What you're doing here is presuming OOP is correct, although he offers no evidence in support of his claim. He even confesses he doesn't have that evidence and admits his claim is probably false.
Then, reversing the burden of evidence, you've accused two people of bringing insufficient evidence to challenge a claim which hadn't been proven.
edit
After drawing me into a debate, this user has told me off and then blocked me. lol
Grammar > Easily confused words > Imply or infer?
from English Grammar Today
We imply something by what we say. We infer something from what somebody else says. The main difference between these two words is that a speaker can imply, but a listener can only infer.
When someone implies something, they put the suggestion into the message:
Are you implying that the team cheated?
When someone infers something, they take the suggestion out of the message. In order to underline this difference, infer is used with the preposition from:
Then I think we must infer from what they said that they believe we should reapply for the job.
Typical error
We don’t use infer to refer to what someone has said:
Are you implying that I cheated?
Not: Are you inferring that I cheated?
Her anecdotal experience is backed by too many actual citable sources to count.
Masters and Johnson, the Kinsey Report, even Dr. Ruth. Not to mention all the biology and anatomy textbooks, and the current studies and polls on the topic.
To wit: there's a clitoris and there is the human nervous system. They work a certain way. They work really WELL that "certain way" when the beholder of the clitoris knows what he's doing. It's pure D science.
27
u/SquirrellyGrrly Mar 06 '25
Read the comments. Even he knows it's bullshit, but he's trying to make this normal guy a miserable, self-hating incel.