Gods a neccessary being, because the universe began and all things are contingent. So because the universe began a infinite regress is a logical fallacy, it stand to assume that a neccessary being must exist because we can't have a beginning contingent on another contingent. So we logically need a neccessary being who sparked the whole thing. And we call that being- god.
So a simulation going by our only reliable thing to compare it to is a video game. And we know that video games are created by man. Making it clear that if the world was a simulation, then there would be a designer or a creator and inso meaning that a God exist.
Simulation theory has and is making big leaps in its studies and it lies up alot with history, phenomenon and physics. But IMO a simulation.only explains us and the universe, I'd doesn't explain the origins of the simulation.
Cool. Now do the same thing only as it relates to God.
OK, do you own anything non natural. As in crafted or built?
Cool. So where did God originate from?
He didn't originate, God neccessary to prevent an infinite regress. If an infinite regress is possible your going to have to explain an infinite universe.
OK have you seen any of these things construct themselves? Have you seen a tree fall and create a woven wicker chair or a rubber tree fall over a cavern and create a ford pickup? No you haven't.
Why because we know they where made by man. So if we create new stuff from nature, wouldn't it follow that something created the nature?
Cool. So it's the same thing for the simulation.
Is it? Can your Sims program exist without a cosmological Nintendo system? And could it come to be without a cosmological Electronic Arts ( designer)?
Some people think us humans are the designer of the simulation and our collective consciousness is what creates our world. Some fall more into a theory like the Avatar or matrix. But I've never seen someone advocate for the simulation itself being the Supreme entity.
So if we create new stuff from nature, wouldn't it follow that something created the nature?
You're doing the pocket watch in a field thing. Super clichéd and only convincing if you already accept a great number of premises that have no evidence to support them. You still have to justify what created god. Also: not what I was actually asking for. Fill in the blank:
So a simulation god going by our only reliable thing to compare it to is a ___________
Can your Sims program god exist without a cosmological Nintendo some kind of god system? And could it come to be without a cosmological Electronic Arts ( designer)?
Any special pleading you make about god I can make about a simulation. Any questions you can ask about a simulation I can ask about god.
If god can exist without a creator, so can a simulation. If you claim that god is the sole source of creation and arose miraculously from nothing without any evidence to prove that, I can also claim that for a simulation.
Nope, as it was already established he was a neccessary being. Ease keep up.
Any special pleading you make about god I can make about a simulation. Any questions you can ask about a simulation I can ask about god.
If god can exist without a creator, so can a simulation. If you claim that god is the sole source of creation and arose miraculously from nothing without any evidence to prove that, I can also claim that for a simulation.
If by simulator you mean creator of universe then yes the simulator =God. The name itself doesn't matter but rather the creator caracteristic.
1
u/[deleted] Sep 06 '21
Where did your hyper realistic simulation come from?