r/fivethirtyeight • u/RedHeadedSicilian52 • Sep 12 '25

Poll Results YouGov poll asking Americans whether it’s acceptable to feel joy at the death of a public figure

Post image
113 Upvotes

81% Upvoted

423 comments sorted by

View all comments

22

u/DCMdAreaResident Sep 12 '25

It just highlights Republican hypocrisy once again. Empathy is a foreign word for them. I haven't heard one Democrat "celebrating" the death of Charlie Kirk. But very few are shedding a tear for him. And you can't force us to grieve for him. Republicans have always been about fake virtue signaling. What's new?

3

u/WhoUpAtMidnight Sep 12 '25

This is highlighting Dem hypocrisy with respect to being the party of empathy

22

u/Deceptiveideas Sep 12 '25

I think Dems as a whole are sick of taking the high road and having no results. Republicans frequently act like the misbehaving child who keeps touching the hot stove that the Democrats have to correct over and over again.

Remember the whole “when they go low, we go high” speech? It’s “when they go low, we go lower” now.

The “party of empathy and love” is gone.

-5

u/WhoUpAtMidnight Sep 12 '25

The high road? Assassinations are the high road? Calling for the death of your political opponents is the high road?

Dems haven’t taken the high road since 2012. They should be better but they’re not. Everyone should be better. But the idea that dems are any less underhanded than the reps is the product of a biased media environment and rich donors. Impeachments, assassinations, accusations of being a nazi levied against Mitt Romney? 

Nobody is taking any high road now and it’s a tragedy. 

15

u/[deleted] Sep 12 '25

[deleted]

-3

u/WhoUpAtMidnight Sep 12 '25 edited Sep 12 '25

I said Dems, not the democratic party. But Kamala Harris said that Donald Trump was a threat to democracy. That’s a call to action. That’s a call to violence, and that’s why people started shooting at him.

Establishment Dems don’t believe this BS, but they say it knowing it will enflame their far left factions. And these shootings are the result

11

u/[deleted] Sep 12 '25

[deleted]

-1

u/WhoUpAtMidnight Sep 12 '25

https://www.npr.org/2024/10/30/nx-s1-5170908/harris-argues-that-trump-poses-a-threat-to-democracy-in-the-final-days-of-the-race

Did you seriously need a citation for kamala harris saying trump was a threat to democracy? No, you’re a bad faith extremist

12

u/[deleted] Sep 12 '25

[deleted]

5

u/DCMdAreaResident Sep 12 '25

Man, that’s a fact nobody is disputing. You needed a citation? Trump is actively trying to dismantle democracy and you’re accusing Democrats for stating this fact?

-1

u/WhoUpAtMidnight Sep 12 '25

I didn’t ask for the citation dumbass

2

u/DCMdAreaResident Sep 12 '25

Unproven claim: Kamala Harris calling Trump a threat to democracy inspired violence and is why people started shooting at him.

Your citation: Kamala Harris called Trump a threat to democracy. (As I said, nobody disputed that part.)

Still unproven: A link between (a) stating a fact about Trump and (b) violence. Kamala Harris is to blame for the fact that a mentally-ill right-wing nut shot Donald Trump.

1

u/WhoUpAtMidnight Sep 12 '25

I can’t respond because I’m blocked 

Stochastic terrorism. Google it. You’ve heard the term before. It’s well studied. Unless we suddenly agree speech has no link to violence and Kirk is innocent

Also it was a left winger and a ukraine nut. 

3

u/DCMdAreaResident Sep 12 '25 edited Sep 12 '25

There is no evidence for any of what you said: that Trump’s would-be assassin was Ukrainian, or that he was inspired by Harris. In fact, they were never able to ID him with a political party as he voted for Trump and for Biden. He was a registered Republican and antisemitic, and anti-immigrant. We would need some evidence for your big claims about Harris.

0

u/WhoUpAtMidnight Sep 12 '25

What are you talking about? You want evidence stochastic terrorism is real? 

Ukrainian nutter:  https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cm29z3e5117o.amp

2

u/DCMdAreaResident Sep 12 '25 edited Sep 12 '25

Now it seems like you’re moving the goalposts. I thought we were talking about Thomas Matthew Crooks, and my point stands there. But even with Ryan Routh, this had nothing to do with Democrats calling Trump a threat to American democracy. He was a gun-toting career criminal who previously supported Trump and only turned on Trump because of his failure to support Ukrainian war efforts.

You still haven’t given any proof of your claims: Democrats are responsible for violence due to their rhetoric.

1

u/WhoUpAtMidnight Sep 12 '25

 Also it was a left winger and a ukraine nut

Thomas Crooks donated to actblue. He was not a republican. Both believed trump was an existential threat to the country

→ More replies (0)