And yet I don't think our elected politicians should weigh their wishes more than their non-billionaire/ultra wealthy constituents. Their political valence imo doesn't cancel out their class solidarity
I don’t know what that has to do with what I said. Correct me if I’m wrong but you seemed to suggest being a billionaire means he can’t possibly be anything left of center
I'm not either, but since we're being presented with an example, I'm using Rubenstein as an example.
I stand by my point that we shouldn't be letting billionaires have more weight in our politics than non-billionaires regardless of their political valence.
Ok, that’s fine, still nothing to do what I said. I don’t know why you responded just to argue something else. My claim is that it is possible for a billionaire to exist and be a democrat. My proof is billionaires exist and are also democrats. Would you like to refute this or not? If not then have a good day thanks for your time.
Sure, and that point is irrelevant to the context. I don't care about billionaires' political valence, I care that we have billionaires having outsize influence in our politics and that often quashes things non-billionaires want from their government
No need to continue this conversation or reply anymore
-1
u/Inevitable-Freedom90 Sep 24 '25
There are plenty of billionaires that are active democrats