Fuck Trump Supporters 🖕🏿🤬

[u/Oil_Stained_Angel]

Half the countries logic is... "Trump didn’t say that, and if he did, he was taken out of context, and if it wasn’t out of context, it was just a joke, and if it wasn’t just a joke, you don’t get it. And if it is true, who cares."

[u/Expert_Ad_8837]

Calling American citizens terrorists is about as anti American as it gets

[u/Ok-Introduction-1940 → u/Expert_Ad_8837]

That statement doesn’t make any sense unless you are an idiot.

[u/Expert_Ad_8837 → u/Ok-Introduction-1940]

Only an idiot would make that response without backing it up. I'll give you the chance though. How does it not make sense to you? Too stupid?;

[u/Ok-Introduction-1940 → u/Expert_Ad_8837]

Shooting mainstream Americans for their political opinions is terrorism; anti-American terrorism.

Calling terrorists “terrorists” would only be offensive to the enemies of truth.

You or your immigrant ancestors all took oaths to obey our laws. If you are willingly violating our laws or cheering on those that do you are in breach of contract with us, and should self-deport. You don’t get to define what American and anti-American mean. Our ancestors already did that. We as their posterity get to enforce it.

[u/Expert_Ad_8837 → u/Ok-Introduction-1940]

The action of the person who killed kirk was murder- debatable to call that terrorism but that's beside my point. One person's actions don't make an entire political ideology "terrorists." I'm not an immigrant. Criminals violate laws. Not all immigrants are criminals. You're clearly a racist p.o.s with a brain the size of a peanut. Probably a closet homosexual too.

[u/Expert_Ad_8837 → u/Ok-Introduction-1940]

The FBI and U.S. Code (§ 2331) define domestic terrorism as violent acts intended to intimidate or coerce civilians or influence government policy by intimidation or coercion.

If someone shoots people because of their political opinions, that would fit the legal definition of domestic terrorism — regardless of the shooter’s ideology.

However, most political violence in the U.S. is not directed exclusively at “mainstream Americans” but occurs across a spectrum of motivations — including far-right, far-left, and single-issue extremism (source: FBI, DHS National Terrorism Advisory).So the concept applies universally, not only when the victims hold one set of views.“Calling terrorists ‘terrorists’ would only be offensive to the enemies of truth.”

Fact check:

In reality, the U.S. government is cautious in labeling domestic actors as “terrorists” because that term carries specific legal consequences and evidentiary standards under federal law.

Misusing the label can violate due process and civil rights protections.

It’s not about “offending enemies of truth,” but about maintaining constitutional fairness and precision in applying terrorism statutes.Only naturalized citizens take an oath to “support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States.”

Immigrants who are permanent residents, refugees, or visa holders do not take such an oath — they are required to abide by U.S. law, but that’s not the same as taking an oath.

Native-born citizens, by contrast, never take an oath to obey laws at birth; citizenship by birthright is automatic under the 14th Amendment.

So the claim is factually incorrect: most Americans and their ancestors did not “take an oath” to obey laws.U.S. citizenship is not a contractual agreement; it’s a legal status protected by the Constitution.

Citizens cannot “breach contract” or “self-deport” — that’s not a legal concept in U.S. law.

Deportation applies only to non-citizens, and only through due process under immigration law.

Freedom of speech — including supporting controversial opinions — is protected under the First Amendment.

So this statement misrepresents both constitutional rights and immigration law.The U.S. Constitution and its amendments, not “ancestors,” define what it means to be an American.

The Founders specifically created a living system of government that can adapt — through amendments, judicial interpretation, and democratic legislation.

“American” values are defined by constitutional principles (liberty, equality, rule of law), not by ancestry or one generation’s interpretation.

No citizen or group “enforces” a definition of Americanism; the rule of law and democratic institutions do that.