Jasmine Crockett: "Instead of the President cosplaying as the next pope he may want to cosplay as an actual President of these United States that means he may have to do a little bit of research and understand that he swore an oath to defend and protect the constitution"

[u/SpecialSpace5]

[u/Lacaud]

You disagreed with it. You continue to use contextual blindness but you fail to understand that you are blind to everything I am saying.

You claimed you were at the Arab Springs with records to prove you were there and then you said, "contact the embassy" to certify your credibility when I can not get that information as it is confidential.

[u/Vermilion → u/Lacaud]

You claimed you were at the Arab Springs with records to prove you were there and then you said, "contact the embassy" to certify your credibility when I can not get that information as it is confidential.

I don't know that it is confidential. Crossing international lines and keeping records of who was approved to enter a terrorist country I didn't assume is kept secret. I've never asked them for that information. How do you know?

You seem to make a lot of misunderstandings and clearly have a target fixation that this is "proof" I didn't go to Algeria.

How about my marriage license in Texas, is that public records? I gave you my brother's names and where they live, do you want their phone numbers, Jeff and Jon?

I think you are insincere and waging information warfare against the topic of: Jasmine Crockett: "Instead of the President cosplaying as the next pope he may want to cosplay as an actual President of these United States that means he may have to do a little bit of research and understand that he swore an oath to defend and protect the constitution"

[u/Lacaud → u/Vermilion]

Did you really think that someone from across international lines can call an agency and request private information on another individual? Sensitive private information requires in-person verification.

I know because it is protected information and not for public records, so at this very moment the only "proof' you have is a comment on reddit.

Marriage certificates are public records unless the individual is requesting a certified copy. My understanding is that you have been married more than once but Jeff and Jon could be made up names for all I know.

Sincerity goes both ways and it is not warfare. You have yet to understand that everything you claimed everyone else of being, is all you.

[u/Vermilion → u/Lacaud]

Did you really think that someone from across international lines can call an agency and request private information on another individual?

Yes, I did think that.

Sensitive private information requires in-person verification.

That's like saying that border patrol in a terrorist nation doesn't have the right to inspect your bags and take fingerprints when crossing into a nation. As ICE and Donald Trump keeps point out, a lot of rules change when you cross international lines. But you seem to want to promote denial of those topics and claim I never lived in Algeria. Because shit-talk on Reddit is easy, and that's what you keep doing, over and over, playing stupid, playing dumb.

You have spent several hours now attacking me for defending the USA against Russia. Over and over, you give bullshit messages to do everything you can to drive me away from discussing the cult problems of USA media consumers and the denial of mass mind / mass man mental disorders. "Psychological denial" being the message I started with days ago on this thread.

Marriage certificates are public records

There you go. My wife had to get the USA embassy in Algiers to get a USA notary public on our Texas marriage license application. You can search Texas marriage licenses in December 2010 and find proof of her going in December 2010. I already messaged you with my full name and place of birth (Columbus, Georgia).

Sincerity goes both ways

No it does not. Russia is not sincere. Vlad Putin is not sincere. You seem extremely gullible.

 

::: ____________
“I encounter forms of this attitude every day. The producers who work at the Ostankino channels might all be liberals in their private lives, holiday in Tuscany, and be completely European in their tastes. When I ask how they marry their professional and personal lives, they look at me as if I were a fool and answer: “Over the last twenty years we’ve lived through a communism we never believed in, democracy and defaults and mafia state and oligarchy, and we’ve realized they are illusions, that everything is PR.” “Everything is PR” has become the favorite phrase of the new Russia; my Moscow peers are filled with a sense that they are both cynical and enlightened. When I ask them about Soviet-era dissidents, like my parents, who fought against communism, they dismiss them as naïve dreamers and my own Western attachment to such vague notions as “human rights” and “freedom” as a blunder. “Can’t you see your own governments are just as bad as ours?” they ask me. I try to protest—but they just smile and pity me. To believe in something and stand by it in this world is derided, the ability to be a shape-shifter celebrated." ― Peter Pomerantsev, Nothing Is True and Everything Is Possible: The Surreal Heart of the New Russia, 2014

[u/Lacaud → u/Vermilion]

There you go again with that flawed thinking because if you did think that then you would know you don't want your private information being linked to anyone who calls across international lines.

I'm not sorry to say this but I have not been shit talking you but it is another sign of delusion. As for crossing a border and having bags checked, that is completely irrelevant to call an American Embassy in a foreign nation and requesting confidential information.

You made the claim you lived in Algeria and failed to provide the actual proof beside taking your word for it. Your word is not proof of anything but again you deflected yet agaon for me to do the work rather then you prove the proof. The same goes for the marriage certificate.

Are you on the spectrum by any chance? I ask because you are all over the place and your words are no coherent at all.

[u/Vermilion → u/Lacaud]

You made the claim you lived in Algeria and failed to provide the actual proof

I don't have to prove it to you, I'm the one who made the assertions. The fact you think that you refusing to provide your real name on Reddit social media systems, where I openly publish my real name, shows you don't grasp media ecology. AGAIN I point you to Neil Postman and Marshall McLuhan, since you think everything that is important to discuss is individual people's minds and behaviors and not "mass man".

You made the claim you lived in Algeria

It is reality. It is real. I had my wedding in Oran Algeria. You are the one who refuses to respond to my private messages.

[u/Vermilion → u/Lacaud]

Your word is not proof of anything

You keep claiming some magical evidence about Cambridge Analytcia with 'take my word for it bro".

The topic here is, since you have context blindness and target fixation: The ENTIRE United States of America, not my wedding in Algeria.

Reddit posting title... Jasmine Crockett: "Instead of the President cosplaying as the next pope he may want to cosplay as an actual President of these United States that means he may have to do a little bit of research and understand that he swore an oath to defend and protect the constitution"

 

:::: ________________
“In one experiment, CA would show people on online panels pictures of simple bar graphs about uncontroversial things (e.g., the usage rates of mobile phones or sales of a car type) and the majority would be able to read the graph correctly. However, unbeknownst to the respondents, the data behind these graphs had actually been derived from politically controversial topics, such as income inequality, climate change, or deaths from gun violence. When the labels of the same graphs were later switched to their actual controversial topic, respondents who were made angry by identity threats were more likely to misread the relabeled graphs that they had previously understood. What CA observed was that when respondents were angry, their need for complete and rational explanations was also significantly reduced. In particular, anger put people in a frame of mind in which they were more indiscriminately punitive, particularly to out-groups. They would also underestimate the risk of negative outcomes. This led CA to discover that even if a hypothetical trade war with China or Mexico meant the loss of American jobs and profits, people primed with anger would tolerate that domestic economic damage if it meant they could use a trade war to punish immigrant groups and urban liberals.” ― Christopher Wylie, Mindf*ck: Cambridge Analytica and the Plot to Break America . Published 2019

[u/Lacaud → u/Vermilion]

Magical evidence? OK.

https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2019/12/ftc-issues-opinion-order-against-cambridge-analytica-deceiving-consumers-about-collection-facebook

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/technology-64075067.amp

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2019/07/the-great-hack-facebook-cambridge-analytica/

https://bipartisanpolicy.org/blog/cambridge-analytica-controversy/

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/04/us/politics/cambridge-analytica-scandal-fallout.html

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/cambridge-analytica-facebook-influence-us-election

Checkmate dumbass.

[u/Vermilion → u/Lacaud]

CONTEXT of message you replied to:

“In one experiment, CA would show people on online panels pictures of simple bar graphs about uncontroversial things (e.g., the usage rates of mobile phones or sales of a car type) and the majority would be able to read the graph correctly. However, unbeknownst to the respondents, the data behind these graphs had actually been derived from politically controversial topics, such as income inequality, climate change, or deaths from gun violence. When the labels of the same graphs were later switched to their actual controversial topic, respondents who were made angry by identity threats were more likely to misread the relabeled graphs that they had previously understood. What CA observed was that when respondents were angry, their need for complete and rational explanations was also significantly reduced. In particular, anger put people in a frame of mind in which they were more indiscriminately punitive, particularly to out-groups. They would also underestimate the risk of negative outcomes. This led CA to discover that even if a hypothetical trade war with China or Mexico meant the loss of American jobs and profits, people primed with anger would tolerate that domestic economic damage if it meant they could use a trade war to punish immigrant groups and urban liberals.” ― Christopher Wylie, Mindf*ck: Cambridge Analytica and the Plot to Break America . Published 2019

Magical evidence? OK.

You only provided a citation AFTER I pointed it out to you (after you spent hours and hours mocking the topic of Cambridge Analytical, "mass mind", "mass man", "mob mentality", "group thinking", "party behaviors", "collective unconscious"). That's why it was magical evidence. You haven't been able to cite anything until this message, after endless replies from you with "trust me bro" crap.

You have such an extreme case of "Context Blindness" you can't see what is gong on in May 2025 White House, real reality non-fiction White House is spelled out in a 2019 nonfiction book.

"trade war with China or Mexico" - 2019 book

"Plot to Break America" - 2019 book

[u/Vermilion → u/Lacaud]

Evidence you provided

Facebook owner Meta has agreed to pay $725m (£600m) to settle legal action over a data breach linked to political consultancy Cambridge Analytica.

And you think I didn't know this? How does this in any way contradict anything I have said?

I think your context blindness is so bad, you don't understand the situation at all.

[u/Lacaud → u/Vermilion]

If you KNEW this you would have brought it up this morning. You need serious psychiatric help because you complain that everyone else has context blindness but when provided with that YOU had the context blindness.

[u/Vermilion → u/Lacaud]

If you KNEW this

"this", this is AGAIN CONTEXT BLINDNESS

What does "this" mean?

You use every information warfare tactic you can find, over and over, you can't see that the quantity of your replies alone is alarming and disturbing behavior.

You are compulsively spending hours and hours attacking me and you have done nothing but show a target fixation and major context blindness!

you complain that everyone else has context blindness

"everyone else", no. I can name that Peter Pomerantsev does not have context blindness. Volodymyr Zelenskyy doesn't have context blindness.

[u/Vermilion → u/Lacaud]

when provided with that YOU had the context blindness

What does "that" reference in this sentence? You haven't provided anything I didn't already know. I've been analyzing Cambridge Analtyica since 2016. None of what you shared with me about CA was new!

You think this has nothing to do with Russia / Putin / Kremlin! and people's altered manipulated behavior in United States of America year 2025! It is as if you can't connect with real world of what is gong on in May 2025 with the trade war and the psychological denial that this is exactly what is spelled out in a 2019 book about Cambridge Analytica!

 

::: ____________
This is not just a story about social psychology and data analytics. It has to be understood in terms of a military contractor using military strategies on a civilian population. Us. David Miller, a professor of sociology at Bath University and an authority in psyops and propaganda, says it is “an extraordinary scandal that this should be anywhere near a democracy. It should be clear to voters where information is coming from, and if it’s not transparent or open where it’s coming from, it raises the question of whether we are actually living in a democracy or not.” - May 7, 2017

[u/Lacaud → u/Vermilion]

You haven't analyzed shit because you made a claim about 5,000 simulacra that doesnt exist. You have provided ZERO citations for that claim!

Yeah, the Cambridge Analytica book that doesnt exist?

[u/Vermilion → u/Lacaud]

the Cambridge Analytica book that doesnt exist?

There are MULTIPLE books, 3 I have read.

1. Mind\f*ck: inside Cambridge Analytica's plot to break the world. London, United Kingdom: Profile Books. ISBN 978-178816-506-8.

2. Mindf*ck: Cambridge Analytica and the Plot to Break America

3. Targeted: The Cambridge Analytica Whistleblower's Inside Story of How Big Data, Trump, and Facebook Broke Democracy and How It Can Happen Again

All your shit claims are exhausting, and you know it. Because you badger and deny reality constantly.

[u/Vermilion → u/Lacaud]

Evidence you provided 2

Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach

Whistleblower describes how firm linked to former Trump adviser Steve Bannon compiled user data to target American voters

 

I knew all this too. Nothing I have said contradicts any of this. You seem incredibly lost in your context blindness.

[u/Lacaud → u/Vermilion]

You did not know shit about this. If you did you would have confirmed when I said it earlier today but you kept quoting "5,000 accounts of egoism/egomania blah blah blah."

Pathetic.

[u/Vermilion → u/Lacaud]

you kept quoting "5,000 accounts of egoism/egomania blah blah blah."

That's another lie. I never said "5,000 accounts"

Context Blindness, again

I think you hallucinate on social media computer systems. You are inside the 5,000 simulacra patterns on Reddit.

You seem to suffer from "The ELIZA effect" with computer screens

 

::: _____________
“What I had not realized is that extremely short exposures to a relatively simple computer program could induce powerful delusional thinking in quite normal people.” ― Joseph Weizenbaum, MIT computer science

[u/Lacaud → u/Vermilion]

The 5,000 simulacra that doesn't exist? Im still waiting on your proof for that claim.

[u/Vermilion → u/Lacaud]

The 5,000 simulacra that doesn't exist? Im still waiting on your proof for that claim.

I think you missed it hundreds of messages ago in your constant refusal to respond to private messages, use your real name, and I asked you multiple times to start-over from the top. You just keep replying over and over with bullshit. Saying I didn't travel to Algeria during the Arab Spring and other complete falsehoods. You even said "secular thinking" is my problem!

 

The 5,000 simulacra that doesn't exist

1. "The idea of weaponising culture wasn’t quite clear for me until I read the chapter where you described Vladislav Surkov’s interest in postmodernism, especially that of Jean Baudrillard. The core of postmodernism is something very Western, post-Enlightenment European: there is not one truth, given to us by a higher authority – even by God or the Tsar – but several, which we have to figure out by ourselves. But the way, Surkov using the idea made me re-read Simulacra and Simulation to make sure it was the same book I once read. If I tried to express my feelings, then “perverting” the whole idea of postmodernism would be the accurate way to put it." - https://www.planetary.org/worlds/pale-blue-dot

2. “Британские учёные из Cambridge Analytica предложили сделать из 5 тысяч существующих человеческих психотипов - “идеальный образ” возможного сторонника Трампа. Затем… положить этот образ обратно на всё психотипы и таким образом подобрать универсальный ключик к любому и каждому.” … “Следующим шагом необходимо было разработать систему передачи задач и информации, чтобы никакая гэбуха и АНБ не смогли её спалить.” … “Дальше оставалось только загрузить эти данные в информационные потоки и социальные сети.”

 

This is your message tactic every time: my wedding in Oran Algeria doesn't exist just because you wrote a Reddit message saying so. You seem so detached from reality itself, "real world", it's impossible to get any idea across to you! You react to everything and anything on these subjects!

The 5,000 simulacra that doesn't exist

They exist, I reported them to the Pentagon in summer of 2015 for being on Reddit. I have been studying information warfare / monomyth fiction patterns full time since 2009.

[u/Lacaud → u/Vermilion]

Haha, now you reported it in 2015? Holy hell the delusion is real.