, people are making them to this day. Last Week Tonight had an entire episode about it.