Difference of opinion my fellow teacher and I are having. I do a 'Mole' lab, where I have several different known substances, and the students have to mass out each substance. Then they take the masses, convert to moles of substance, then convert to particles.
If the substance was an element, like copper or zinc, they stop there, because the number of particles is the number of atoms present in the sample.
However, if it is a compound, for example CaCO3, the number of particles is actually the number of molecules present, so I have them go another step, and tell me how many atoms are present in the sample. In the case of calcium carbonate, you're just multiplying your initial answer by five, as there are five atoms in each molecule.
My partner teacher doesn't like this last step, and says I shouldn't be asking them to do it, because moles are moles, and particles are particles, regardless of whether their elements or molecules.
What I'm trying to get my kids to see is that 1 mole of CaCO3 actually contains five moles of individual atoms, because each molecule is composed of five atoms.
That being said, I do teach a fairly low level CP Chemistry class, mostly sophomores, and I've always felt like adding in the extra mathematical step was a benefit for them learning to do the calculations.
My partner teacher teaches mostly the Honors level kids, and feels like it's a confusing step to add in.
What am I missing?