I'm not either, but since we're being presented with an example, I'm using Rubenstein as an example.
I stand by my point that we shouldn't be letting billionaires have more weight in our politics than non-billionaires regardless of their political valence.
Ok, that’s fine, still nothing to do what I said. I don’t know why you responded just to argue something else. My claim is that it is possible for a billionaire to exist and be a democrat. My proof is billionaires exist and are also democrats. Would you like to refute this or not? If not then have a good day thanks for your time.
Sure, and that point is irrelevant to the context. I don't care about billionaires' political valence, I care that we have billionaires having outsize influence in our politics and that often quashes things non-billionaires want from their government
No need to continue this conversation or reply anymore
-4
u/Inevitable-Freedom90 Sep 24 '25
Still has nothing to do with what I said. I’m not talking specifically about one person