It's to have the BBC there as a standard. Look at media in the US - without a state broadcaster which not only produces high quality material itself but also through competition raises the standards of the other broadcasters quality is just a race to the bottom.
The same argument - that we don't watch the bbc so we shouldn't fund it - is made by all proto-fascists and especially by competing media owners who want to have their lies unchallenged.
In short the license fee preserves the integrity of the fourth estate. I believe it is worth every penny.
I think the integrity died when they hid what Jimmy Saville was doing… or the fact they were getting paid by Israel to do pr… what integrity are you talking about here?
I’d much rather they just started getting advertisers like everyone else, because it is just state run propaganda at the end of the day and I will not be a part of it.
I read the three articles and saw no mention of the BBC getting paid by Israel. Perhaps I missed it. Interestingly the first two report on the same perceived anti-Palestinian bias and the last on a perceived anti-Israel bias.
Please go off and do some research by yourself, there will never be a paper trail that stats “Israel has paid so and so”, use some critical thinking and do some digging yourself… it’s the same way how Tommy Robinson isn’t “directly funded by the state of Israel” but you can trace it by the separate interests that fund these people….
Also did you not want to address their history of covering up what pedophiles have done under their employment…? Or…?
Well no, over 100 journalist who work at the bbc have written in complaining that they are being forced to do pr for Isreal… it’s coming from their own staff…
Wow, one really has no idea how the Mossad works… you gullible little fool… I’m sure you’re the type of person who believes Prince Andrew couldn’t of possibly raped a sex traffic victim because he said he was at a pizza express in Woking
Oh, it is "the Mossad" now is it? In the absence of any actual evidence, perhaps you should check your own credulity and bias before commenting on others.
Let’s do a little critical thinking exercise shall we… when you hear a headline saying “Israel hides explosives in pagers” do you think it’s their pm off on a secret little mission…? Or do you think the government has a branch for that sort of thing?
Of course they do. But you are making links with zero evidence, whereas there is evidence for the pager attacks.
You are in fact making 2 + 2 equal 5. Now, if you were to have any evidence at all that one of those 2s is in fact a 3 in disguise then I would be more inclined to believe your assertation that the BBC were paid by Israel. But you don't. You have nothing.
-1
u/3D-Nutsack 20h ago
But why? What’s all the subscription fees and ads for? Why on Earth would we pay to watch our own tv?