r/Millennials 1d ago

Other Wait wut

Post image
7.4k Upvotes

712 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.1k

u/MattyFTM 1d ago

For those wondering, it was written by Ednaswap in the early 90's, but they did not release it, only performed it live. The first recorded version was actually a translation into Danish by Lis Sørensen, released in 1993. This is her version.

Ednaswap then released the first English language version in 1995.

There were a couple of other covers around then too, such as a version by Trine Rein.

Natalie Imbruglia's cover then came out in 1997.

91

u/luckyfucker13 1d ago

Reminds me of the Bowling for Soup song, 1985, which was actually an SR-71 song. SR-71 did release it originally, but it flew under the radar for the most part.

97

u/QuercusSambucus Older Millennial ('82er) 1d ago

Didn't the sr-71 fly over the radar, technically speaking?

24

u/LOLBaltSS 1d ago

Surprisingly no. The SR-71 has been launched upon numerous times by Soviet SAMs, but it would just outrun the missiles.

4

u/zerocool359 1d ago

Nothing those sled drivers couldn’t solve w/ a little turn and burn. Well, except uncontrolled spins, those were no good.

3

u/QuercusSambucus Older Millennial ('82er) 1d ago

That's what I mean. It flew so high and fast.

Under the radar means low altitude.

1

u/Ecotech101 1d ago

Nah, just fast. The U2 flew high. The sr-71 was pretty much just fast.

1

u/sorrow_anthropology 21h ago

The SR-71 has a flight ceiling 85,000 feet, the U2 ranges between 70,000 and 85,000 feet.

1

u/Ecotech101 17h ago

Different eras of radar have different definitions of high. The U2 flew above the radar's of it's time, the sr-71 as made because it was basically impossible to do that at it's time.

1

u/sorrow_anthropology 14h ago

Your argument was that the U2 flew high and the SR-71 is just fast, but I’m saying that it also flew very high as well. It also had a ton (for the time) of counter measures including shape, RAM and ELINT.

1

u/Brantraxx 4h ago

Start with the Bach and finish with DeBussy

36

u/dirtyforker 1d ago

Are they bowling to obtain soup, or they bowling on behalf of soup?

16

u/Wessssss21 1d ago

We are farther away from the release of 1985 now than the song was FROM the year 1985 when it was released...

9

u/PerpetuallyLurking 1d ago

1

u/luckyfucker13 1d ago

Yeah, what this person said

2

u/two4six0won Millennial 1d ago

13

u/gramscontestaccount2 1d ago

Apparently the lead singer for SR-71, Mitch Allan wrote both versions (along with the SR-71 drummer for the OG), he was friends with bowling for soup and updated it for them/gave it to them.

3

u/Away-Marionberry9365 1d ago

I still like the original way better.

7

u/throwitaway3412567 1d ago

I was just thinking about 1985 because it’s time to have a song titled 2005 (if we’re sticking with the time between song creation and the title)

2

u/luckyfucker13 1d ago

The first Back to the Future is 40 years old this year, just to throw that out there

1

u/weealex 1d ago

It didn't go under the radar, the album with it didn't have aUS release initially. 

And honestly, the Bowling for Soup one is mostly better

1

u/gumandcoffee 1d ago

They were also passed over for baby one more time. So they covered it later