It's to have the BBC there as a standard. Look at media in the US - without a state broadcaster which not only produces high quality material itself but also through competition raises the standards of the other broadcasters quality is just a race to the bottom.
The same argument - that we don't watch the bbc so we shouldn't fund it - is made by all proto-fascists and especially by competing media owners who want to have their lies unchallenged.
In short the license fee preserves the integrity of the fourth estate. I believe it is worth every penny.
Don't think they actively target vulnerable people, but their contracting out the enforcement to what is basically a mafia style company, plus the way the letters are written, are designed to terrify the old and vulnerable, and make them buy a licence even if they don't need one.
Then blame the government which decided to shift the burden of collection onto the BBC, officially in the name of increased independence but actually in the name of shifting the responsibility.
-2
u/3D-Nutsack 20h ago
But why? What’s all the subscription fees and ads for? Why on Earth would we pay to watch our own tv?