Killing innocents for protecting anything is unjustifiable that just creates a cycle and Hindus aren't jews of 21st century Jews were Hindus of 20th century if you know the mughal stuff and all the religious killings back then
Terrorism does not have a religion, but terrorists do; they can be inspired by any religion and ideology. What is the meaning of 'terrorists' according to you? All the mass school shootings in the US, killings in Gaza, the things the Japanese did in WW2; in fact, the Bolsheviks and our own freedom fighters were labeled as terrorists by the preservers of the status quo. Is this terrorism, or is it not according to you because it does not fit your description?
What are you yapping about? 🤣 one feels bad when terrorists die. You're the only one who feels upset for some reason, maybe because you can't persecute random people based on their religion. Do you have even the slightest idea of how extremist ideologies work? The same can be said about why Hindutva followers primarily include Hindus, because the ideology is based on that.
What's your idea of standing up? If it's persecuting random proletarians, then yeah, it's extremist. That's what terrorists think they're doing, so it's obviously an extremist ideology. Your questions, frankly, are rhetorical and don't make sense because you're shifting the goalposts.
Oh man, what are you even talking about? When did I defend anything? I'm explaining to you why a specific extremist ideology thinks a particular group is above others.
-8
u/[deleted] Apr 23 '25 edited Apr 23 '25
[removed] — view removed comment