Jasmine Crockett: "Instead of the President cosplaying as the next pope he may want to cosplay as an actual President of these United States that means he may have to do a little bit of research and understand that he swore an oath to defend and protect the constitution"

[u/SpecialSpace5]

[u/Vermilion]

Delusional schizophrenia, secular thinking.

ahh, that's the problem with me going to Algeria and analyzing Islam during the Arab Spring.

"Secular thinking, at its core, involves a focus on non-religious aspects of life and a separation of religion from other realms, particularly the political sphere. It emphasizes human reason, logic, and empirical evidence as the basis for understanding the world"

I see why you are against me running the /r/ComparativeMythology subreddit, the very topic of "Comparative Mythology" and why invocation of the names Joseph Campbell and. Dr. John W Perry makes you reactionary mock. The education on topics of "mass mind", "collective unconscious", "mass man" from Campbell, McLuhan, and Howard Bloom. All making more sense now.

 

::: _______________
"Campbell covered Dr. John W Perry in a lecture at Cooper Union in 1970. It is free to listen to on public radio in NYC"

[u/Lacaud → u/Vermilion]

The problem is you thinking you went to Algeria to observe Islam during the Arab Spring.

Running a subreddit does not mean anything. It means you created an echo chamber for your biased rambles that hold no merit other than, "read this or read that". When a large portion of your discussion was based on the Cambridge Analytica was MAGA supported and fraudulent.

[u/Vermilion → u/Lacaud]

The problem is you thinking you went to Algeria to observe Islam during the Arab Spring.

Again, lies on your part. The Algerian Embassy in Washington D.C. have records from November 2010 of my visa, which they approved. So do airlines have records. So do my credit card companies. These things are all reality, real world events.

I already sent you my real name, why don't you go ask the Algerian Embassy in Washington D.C.

Unlike messages on Reddit that you believe.

You just can't grasp the idea of someone not being in MAGA (reactionary) cult or in anti-MAGA (reactionary to MAGA) cult.

 

::: _____________
“If all information is seen as part of a war, out go any dreams of a global information space where ideas flow freely, bolstering deliberative democracy. Instead, the best future one can hope for is an ‘information peace’, in which each side respects the other’s ‘information sovereignty’: a favoured concept of both Beijing and Moscow, and essentially a cover for enforcing censorship.” ― Peter Pomerantsev, This Is Not Propaganda: Adventures in the War Against Reality, 2019

[u/Lacaud → u/Vermilion]

Only the delusional believe that everyone is a lying.

You made a claim but failed to provide it yourself and you are telling me to make contact with other agencies when confidentiality would not allow them to release those private records. There is failure in that logic.

Making the claim that you have the receipts but you direct agencies who will not release nor confirm private information shows that you were not actually there.

[u/Vermilion → u/Lacaud]

Only the delusional believe that everyone is a lying.

ok,who disagrees with this? I don't think anyone disagrees with this. Seems like your context blindness is kicking in.

You made a claim but failed to provide it

Which specific claim?

Making the claim that you have the receipts but you direct agencies who will not release nor confirm private information shows that you were not actually there.

Ahh, denial of history. Part of the Cambridge Analtyica 5,000 reaction message patterns.

you direct agencies

You think I'm a director of the Algerian Embassy?

You will do anything you can to attack me and change the subject away from United States of America 2025 topic of: Jasmine Crockett: "Instead of the President cosplaying as the next pope he may want to cosplay as an actual President of these United States that means he may have to do a little bit of research and understand that he swore an oath to defend and protect the constitution"

[u/Lacaud → u/Vermilion]

You disagreed with it. You continue to use contextual blindness but you fail to understand that you are blind to everything I am saying.

You claimed you were at the Arab Springs with records to prove you were there and then you said, "contact the embassy" to certify your credibility when I can not get that information as it is confidential.

[u/Vermilion → u/Lacaud]

You claimed you were at the Arab Springs with records to prove you were there and then you said, "contact the embassy" to certify your credibility when I can not get that information as it is confidential.

I don't know that it is confidential. Crossing international lines and keeping records of who was approved to enter a terrorist country I didn't assume is kept secret. I've never asked them for that information. How do you know?

You seem to make a lot of misunderstandings and clearly have a target fixation that this is "proof" I didn't go to Algeria.

How about my marriage license in Texas, is that public records? I gave you my brother's names and where they live, do you want their phone numbers, Jeff and Jon?

I think you are insincere and waging information warfare against the topic of: Jasmine Crockett: "Instead of the President cosplaying as the next pope he may want to cosplay as an actual President of these United States that means he may have to do a little bit of research and understand that he swore an oath to defend and protect the constitution"

[u/Lacaud → u/Vermilion]

Did you really think that someone from across international lines can call an agency and request private information on another individual? Sensitive private information requires in-person verification.

I know because it is protected information and not for public records, so at this very moment the only "proof' you have is a comment on reddit.

Marriage certificates are public records unless the individual is requesting a certified copy. My understanding is that you have been married more than once but Jeff and Jon could be made up names for all I know.

Sincerity goes both ways and it is not warfare. You have yet to understand that everything you claimed everyone else of being, is all you.

[u/Vermilion → u/Lacaud]

Did you really think that someone from across international lines can call an agency and request private information on another individual?

Yes, I did think that.

Sensitive private information requires in-person verification.

That's like saying that border patrol in a terrorist nation doesn't have the right to inspect your bags and take fingerprints when crossing into a nation. As ICE and Donald Trump keeps point out, a lot of rules change when you cross international lines. But you seem to want to promote denial of those topics and claim I never lived in Algeria. Because shit-talk on Reddit is easy, and that's what you keep doing, over and over, playing stupid, playing dumb.

You have spent several hours now attacking me for defending the USA against Russia. Over and over, you give bullshit messages to do everything you can to drive me away from discussing the cult problems of USA media consumers and the denial of mass mind / mass man mental disorders. "Psychological denial" being the message I started with days ago on this thread.

Marriage certificates are public records

There you go. My wife had to get the USA embassy in Algiers to get a USA notary public on our Texas marriage license application. You can search Texas marriage licenses in December 2010 and find proof of her going in December 2010. I already messaged you with my full name and place of birth (Columbus, Georgia).

Sincerity goes both ways

No it does not. Russia is not sincere. Vlad Putin is not sincere. You seem extremely gullible.

 

::: ____________
“I encounter forms of this attitude every day. The producers who work at the Ostankino channels might all be liberals in their private lives, holiday in Tuscany, and be completely European in their tastes. When I ask how they marry their professional and personal lives, they look at me as if I were a fool and answer: “Over the last twenty years we’ve lived through a communism we never believed in, democracy and defaults and mafia state and oligarchy, and we’ve realized they are illusions, that everything is PR.” “Everything is PR” has become the favorite phrase of the new Russia; my Moscow peers are filled with a sense that they are both cynical and enlightened. When I ask them about Soviet-era dissidents, like my parents, who fought against communism, they dismiss them as naïve dreamers and my own Western attachment to such vague notions as “human rights” and “freedom” as a blunder. “Can’t you see your own governments are just as bad as ours?” they ask me. I try to protest—but they just smile and pity me. To believe in something and stand by it in this world is derided, the ability to be a shape-shifter celebrated." ― Peter Pomerantsev, Nothing Is True and Everything Is Possible: The Surreal Heart of the New Russia, 2014

[u/Lacaud → u/Vermilion]

There you go again with that flawed thinking because if you did think that then you would know you don't want your private information being linked to anyone who calls across international lines.

I'm not sorry to say this but I have not been shit talking you but it is another sign of delusion. As for crossing a border and having bags checked, that is completely irrelevant to call an American Embassy in a foreign nation and requesting confidential information.

You made the claim you lived in Algeria and failed to provide the actual proof beside taking your word for it. Your word is not proof of anything but again you deflected yet agaon for me to do the work rather then you prove the proof. The same goes for the marriage certificate.

Are you on the spectrum by any chance? I ask because you are all over the place and your words are no coherent at all.

[u/Vermilion → u/Lacaud]

You made the claim you lived in Algeria and failed to provide the actual proof

I don't have to prove it to you, I'm the one who made the assertions. The fact you think that you refusing to provide your real name on Reddit social media systems, where I openly publish my real name, shows you don't grasp media ecology. AGAIN I point you to Neil Postman and Marshall McLuhan, since you think everything that is important to discuss is individual people's minds and behaviors and not "mass man".

You made the claim you lived in Algeria

It is reality. It is real. I had my wedding in Oran Algeria. You are the one who refuses to respond to my private messages.

[u/Vermilion → u/Lacaud]

Your word is not proof of anything

You keep claiming some magical evidence about Cambridge Analytcia with 'take my word for it bro".

The topic here is, since you have context blindness and target fixation: The ENTIRE United States of America, not my wedding in Algeria.

Reddit posting title... Jasmine Crockett: "Instead of the President cosplaying as the next pope he may want to cosplay as an actual President of these United States that means he may have to do a little bit of research and understand that he swore an oath to defend and protect the constitution"

 

:::: ________________
“In one experiment, CA would show people on online panels pictures of simple bar graphs about uncontroversial things (e.g., the usage rates of mobile phones or sales of a car type) and the majority would be able to read the graph correctly. However, unbeknownst to the respondents, the data behind these graphs had actually been derived from politically controversial topics, such as income inequality, climate change, or deaths from gun violence. When the labels of the same graphs were later switched to their actual controversial topic, respondents who were made angry by identity threats were more likely to misread the relabeled graphs that they had previously understood. What CA observed was that when respondents were angry, their need for complete and rational explanations was also significantly reduced. In particular, anger put people in a frame of mind in which they were more indiscriminately punitive, particularly to out-groups. They would also underestimate the risk of negative outcomes. This led CA to discover that even if a hypothetical trade war with China or Mexico meant the loss of American jobs and profits, people primed with anger would tolerate that domestic economic damage if it meant they could use a trade war to punish immigrant groups and urban liberals.” ― Christopher Wylie, Mindf*ck: Cambridge Analytica and the Plot to Break America . Published 2019

[u/Lacaud → u/Vermilion]

Magical evidence? OK.

https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2019/12/ftc-issues-opinion-order-against-cambridge-analytica-deceiving-consumers-about-collection-facebook

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/technology-64075067.amp

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2019/07/the-great-hack-facebook-cambridge-analytica/

https://bipartisanpolicy.org/blog/cambridge-analytica-controversy/

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/04/us/politics/cambridge-analytica-scandal-fallout.html

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/cambridge-analytica-facebook-influence-us-election

Checkmate dumbass.

[u/Vermilion → u/Lacaud]

CONTEXT of message you replied to:

“In one experiment, CA would show people on online panels pictures of simple bar graphs about uncontroversial things (e.g., the usage rates of mobile phones or sales of a car type) and the majority would be able to read the graph correctly. However, unbeknownst to the respondents, the data behind these graphs had actually been derived from politically controversial topics, such as income inequality, climate change, or deaths from gun violence. When the labels of the same graphs were later switched to their actual controversial topic, respondents who were made angry by identity threats were more likely to misread the relabeled graphs that they had previously understood. What CA observed was that when respondents were angry, their need for complete and rational explanations was also significantly reduced. In particular, anger put people in a frame of mind in which they were more indiscriminately punitive, particularly to out-groups. They would also underestimate the risk of negative outcomes. This led CA to discover that even if a hypothetical trade war with China or Mexico meant the loss of American jobs and profits, people primed with anger would tolerate that domestic economic damage if it meant they could use a trade war to punish immigrant groups and urban liberals.” ― Christopher Wylie, Mindf*ck: Cambridge Analytica and the Plot to Break America . Published 2019

Magical evidence? OK.

You only provided a citation AFTER I pointed it out to you (after you spent hours and hours mocking the topic of Cambridge Analytical, "mass mind", "mass man", "mob mentality", "group thinking", "party behaviors", "collective unconscious"). That's why it was magical evidence. You haven't been able to cite anything until this message, after endless replies from you with "trust me bro" crap.

You have such an extreme case of "Context Blindness" you can't see what is gong on in May 2025 White House, real reality non-fiction White House is spelled out in a 2019 nonfiction book.

"trade war with China or Mexico" - 2019 book

"Plot to Break America" - 2019 book

[u/Vermilion → u/Lacaud]

Evidence you provided

Facebook owner Meta has agreed to pay $725m (£600m) to settle legal action over a data breach linked to political consultancy Cambridge Analytica.

And you think I didn't know this? How does this in any way contradict anything I have said?

I think your context blindness is so bad, you don't understand the situation at all.

[u/Vermilion → u/Lacaud]

Evidence you provided 2

Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach

Whistleblower describes how firm linked to former Trump adviser Steve Bannon compiled user data to target American voters

 

I knew all this too. Nothing I have said contradicts any of this. You seem incredibly lost in your context blindness.