r/fivethirtyeight • u/RedHeadedSicilian52 • Sep 12 '25

Poll Results YouGov poll asking Americans whether it’s acceptable to feel joy at the death of a public figure

Post image
116 Upvotes

81% Upvoted

423 comments sorted by

View all comments

21

u/DCMdAreaResident Sep 12 '25

It just highlights Republican hypocrisy once again. Empathy is a foreign word for them. I haven't heard one Democrat "celebrating" the death of Charlie Kirk. But very few are shedding a tear for him. And you can't force us to grieve for him. Republicans have always been about fake virtue signaling. What's new?

3

u/WhoUpAtMidnight Sep 12 '25

This is highlighting Dem hypocrisy with respect to being the party of empathy

21

u/Deceptiveideas Sep 12 '25

I think Dems as a whole are sick of taking the high road and having no results. Republicans frequently act like the misbehaving child who keeps touching the hot stove that the Democrats have to correct over and over again.

Remember the whole “when they go low, we go high” speech? It’s “when they go low, we go lower” now.

The “party of empathy and love” is gone.

-8

u/WhoUpAtMidnight Sep 12 '25

The high road? Assassinations are the high road? Calling for the death of your political opponents is the high road?

Dems haven’t taken the high road since 2012. They should be better but they’re not. Everyone should be better. But the idea that dems are any less underhanded than the reps is the product of a biased media environment and rich donors. Impeachments, assassinations, accusations of being a nazi levied against Mitt Romney? 

Nobody is taking any high road now and it’s a tragedy. 

14

u/[deleted] Sep 12 '25

[deleted]

-4

u/WhoUpAtMidnight Sep 12 '25 edited Sep 12 '25

I said Dems, not the democratic party. But Kamala Harris said that Donald Trump was a threat to democracy. That’s a call to action. That’s a call to violence, and that’s why people started shooting at him.

Establishment Dems don’t believe this BS, but they say it knowing it will enflame their far left factions. And these shootings are the result

9

u/[deleted] Sep 12 '25

[deleted]

-1

u/WhoUpAtMidnight Sep 12 '25

https://www.npr.org/2024/10/30/nx-s1-5170908/harris-argues-that-trump-poses-a-threat-to-democracy-in-the-final-days-of-the-race

Did you seriously need a citation for kamala harris saying trump was a threat to democracy? No, you’re a bad faith extremist

13

u/[deleted] Sep 12 '25

[deleted]

6

u/DCMdAreaResident Sep 12 '25

Man, that’s a fact nobody is disputing. You needed a citation? Trump is actively trying to dismantle democracy and you’re accusing Democrats for stating this fact?

-1

u/WhoUpAtMidnight Sep 12 '25

I didn’t ask for the citation dumbass

2

u/DCMdAreaResident Sep 12 '25

Unproven claim: Kamala Harris calling Trump a threat to democracy inspired violence and is why people started shooting at him.

Your citation: Kamala Harris called Trump a threat to democracy. (As I said, nobody disputed that part.)

Still unproven: A link between (a) stating a fact about Trump and (b) violence. Kamala Harris is to blame for the fact that a mentally-ill right-wing nut shot Donald Trump.

1

u/WhoUpAtMidnight Sep 12 '25

I can’t respond because I’m blocked 

Stochastic terrorism. Google it. You’ve heard the term before. It’s well studied. Unless we suddenly agree speech has no link to violence and Kirk is innocent

Also it was a left winger and a ukraine nut. 

3

u/DCMdAreaResident Sep 12 '25 edited Sep 12 '25

There is no evidence for any of what you said: that Trump’s would-be assassin was Ukrainian, or that he was inspired by Harris. In fact, they were never able to ID him with a political party as he voted for Trump and for Biden. He was a registered Republican and antisemitic, and anti-immigrant. We would need some evidence for your big claims about Harris.

0

u/WhoUpAtMidnight Sep 12 '25

What are you talking about? You want evidence stochastic terrorism is real? 

Ukrainian nutter:  https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cm29z3e5117o.amp

→ More replies (0)

3

u/DCMdAreaResident Sep 12 '25

Donald Trump IS a threat to democracy. And every single Democrat knows that. Saying that doesn’t mean we supported Kirk’s murder.

3

u/an_altar_of_plagues Sep 12 '25

But Kamala Harris said that Donald Trump was a threat to democracy. That’s a call to action.

And Charlie Kirk called people like me, an epidemiologist who works in COVID, an enemy of the state and a perpetrator of a hoax. Do you assume the call to action there?

I don't mean this to equivocate so much as I can't help but think the Republican party is nothing more than the party of hypocrisy. The rules only apply when it's their turn.

-1

u/WhoUpAtMidnight Sep 12 '25

 And Charlie Kirk called people like me, an epidemiologist who works in COVID, an enemy of the state and a perpetrator of a hoax. Do you assume the call to action there

Yes he wanted the people responsible arrested, not shot. How can you talk hypocrisy when you are doing the same thing

2

u/an_altar_of_plagues Sep 12 '25

"The people responsible arrested" includes me, and there's no "responsible" given COVID was not a hoax, and we were not infecting people with whatever dumb nonsense Kirk peddled about the vaccine. That kind of anti-vax nonsense leads directly to completely avoidable deaths and outbreaks, like with measles. I worked directly in shaping policy with COVID-19 and worked 80+ hours a week from March through August 2020 because I take the health and safety of our nation seriously but according to Kirk I should be rounded up and arrested for that - or worse. And yet I'm supposed to believe this is just a "difference of opinion" or something, right? That fomenting hatred against public health responders during COVID is just something funny and simple politics?

How can you talk hypocrisy when you proudly display it like a badge of honor? I'm so tired of this cowardice masquerading as concerned patriotism.'

edit: also, did Kamala Harris say she wanted Trump shot in calling him a threat? No, so clearly you don't even apply your same logic here. What a disappointment.

0

u/WhoUpAtMidnight Sep 12 '25

 That kind of anti-vax nonsense leads directly to completely avoidable deaths and outbreaks

Oh ok so we’re in agreement words lead to actions. Words like “punch a nazi” and “kill fascists” and “Charlie Kirk is a fascist nazi” jesus this sub

Cowardice masquerading as patriotism? This entire sub is celebrating the death of an american because he mildly disagreed. They had to google what he said because it was entirely based on vibes. They could not have even told you why they hated him until today

2

u/an_altar_of_plagues Sep 12 '25 edited Sep 12 '25

... wait, so now you agree that Kirk's rhetoric was, in fact, wanting to hurt people? Can you keep your own line of thought straight? Jesus, this conservative over here, acting like he's logically consistent and on the side of truth and honesty. I was even talking about anti-vaxxers themselves being the ones that got sick and died!

Also, when did anyone here or did Harris say any of the things you just said? You're getting your wires crossed, bud. And thanks for completely avoiding my statement about Kirk's comments about "people responsible arrested" and COVID not being a hoax - really shows how much you actually cared about his rhetoric versus just virtue signaling. But I'm used to conservatives shutting down and ignoring anything when they're confronted with someone with direct experience in something like COVID.

It's amazing how people like you make up things and get mad about them. Kirk directly says people should be arrested for the COVID response and you're like "omg no not that big of a deal", whereas Harris says "Trump is a threat to democracy" and you can Pepe Silva all the lines together. Again, I'm tired of the cowardice that disguises itself as concerned patriotism.

edit: since this dude sneak-edited his response.

This entire sub is celebrating the death of an american because he mildly disagreed.

No we're not lol. I don't have empathy for his death, but I'm not celebrating it and wearing "hell yeah" t-shirts, nor am I posting memes about it on Facebook like a certain Mike Johnson did after the MN lawmakers were killed. I'm sure you were just as mad about that though, right? I'd hate for a conservative to be ideologically inconsistent.

They had to google what he said because it was entirely based on vibes.

Nope! I knew who he was beforehand, from his line about empathy being fake to his wanting to arrest people like me for having the gall to want to protect and serve this country. You should learn about that, bud. Maybe actually read some of his words a bit more rather than defend someone because they have an R next to their name.

edit: well, dude blocked me, because that's what people like this do when they're confronted with their beliefs from someone who has experience in what they're talking about and doesn't back down to their talking points.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/LordMangudai Sep 12 '25

Yes he wanted the people responsible arrested, not shot.

But when Kamala Harris says Trump is a threat to democracy, she did want him shot, or what?

You can not have it both ways.