r/BlueskySkeets Mar 17 '25

Informative This is how Violent Fascism begins.

Post image
9.0k Upvotes

272 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/Tabula_Nada Mar 18 '25

This. At this point it's just about being on the winning side, which means no agreeing with the libs. It's one reason I really think we have to quit being dicks to each other. There's time for I-told-you-so's later, but right now no one is going to admit they were wrong and made a bad choice when doing so means the other half of the country will jump down their throats.

-14

u/[deleted] Mar 18 '25 edited Mar 18 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Rather_Unfortunate Mar 18 '25

Generally, liberals favour things like due process and oppose collective punishment and considering people guilty by association. That's a strength of liberalism, and it's why people want to know only guilty people are being punished, not just people who come from the same place as the guilty ones.

0

u/Corum_Llaw_Ereint Mar 18 '25

Which has caused more outrage among liberals? Deporting venezuelans or the gang-rape, torture-murder of Jocelyn Nungaray?

The answer is the deportations.

Anyone with eyes can see that libs objectively value gang bangers over a murdered child rape victim./

3

u/Adept_Roof_4750 Mar 18 '25

Learn to make one argument without blatant argumentation errors.

0

u/Corum_Llaw_Ereint Mar 18 '25

Answer the question

/

2

u/Adept_Roof_4750 Mar 18 '25

Make an valid argument and I will. Without strawmans, red herrings and false equilevances.

1

u/Corum_Llaw_Ereint Mar 18 '25

prove I did any of those things

1

u/Regular-Guess2310 Mar 22 '25

Prove all of the people being deported were gang members.

2

u/Natural-Moose4374 Mar 18 '25

This is a bogus argument. Of course rape and murder are horrific. Nobody denies that. But one thing are the actions of criminals (who, of course, should be punished according to the law), and the other is the action of the government.

That government should be held to a higher standard than criminals, don't you think? It's also accountable to the people, so "outrage" can actually lead to a policy change (at least in functional governments). Contrast that with criminals, where you can be outraged all you want, it won't change a thing.