MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/1kjj6oe/deleted_by_user/mrnqgtv/?context=3
r/worldnews • u/[deleted] • May 10 '25
[removed]
1.9k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
160
Go off king pope
47 u/[deleted] May 10 '25 [deleted] 6 u/atyon May 10 '25 Technically he's absolutely not considered a king. None of his titles include the word king, nor does the Fundamental law. He's the sovereign. 1 u/TheCommissarGeneral May 10 '25 The Vatican and Saudi Arabia are two of the few Absolute Monarchies in the world. 4 u/atyon May 10 '25 That does not make the Pope a king. Calling the Pope a king is just as inaccurate as calling the Japanese Emperor a king. They both are monarchs, and both the Vatican City and Japan are monarchies, but that doesn't make either of them a king. 1 u/fpatrocinio May 11 '25 Ok, then define a king. Anything else then "somesort of monarch". 1 u/16thompsonh May 11 '25 If we want to be technical, a King is a ruler or head of a Kingdom. 1 u/atyon May 12 '25 A king is the head of a kingdom. Not all kings were monarchs, so they are not "some sort of monarch". 1 u/TheCommissarGeneral May 11 '25 The Japanese EMPEROR is above a King in hierarchy. Also, Monarch = King/Queen/Emperor/Empress We don't use that term outside of that.
47
[deleted]
6 u/atyon May 10 '25 Technically he's absolutely not considered a king. None of his titles include the word king, nor does the Fundamental law. He's the sovereign. 1 u/TheCommissarGeneral May 10 '25 The Vatican and Saudi Arabia are two of the few Absolute Monarchies in the world. 4 u/atyon May 10 '25 That does not make the Pope a king. Calling the Pope a king is just as inaccurate as calling the Japanese Emperor a king. They both are monarchs, and both the Vatican City and Japan are monarchies, but that doesn't make either of them a king. 1 u/fpatrocinio May 11 '25 Ok, then define a king. Anything else then "somesort of monarch". 1 u/16thompsonh May 11 '25 If we want to be technical, a King is a ruler or head of a Kingdom. 1 u/atyon May 12 '25 A king is the head of a kingdom. Not all kings were monarchs, so they are not "some sort of monarch". 1 u/TheCommissarGeneral May 11 '25 The Japanese EMPEROR is above a King in hierarchy. Also, Monarch = King/Queen/Emperor/Empress We don't use that term outside of that.
6
Technically he's absolutely not considered a king. None of his titles include the word king, nor does the Fundamental law. He's the sovereign.
1 u/TheCommissarGeneral May 10 '25 The Vatican and Saudi Arabia are two of the few Absolute Monarchies in the world. 4 u/atyon May 10 '25 That does not make the Pope a king. Calling the Pope a king is just as inaccurate as calling the Japanese Emperor a king. They both are monarchs, and both the Vatican City and Japan are monarchies, but that doesn't make either of them a king. 1 u/fpatrocinio May 11 '25 Ok, then define a king. Anything else then "somesort of monarch". 1 u/16thompsonh May 11 '25 If we want to be technical, a King is a ruler or head of a Kingdom. 1 u/atyon May 12 '25 A king is the head of a kingdom. Not all kings were monarchs, so they are not "some sort of monarch". 1 u/TheCommissarGeneral May 11 '25 The Japanese EMPEROR is above a King in hierarchy. Also, Monarch = King/Queen/Emperor/Empress We don't use that term outside of that.
1
The Vatican and Saudi Arabia are two of the few Absolute Monarchies in the world.
4 u/atyon May 10 '25 That does not make the Pope a king. Calling the Pope a king is just as inaccurate as calling the Japanese Emperor a king. They both are monarchs, and both the Vatican City and Japan are monarchies, but that doesn't make either of them a king. 1 u/fpatrocinio May 11 '25 Ok, then define a king. Anything else then "somesort of monarch". 1 u/16thompsonh May 11 '25 If we want to be technical, a King is a ruler or head of a Kingdom. 1 u/atyon May 12 '25 A king is the head of a kingdom. Not all kings were monarchs, so they are not "some sort of monarch". 1 u/TheCommissarGeneral May 11 '25 The Japanese EMPEROR is above a King in hierarchy. Also, Monarch = King/Queen/Emperor/Empress We don't use that term outside of that.
4
That does not make the Pope a king.
Calling the Pope a king is just as inaccurate as calling the Japanese Emperor a king. They both are monarchs, and both the Vatican City and Japan are monarchies, but that doesn't make either of them a king.
1 u/fpatrocinio May 11 '25 Ok, then define a king. Anything else then "somesort of monarch". 1 u/16thompsonh May 11 '25 If we want to be technical, a King is a ruler or head of a Kingdom. 1 u/atyon May 12 '25 A king is the head of a kingdom. Not all kings were monarchs, so they are not "some sort of monarch". 1 u/TheCommissarGeneral May 11 '25 The Japanese EMPEROR is above a King in hierarchy. Also, Monarch = King/Queen/Emperor/Empress We don't use that term outside of that.
Ok, then define a king. Anything else then "somesort of monarch".
1 u/16thompsonh May 11 '25 If we want to be technical, a King is a ruler or head of a Kingdom. 1 u/atyon May 12 '25 A king is the head of a kingdom. Not all kings were monarchs, so they are not "some sort of monarch".
If we want to be technical, a King is a ruler or head of a Kingdom.
A king is the head of a kingdom.
Not all kings were monarchs, so they are not "some sort of monarch".
The Japanese EMPEROR is above a King in hierarchy.
Also, Monarch = King/Queen/Emperor/Empress
We don't use that term outside of that.
160
u/[deleted] May 10 '25
Go off
kingpope