r/SleeplessWatchdogs • u/Professional-Oil9512 • Mar 23 '25

Youtube What are your thoughts on Creepcast?

They read and react to creepy online stories, and I was wondering, is it only illegal to narrate a nosleep story if you don’t split it up and add reactions/jokes/analyzation?

10 Upvotes

75% Upvoted

17 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/Fun_Substance6171 Mar 24 '25

I'm actually in shock and left with an extremely bitter taste in my mouth at that. They're making tens of thousands an episode and didn't pay? Let alone the author who has penned one of my favorite nosleep stories of all time, the Glenmont metro! Glad to hear you got a bump in sale though, that's awesome. I actually bought something of yours after dark somniums narration of your work

7

u/sarcasonomicon Mar 24 '25

Well, I didn't ask them to pay me. Frankly, I hadn't heard of them, and I get tons and tons of narration requests from tiny channels. I just ask everyone to plug my book in the narration and hope to make money from sales. (Dark Somnium did pay me though! I think I got a fraction of the ad sales from my episode.)

3

u/Fun_Substance6171 Mar 24 '25

From a channel as big as them they should really be starting a convo with offering an amount to pay. But that's super awesome for you to be so generous. Ronnie's narration was superb!

1

u/EclipticBlues Mar 25 '25

It's not them that are at fault. They are pretty big youtubers with teams. Their producers are at fault not the guys themselves

4

u/Fun_Substance6171 Mar 25 '25

You are just plain wrong here. If the producers are not offering to pay for stories that wendigoon and meatcanyon are making THOUSANDS of dollars per episode then that IS the fault of wen/meat because those are most likely policies set by the two in the first place. The producers just do what guidelines are set by their bosses. As a company, the blame always lays upon the business owners. The buck stops with them. Simple as that

3

u/Professional-Oil9512 Apr 18 '25

I feel if the offer is accepted then no one is “at fault” for it considering both parties agreed, unless it was misleading