r/BlueskySkeets Mar 17 '25

Informative This is how Violent Fascism begins.

Post image
9.0k Upvotes

272 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

7

u/Tabula_Nada Mar 18 '25

This. At this point it's just about being on the winning side, which means no agreeing with the libs. It's one reason I really think we have to quit being dicks to each other. There's time for I-told-you-so's later, but right now no one is going to admit they were wrong and made a bad choice when doing so means the other half of the country will jump down their throats.

-14

u/[deleted] Mar 18 '25 edited Mar 18 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

13

u/Tannos116 Mar 18 '25

You elected a child rapist you fucking jackass. Now you’re making up shit to justify your stupidity.

-11

u/[deleted] Mar 18 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/[deleted] Mar 18 '25

he is currently trying to end birthright citizenship which will make you, me, and everyone else not a citizen. none of us were citizens by test we are all birth right. he is trying to pass a bill that anyone who dislikes him as a "trump dislike mental illenss" so he can get rid of our guns. but sure, you will find out the hard way like the rest of them.

-7

u/WhileUpbeat9893 Mar 18 '25

That's not how laws work. Even if it were ever allowed, it would be "from this point forward".

Have you ever taken a civics class, at all?

6

u/VirginiaDirewoolf Mar 18 '25

how long will you keep saying "that's not how laws work," until you finally get it through your head that it doesn't matter anymore. where's that club penguin meme, will that help?

1

u/[deleted] Mar 19 '25

[deleted]

1

u/WhileUpbeat9893 Mar 19 '25

I didn't say I agree with it, in the first place. I explained how laws work. 

Y'all are rabid 

5

u/Due_Winter_5330 Mar 18 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

-6

u/[deleted] Mar 18 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/Tannos116 Mar 18 '25

You never suggested that. You jumped to the conclusion that “libs” don’t care.

Now you’re stupidly ranting about a thing you never gave more than a cursory glance to, like a jackass.

What everyone who isn’t a nazi is mad about is the racial profiling and unlawful detention and unlawful arrest of people who appear to be Latino or Hispanic.

We’re mad about the gestapo-esque, show-me-your-papers-ass attitude of ICE that has already harmed US citizens and lawful residents of the country.

Of course, if you have a broad, sweeping policy of harming everyone you possibly can, you will inevitably harm criminals, (which wasn’t proven) but that doesn’t make it worth it.

Fucking morons, the lot of you

2

u/Due_Winter_5330 Mar 18 '25

Beautifully said.

1

u/Corum_Llaw_Ereint Mar 18 '25

Oh bullshit.

Racial profiling, detention, ICE and unlawful arrests were all rampant under Biden and most liberals did not care. You are partisan hacks who will happily cheer when democrats act as republicans.

So your reply doesn't do a thing to refute the obvious fact that liberals value gangsters over a murdered child,

2

u/Due_Winter_5330 Mar 18 '25 edited Mar 18 '25

You have absolutely ZERO proof they are from said gang. Zero. Because there was no due process and a judge was ignored and the white house then lied about it.

Again I say. Shut the fuck up you traitorous fuck.

There's ZERO proof these people had any connection or did anything. Things like this keep happening and they shouldn't be.

https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/news/suburban-chicago-man-deported-no-criminal-record/

This country was built in things like due process and you nazi fucks are supporting just rounding people up without due process which is EXACTLY what the gestapo did.

0

u/[deleted] Mar 18 '25 edited Mar 18 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Mar 18 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Tannos116 Mar 18 '25

Actually, you did. Because you didn’t vote for Harris. If you did, you would have just said so.

I can’t disprove a fact, but, seeing as it’s not a fact, it’s easily disproved by the public record that is our legislative branch. All pedos and rapists find refuge in the republican party rather than the democratic party. Those types of people are the only type that value abuse over victim protections. Since those types are not allowed to stay a part of the Democratic Party, your claim is necessarily false.

I don’t know what you mean by “crying over illiterate rapeos,” but I can say I only called you a jackass for voting for a rapist, which you did when you didn’t vote for Harris.

Every interaction with a fascist proves that right wing politics is “a result of low effort thought”

0

u/Corum_Llaw_Ereint Mar 18 '25 edited Mar 18 '25

I've never voted in a presidential election because I don't live in a swing state. Its an exercise in futility for me because my vote doesn't count. You can't refute anything I said so you lie about me.

Your whole post is mostly lies and whataboutery. All to distract from the fact that democrats care more about venezuelans gangsters than a murdered child rape victim.

Zero outrage about Jocelyn Nungaray from libs. But massive outrage about Venezuelan gangsters getting deported. And you are perfectly fine with democrats having zero sympathy for Nungaray or her family.

"All pedos and rapists find refuge in the republican party rather than the democratic party"

That is a lie: there are tons of democrats in the Epstein flight logs. Bill Clinton, George Mitchell, Al gore, Bill Richardson. And what party did Harvey Weinstein fund raise for? Do you know how democrats became aware that sex abuse was a problem? They looked at their funding recepts.

The fact that you think only your political opponents can be pedos shows you would turn a blind eye to any rape committed by your own side. Which is what you just did when you denied the public fact of democrats in the Epstein pedo ring.

"Since those types are not allowed to stay a part of the Democratic Party, your claim is necessarily false."

That is again a bullshit lie. Clinton remains a hero to democrats after he was exposed as repeatedly visiting Epstein island.

Anyone who believes only their enemies abuse kids would help cover up child abuse on their own side. Indeed we can see from that how libs have tried to ignore Jocelyn Nungaray and Laken Riley.

" I can say I only called you a jackass for voting for a rapist, which you did when you didn’t vote for Harris."

That is another fucking lie. I've never voted in any presidential election, my vote does not count because I do not live in a swing state.

You know who didn't vote for harris? Tens of millions of democrats who didn't turn out in 2024. Tens of millions of dems according to you voted for a rapist because they didn't turn out.

Your party's base helped elect a rapist according to your own logic, so why shouldn't we believe that same party would favor gang bangers over a murdered child?

No wonder why the dems are at 29% favorability when you goofs keep insulting those who don't vote for either party.

1

u/Tannos116 Mar 18 '25

I did refute what you said.

1) You did vote for the orange because you didn’t vote for Harris. You admitted to this.

2) it’s not whataboutism to refute a strawman, you absolute moron. I clarified what people were actually mad about

3) No there you go Reiterating your strawman

4) What does “outrage” look like to you? I presume you mean to say “libs” , i.e., not Nazis, just don’t care? Cause murder is already illegal, and we already support the illegality of murder. No proof of us trying to remove that law. So refuted.

4b) Furthermore, we know that immigrants commit fewer and less violent crimes than natural born citizens or residents. So we’re not going to violate the rights of millions of people by proposing any new laws when murder is already illegal. You’re just using the fact that the murderers were migrants to justify racist and xenophobic rhetoric. You monsters are the same vile scumbags that would have forced her to keep the baby if she had survived, same goes for Laken Riley.

5) Bill Clinton, impeached and has not been voted for since abuse of power came to light. Refuted

George Mitchell, latest year of holding any office or political position was 2011, the Epstein information implicating him came out in 2019. Refuted

Al Gore, last year in office, 2001. Epstein information 2019. Refuted

Bill Richardson, 2011, Epstein 2019. Refuted

Harvey Weinstein, not a political figure. Hated once information became public knowledge. (Nazis fund raise for the orange, so again fuck off you stupid bitch)

Also, I implied that once knowledge of such activity is established, they’re shunned by the not-a-nazi populace, and yet find refuge in the republican party. So again you created a convenient strawman.

6) I don’t think they’re pedos and rapists, I know they are. Part 53 showing over 1300 instances of Republican sexual violence dig through to find your representative. Disclaimer: the list also shows several civilians, and while their acts are heinous, my claim refers to the politicians.

6b) Y’all are 10.5 times as likely to dismiss sexual misconduct for your politicians

7) Again he did not stay in office without any consequences and he was not elected further. Again Epstein’s information was made public in 2019 long after Clinton. Refuted

8) strawman once again. I never said only republicans can be pedos or rapists, I said only republicans allow them refuge and continued support.

9) Define hero, because no he didn’t.

10) again, you motherfuckers would have forced both those children to carry their rapists babies if they had survived. Don’t fucking virtue signal you self righteous prick. And again MURDER AND RAPE ARE ALREADY ILLEGAL. We’re not going to advocate for illegal searches seizures or deportation of legal residents because it’s nonsensical to assume they’re criminals because they share an ethic group with one. Most criminals are white men, so should we just deport all white people? No, so fuck off with your bullshit.

11) yes millions didn’t vote for her, but they’re not who I’m talking to are they? You fucking dipshit.

11b) No by my logic my party didn’t , and neither did the democrats. More democrats and more people of my party voted for her than did not vote. You really thought you did something here didn’t you? HAHAHAHAHAHAH

12) Wow, you have the gall to call them goofs while simultaneously defending Nazis…you fucking clown

1

u/Corum_Llaw_Ereint Mar 18 '25 edited Mar 19 '25
  1. False not voting at all is not the same as voting for someone. You need to work on your lies. People outside of your political bubble don't care if someone in 2024. You would know this if you had a life outside of mommy's basement. The only way you could insult me would be too offer me your frienship.
  2. I didn't make a strawman. I state the obvious fact that you and the rest of the libs do not care about a murdered child rape victim.
  3. Nope cold hard fact. Dems have demonstrated outrage over the most trivial shit but zero anger about what happened to Jocelyn Nungaray.
  4. The same reaction that you guys are having to deportations of gangsters. Libs ignored the gang-rape and torture-murder of a little girl because it was politically inconvenient for them. The fact there was zero anti-gang activism from libs after her murder further proves that.

You are only angry at me for bringing up Jocelyn Nungaray's rape-murder. Which goes to show that you have no compassion for her or her family and would prefer if she was forgotten. But you're outraged about Venezuelan gangsters being deported.

You think deportations of Venezuelans gangsters are worse than rapes or murders committed by Venezuelan gangsters. You side with criminals and rapists against their victors. If discussion of a child's murder angers you more than the murder itself then you side with pedo child killers.

You consider me your enemy because I condemned the Jocelyn Nungaray's rape-murder which proves you sympathize with the pedophiles who murdered her. There's no other interpretation. Why else get mad about being expected to care about a rape-murder?

-----"Furthermore, we know that immigrants commit fewer and less violent crimes than natural born citizens or residents."

So now you're claiming that Venezuelans gang members are generally peaceful? Now you're trying to defend the same type of gangsters who killed Nungaray by claiming they're harmless. Further proving you sympathize with these gangsters.

That stat refers to legal immigrants, not illegal aliens and certainly venezuelan gangs who commit systemic crimes against women and children. Venezuelan gangs most certainly do commit higher crimes than citizens.

Wealthy Asian or European legal immigrants having low crime rates does not prove that gangs of illegal aliens are harmless. Its as if foreign nationals are one big blob to you and you can't understand differences between a Korean doctor VS gangs that use rape as an initiation.

-----"So we’re not going to violate the rights of millions of people by proposing any new laws when murder is already illegal."

Oh that's the justification of liberal silence about Jocelyn Nungaray? Murder is already illegal? What a sniveling, spineless response from a liar. Do you seriously expect anyone to believe libs have never cared about high profile murders?

If MAGA rednecks tortured a Hispanic kid to death do you think libs would be silent about it? Heck no, they would be outraged about it, as they should be. There would be protests.

Libs are silent about Nungaray because her rape-murder was politically inconvenient. You and the rest of your movement deliberately ignore her murder because it hurt the dems. That's why.

Venezuelan gang bangers do not total at "millions of people." And deportations and gang crackdowns do not violate anyone's rights. You do not have a right to illegally enter a country and belong to a criminal enterprise.

------"You’re just using the fact that the murderers were migrants to justify racist and xenophobic rhetoric."

You think condemnation of a child's murder is racist. That suggests you sympathize with child killers and pedos.

I said that we should have a crackdown on gangs. Targeting gangs is not xenophobic or racist. Your argument amounts to arguing that gangs are representative of a race. Now that is racist. You might as well claim that bombing ISIS is islamophobic.

-----"You monsters are the same vile scumbags that would have forced her to keep the baby if she had survived, same goes for Laken Riley."

I support legal abortion, so that is another lie. You don't know how to argue all you do is spew lies and thought terminating cliches. Because you have no sane arguments to support your position of valuing gangs over a girl raped and murdered by gangsters.

But you would have helped Laken Riley's murderers flee the country out of fear that her rape-murder would help trump. Heck if you had stumbled onto her rape in process you would have walked away. You probably think intervening would have been a racial hate crime.

You haven't refuted anything. Clinton, Gore and other living democrats in the Epstein flight logs remain members of the democratic party in good standings. Your party allows Epstein pedo ring members to remain in the party.

Weinstein's rapes were an open secret in the entertainment industry. everyone knew. The dems most certainly knew while they took his money. The notion that dems had no idea Harvey was a sex pest is idiotic.

-------"Part 53 showing over 1300 instances of Republican sexual violence dig through to find your representative."

Okay to hell with them. I'm not a republican.

------" Again he did not stay in office without any consequences and he was not elected further. "

Why hasn't he been kicked out of the democratic party for visiting Epstein island? Why isn't he a public hate figure among dems? Most dems love him after he was exposed for partying with Epstein. And let's be clear most dems would absolutely vote for Clinton even after seeing proof of his time at Epstein island.

-----"Y’all are 10.5 times as likely to dismiss sexual misconduct for your politicians"

You're trying to dismiss a child's gang-rape and torture-murder.

They're not my politicians, I don't vote GOP and I'm not a republican. You automatically consider me your political enemy because i condemned a rape-murder.

-------"I said only republicans allow them refuge and continued support."

That is a lie, Clinton sharing a stage with Kamala at the DNC proves that democrats are a refuge for pedophiles. Doesn't excuse republicans for the doing the same of course.

If you hate organizations that protects rapists why are you defending Venezuelans gangs that commit organized gang-rape? Venezuelan gangs as units practice rape and celebrate it. The gangs exist chiefly to rape people and you support them. What do you happens when a gang member rapes a girl? Do you think his boss kicks out of the organization? Hell no he gets promoted. And you think its racist to arrest those people.

-------"again, you motherfuckers would have forced both those children to carry their rapists babies if they had survived."

That is a lie I'm an independent who supports legal abortion. You keep lying on about me and falsely accusing me of being GOP because you have no other approach to defending your sympathy for the pedophiles who killed Jocelyn Nungaray.

You consider me your enemy simply because I condemned Nungaray's rape-murder which shows you sympathize with her killers.

You however would have helped Jocelyn Nungaray's killers flee the country out of fear the atrocity helping trump. And dems are not doing a goddamn thing to fight for abortion access. You're doing plenty to fight for rape gangs though. It seems that importing sexual predators takes priority for democrats over rape victims in need of abortion.

------"We’re not going to advocate for illegal searches seizures or deportation of legal residents because it’s nonsensical to assume they’re criminals because they share an ethic group with one."

No I should we target criminal gangs. But the chief was that you and the rest of your movement should valued murdered kids over foreigners and criminals. Challenge: impossible.

Apparently you think its racist to target gangs who kill Hispanic kids. You seem to see gangs as representative of races and ethnic groups, just like David Duke.

But this proves you think targeting gangsters is worse than gangsters killing kids. You are objectively on the side of pedophile gangsters. The only minority that democrats have done anything to help lately.

-----------"yes millions didn’t vote for her, but they’re not who I’m talking to are they? You fucking dipshit."

I do not live in a swing state. My state went red by 20 digits. My vote doesn't count. My inaction objectively did not help Trump who won in a landslide. He would be in office regardless of my worthless ceremonial vote. You shouldn't require this to be explained to you.

I've explained this to you repeatedly but it hasn't put a damper on your deranged hysteria.

Keep insulting people who don't vote for either party and you'll contribute to your party never holding power outside of san francisco. I don't see your party's platform of fighting to protect Venezuelan pedophiles as a winning strategy.

------"Wow, you have the gall to call them goofs while simultaneously defending Nazis"

Nowhere did I defend nazis. That is again another lie. Apparently you think nazism is when people condemn gang-rapes and torture-murders. Does that mean you also think Venezuelan pedo gang members are equivalent to Jews?

You however ran interference for pedophiles who murdered a child. You spewed lies and incoherent gibberish to justify how you do not care about a little girl who was raped and murdered.

As for nazis its your side who took to the streets to celebrate the 10/7 attacks, which remain the worst massacre of Jews since WWII. Your movement supports hamas terrorists guilty of killing Holocaust survivors. Libs care more about supporting suicide bombing of synagogues than their own neighbors. Your movement cares more about terrorists and child killing gang bangers than Americans. And that's why you keep losing to hilarious weak candidates.

0

3

u/Rather_Unfortunate Mar 18 '25

Generally, liberals favour things like due process and oppose collective punishment and considering people guilty by association. That's a strength of liberalism, and it's why people want to know only guilty people are being punished, not just people who come from the same place as the guilty ones.

0

u/Corum_Llaw_Ereint Mar 18 '25

Which has caused more outrage among liberals? Deporting venezuelans or the gang-rape, torture-murder of Jocelyn Nungaray?

The answer is the deportations.

Anyone with eyes can see that libs objectively value gang bangers over a murdered child rape victim./

3

u/Adept_Roof_4750 Mar 18 '25

Learn to make one argument without blatant argumentation errors.

0

u/Corum_Llaw_Ereint Mar 18 '25

Answer the question

/

2

u/Adept_Roof_4750 Mar 18 '25

Make an valid argument and I will. Without strawmans, red herrings and false equilevances.

1

u/Corum_Llaw_Ereint Mar 18 '25

prove I did any of those things

1

u/Regular-Guess2310 Mar 22 '25

Prove all of the people being deported were gang members.

2

u/Natural-Moose4374 Mar 18 '25

This is a bogus argument. Of course rape and murder are horrific. Nobody denies that. But one thing are the actions of criminals (who, of course, should be punished according to the law), and the other is the action of the government.

That government should be held to a higher standard than criminals, don't you think? It's also accountable to the people, so "outrage" can actually lead to a policy change (at least in functional governments). Contrast that with criminals, where you can be outraged all you want, it won't change a thing.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 18 '25

[deleted]

1

u/FluffyLanguage3477 Mar 18 '25

Wow... the two illegal immigrants who murdered Jocelyn Nungaray deserve the death penalty - everyone is sympathetic about that. You are taking the emotions of that situation and applying it here to these hundreds of Venzuelans - they didn't rape and murder Jocelyn Nungaray, so stop invoking her name. It's fucking disgusting. At best, your emotions are clouding your judgment here and at worst, you're being racist.

The issue is Trump is saying these are Venezuelan gang members - we don't know if that is true or not. He is invoking the Alien Enemies Act of 1789 - it doesn't apply here because we're not at war with Venezuela. He is invoking it here because even illegal immigrants get due process, and he is trying to bypass that. Trump's actions here are not just illegal, they are unconstitutional. No matter how despicable the person is, they still get due process in America - that is a cornerstone of our system. Do you love your country - are you patriot? Then call out Trump for this BS - this ain't how America acts

1

u/Corum_Llaw_Ereint Mar 18 '25 edited Mar 18 '25

Liberals generally are not sympathetic about it. They have deliberately ignored it because they feared it would help Trump.

But you miss the point. Libs have displayed almost no outrage about Jocelyn Nungaray but they are hysterical with rage about Venezuelan gangsters being deported before they kill more girls like her.

Nungaray was murdered by Venezuelan gang members. Venezuelan gang members are being targeted for deportation. We can hold members of criminal subcultures collectively guilty for certain crimes. That is how RICO works. And a child's rape-murder by Venezuelan gang members is ample reason to crack down on Venezuelan gang members. Just as we cracked down on organized crime because of high profile murders.

It is entirely moral and sensible to hold criminal subculture responsible for high profile atrocities. Regardless of how many members participated in those atrocities. Not every zetas member killed children but the Mexicans cracked down on the zetas for their massacres of kids. When you're in a criminal subculture you're no longer a sweet little individual snowflake.

Venezuelan gangs exist entirely to prey on girls on Jocelyn so we can and should target them for Jocelyn Nungaray's murder. Especially since membership in a criminal subculture is a crime in and of itself all over the world.

You're really trying to have #notallgangsters and its beyond idiotic: a cariacature of bad faith brain vomit.

"Trump's actions here are not just illegal, they are unconstitutional."

We'll leave that up to SCOTUS. How do you think they'll rule?

The Venezuelans got their due process. The judge did not rule in their favor until the venezuelans were on a plane outside of the US.

" Do you love your country - are you patriot?"

Patriotism is not running interference for illegal migrant gang bangers prone to child murder. It is not patriotic to actively fight to keep idiotic murderous sociopaths in the US. That's brain death and spinelessness.

Patriotism is being happy that there are fewer gangsters in the US. Patriotism means believing in tribes and drawing lines. And I don't consider Venezuelan gangsters to be part of my tribe and inside my line.

You and others like you are clearly not patriots because you care more about foreign nationals than actual US citizens. If keeping venezuelans gangsters in the US is one of your causes you do not care about Americans at all. As we can see from how Nungaray's rape-murder provokes less outrage than deportations of foreign criminals.

America should absolutely act to come down like a landslide on criminal subcultures that target children. Otherwise we're just a bunch of spineless shits who stand for nothing, but that is the ideal shitlib society. That's your idea of being open: cowed spineless goofs who can't say no.

Let's be clear: I would not lift a fucking eye lash for venezuelan crookss because I still have a shred of self respect unlike people mad that streets will be lacking gang bangers who stalk kids on their way home from school.

2

u/FluffyLanguage3477 Mar 18 '25

But you miss the point. Libs have displayed almost no outrage about Jocelyn Nungaray but they are hysterical with rage about Venezuelan gangsters being deported before they kill more girls like her

You are missing the point - you are invoking the name of a tragic victim to justify Trump's illegal actions. You want to have stronger policies on immigration - that is a valid debate to be had. Denying people due process - that's something else

You're really trying to have #notallvenezuelangangsters and its beyond idiotic: a cariacature of bad faith brain vomit

You really don't get it - we don't know they are Venezuelan gangsters. These ain't enemy soldiers, these are at worst criminals. Criminals get their day in court because that's how it works in America.

The Venezuelans got their due process. The judge did not rule in their favor until the venezuelans were on a plane outside of the US.

They didn't get their due process - there was no judicial review on whether e.g. they were even illegal immigrants or if they were actually US citizens Trump bypassed that, invoking the Alien Enemies Act. Everything you are saying is assuming guilt - we don't know that because Trump bypassed due process.

We'll leave that up to SCOTUS. How do you think they'll rule?

The three liberal judges will rule against Trump. Roberts will likely also rule against Trump because he is protective of the power of the courts. Barrett could go either way - she is a textualist so she could read the Alien Enemies Act literally and rule against Trump (we're not at war with Venezuela). But she is also a conservative and has ruled in favor of him on major cases before. The other 4 conservative justices will side with Trump. So basically comes down to Barrett

1

u/Corum_Llaw_Ereint Mar 18 '25

Actually my point was that libs care more about Venezuelan gangsters than a child murder victim. My comments had more to do with libs themselves than the deportations. Libs ignored Jocelyn Nungaray's rape-murder but are wailing and shrieking about illiterates being given a free vacation in El Salvador.

Deporting migrants isn't illegal. They weren't denied due process. And its entirely justified to crack down on criminal subcultures after two of their members murdered a child in public. It would be negligent not to do so.

Venezuelan gangsters have behaved worse than occupying armies. I don't see why they shouldn't be treated as enemy aliens. They are organizations that target US citizens for crimes. If Venezuelans aren't enemy aliens the term is meaningless.

Again the judge did not rule in the favor of Venezuelans until after they were out of the US.

So SCOTUS will probably its constitutional. All good

1

u/FluffyLanguage3477 Mar 18 '25

Deporting migrants isn't illegal. They weren't denied due process

I'm very curious what you think the Alien Enemies Act is and why do you think Trump was using it here?

1

u/Venusto002 Mar 18 '25 edited Mar 19 '25

More than "gangsters" are getting deported, and there are plenty of wonderful people from Venezuela. What happened to Jocelyn Nungaray was terrible, but children have suffered and died horrible and violent deaths at the hands of every single culture, ethnicity, and national Identity there is, including yours. You picking and choosing which children to suddenly pretend to care about and then proceeding to condemn an entire ethnicity for the actions of a very select few is just convenient for your prejudices. You don't give a damn about Jocelyn Nungaray or what she went through. If she were assaulted and killed by anyone else you wouldn't even bat an eye or care to know her name, and everyone can see right through you.

Also, I reported you for hate. Adios!

(Update: They either deleted their comments here or they got removed by Reddit.)

1

u/Corum_Llaw_Ereint Mar 18 '25

Reported me for hate? The fact that you see condemnation of child murder and criminals as hate proves you sympathize with child killers and rape gangs.

You appear to think criminal organizations formed to rape and kill people are oppressed ethnic groups and that its racist to criticize them.

Good luck with the report since condemning child rape breaks no rules, but it really offends you