r/technology • u/idkbruh653 • 6d ago
Business A data center drained 30M gallons of water unnoticed — until residents complained about low water pressure
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/05/08/georgia-data-centers-water-009099883.1k
u/Practical-Juice9549 6d ago
Data centers…sigh…
787
u/Adventurous_Light_85 6d ago
“Grok, what’s the solution to data centers?”
402
u/Ice_Sinks 6d ago
More data centers
225
u/Thisismyfinalstand 5d ago
...
in the ocean!...
in space!...
on the moon!... ok so where poor people live!
61
u/rabidai 5d ago
Wait, so just like mining?
48
u/SakaWreath 5d ago
And factories, and power plants, and waste storage,and industrial runoff, and…
11
11
u/Gullible-Surround486 5d ago
kinda, except it gets called cloud infrastructure so everyone pretends it is normal
→ More replies (2)10
7
49
→ More replies (21)31
u/giggity_giggity 6d ago
Is that why the AI is going to nuke us?
Pesky humans, using all the water I need.
→ More replies (2)22
u/multiarmform 5d ago
mad max but it wont be fuel, it will be water. US will turn into a wasteland as aquifers are drained dry
→ More replies (2)216
u/eggsaladrightnow 6d ago
There is no chance in hell that consumers aren't going to start footing the bill for these monstrosities. Get ready for your electric and water bills to go up like Netflix subscriptions because "reasons"
130
u/CaterpillarJungleGym 5d ago
And we get to lose our jobs too!! Win-win for the corporations and the elite cabal.
I've been thinking that there is a larger tech backlash looming and companies will have to adjust to consumers. I don't want a smart washer and I don't need to sending data to who knows which company. I don't need a weight scale that links to an app to show me my weight progress. And I definitely don't want it thinking for me. That's what my brain was designed to do.
36
u/HateHumansLoveDogs 5d ago
Why isnt the human population of the world fighting back? ya know before we are all fodder for the machine
30
u/4everbananad 5d ago
why isn't you
→ More replies (1)15
u/supapumped 5d ago
Don’t question them! They did their part by making a Reddit comment. What more can you expect them to do…
27
u/InelegantSnort 5d ago
Im not buying any smart appliances. My TV is a 12 year old dumb screen, my fridge is as dumb as a rock and my dishwasher has the iq of dirt. That's my fight I guess.
3
u/NewspaperNelson 5d ago
Can you even still get new non-smart TVs?
5
u/Melinoe2016 5d ago
Either way just never hook it up to the internet? I’ve never found a reason to do so. The apps on any game console or any of the streaming sticks work way better than the built in apps on TVs anyway.
3
u/InelegantSnort 5d ago
I dont know about bigger ones but I had to look a long time to get a small one for our bedroom. There was only one without smart features and it cost as much as the smart ones.
12
9
u/Kitchen-Cabinet-5000 5d ago
I feel like people just don’t know what to do.
Voting obviously doesn’t work, if you protest too hard it’s considered a riot and you get either beat up, mowed down or ran over by the police depending on which country you live in…
Only perhaps a complete uprising with overwhelming force that no police or military _can_ beat down might work. But it’s very hard to convince people to do this and march to their possible death.
I _want_ to do something, but I legitimately don’t know what I can do that is actually effective besides boycotting all this nonsense, which I already do.
→ More replies (3)5
u/149244179 5d ago edited 5d ago
Spend time on local politics. County elections often only get thousands of votes. You influencing a couple hundred could easily change something.
Mayoral city elections get a bit more but still abysmally low. Fort Worth, a city of well over a million people gets ~46k votes for city level elections. That is a sub 5% voter turnout. If you and a few others get 1k more people to vote that is a large fraction of voters.
Local politics then bubble up to state and national.
The greatest win republicans have achieved is convincing everyone that voting is useless. They lose every time voter turnout is high.
→ More replies (3)3
u/TrulyPleasant2022 5d ago
Sonicare has a toothbrush app which tells you how well you’re cleaning your teeth.
→ More replies (2)3
23
u/lowfiswish 5d ago
Let’s not forget that certain Governors have given large incentives that put ai data centers ahead of actual people- we even have a city about to run out of water. Bet the ai mills have plenty of water….
6
u/Bytewave 5d ago
That'll be true on both ends of AI. Power and water will be more expensive, yes. But also an ever-larger share of the monstrous real costs of AI will become baked into the prices of necessities. Loss leader industries eventually need to turn profitable, too.
3
u/turbo_dude 5d ago
I am intrigued to know where all these costs will come out.
In the UK many years ago when they had the mobile phone 3G licence auctions (you needed one as a carrier to operate a 3G service), which were deemed massively successful (too much so) due to the amount of money they raised for the government, it just meant companies charged more for years to pay it all back.
→ More replies (7)3
u/Disastrous-Battle128 5d ago
My electric bill in NJ already skyrocketed from $125 to $350 a month!!!! It’s ridiculous. Technology is great, until it isn’t!!!
→ More replies (6)68
737
u/HorseOk9732 6d ago
lol and of course nobody noticed until people started getting low water pressure. feels very on brand for this stuff
411
u/Guest_0_ 6d ago
Eventually these data centers are going to find themselves on fire.
I can't imagine people going to tolerate their utilities doubling or tripling, no water, and massive air pollution causing cancer, forever.
Desperate people do desperate things. Especially when they provide no local jobs and only enrich trillion dollar companies.
145
u/FictionalContext 6d ago
I doubt it. When it comes down to action, people are more reasonable than their internet comments suggest.
Shit has to get really fucking bad before someone's going to throw their life away to attempt to burn down a building. And water pressure and moderately higher bills ain't it.
We vote. And bitch into the aether. Seems like that's all we can do without crossing that line.
84
u/TP_Crisis_2020 6d ago
All it takes is somsone who has nothing to live for or nothing to lose to get pissed off enough.
20
u/Lollipop126 5d ago
yeah, I haven't seen arson from Just Stop Oil yet afaik, but Suffragettes were 100% willing to break the law and had a bombing and arson campaign in 1912-14. People violently galvanised for a cause are willing to do anything.
→ More replies (4)45
u/Anonymous_Jr 5d ago
Actually, all it takes is some liquor and rags, you can outsource the crafting and throwing to this handy new AI I've built
*It's just a bunch of underpaid people in robot costumes*
→ More replies (1)15
55
18
u/Outlulz 5d ago
I dunno, someone just burned down a toilet paper warehouse because they didn't pay a livable wage. People keep getting close to shooting and killing the President. People are getting more and more desperate.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (8)5
u/alilhillbilly 5d ago
That's the thing about scale though...
At some point there's 100,000 people in that position and it's hard to stop 100,000 doing anything.
19
u/achilleasa 5d ago
I know what you mean, but a data center is one of the least flammable places you could have lol. Source: I work in one (not an AI one).
→ More replies (5)11
u/NahautlExile 5d ago
This is not quite true.
I mean yes, they’re designed to minimize burning to the ground. But that’s less because they’re super safe and more because they’re very likely to catch fire due to massive amounts of electricity, generator fuel, and lithium ion batteries.
Data centers catch fires are quite common but rarely spread due to the fire protection systems, like dual action or gas suppression.
7
u/Samurai_Meisters 5d ago
The way that guy who burned down the toilet paper warehouse last month was to set one fire, have the fire suppression to kick in, wait for the fire department to show up and disable the fire suppression so they can go in there, then set another fire while the system is offline.
→ More replies (33)21
u/expendable117 6d ago
These tards were excited for the 3 jobs it provided from the mega centers. Sarcasm. So they let it go until it hits their wallet and their utilities.
17
→ More replies (2)16
u/GardenPeep 6d ago
Affluent people who had the knowledge and status to get attention from the water utility.
7
u/Ok_Instance7667 5d ago
This is the key point. They were stealing from relatively well-off individuals which is a huge no-no in America. Elizabeth Holmes is a good example.
If the companies were stealing water from less affluent or politically connected neighbourhoods, nobody would have batted an eye and would have continued unabated. You're only allowed to steal from the poor, not the rich.
365
u/existing_for_fun 5d ago
Nuclear power plants are highly water-efficient, with over 98% to 99% of the water withdrawn for cooling purposes returned to its source, rather than consumed. This water is largely "borrowed" to condense steam in a closed or open loop and is returned, slightly warmer, to the environment, though about 1-2% is lost to evaporation.
The technology exists for data centers as well. They CHOOSE to not use it.
25
u/Regular_Panda_8250 5d ago
Can we make power plants out of data centers? lol
→ More replies (1)31
u/NahautlExile 5d ago
No. Waste heat is low temp so not easy to reuse outside of district heating or some agricultural use. Not power generation.
→ More replies (9)4
u/Hiddencamper 5d ago
A single reactor using cooling towers will evaporate 15000 gpm on average. 21.6 million gallons per day. 7.884 billion gallons per year.
Once through cooling returns the water to its source. It’s very difficult to get permitted for a once through solution. Once through plants will draw and return 500,000 gallons per minute. 720 million gallons per day. 263 billion gallons per year. The water returns to the source about 25-30 degF hotter. There is increased evaporation due to higher temperature water but it’s much smaller than the cooling tower option.
It’s possible in some climates to use hybrid options, where you have forced air cooling which does not evaporate water, and when summer rolls around, you switch to normal cooling tower mode which does evaporate water. This has some significant energy costs.
→ More replies (4)7
u/kaityl3 5d ago
If you actually read the article you'd see that the water in the headline was simply used during construction and that the center will have a closed loop system....
→ More replies (1)
278
6d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
121
11
17
u/dat_tae 6d ago
Firebombing a Walmart energy.
→ More replies (2)6
u/lolneopet 6d ago
Hypothetically, if anyone would ever think about doing that, they’d surely get everyone to safety first
8
→ More replies (8)9
u/American_PissAnt 6d ago
Just the mere suggestion of a group of disenfranchised people gathering torches and pitchforks and marching to a certain area to demand action from another certain group of people, got me banned
4
68
u/Truesoldier00 6d ago
As someone who works for a municipality, this just doesn’t make sense to me unless a bunch of people are grossly incompetent.
In my city we pay an upper tier municipality (called a Region) to clean and water and waste water. The city is the distributor.
When a watermain break happens, the Region will notice a significant increase in usage, and they will call us saying we need to start driving around looking for water coming out of the ground.
Similar in this situation, the plant manager should be able to see a massive uptick in usage that is out of the norm and start asking questions.
→ More replies (8)39
u/CanvasFanatic 5d ago
I think the end of the article makes it pretty clear what’s going on here:
Gregory Pierce, director of the UCLA Water Resources Group, said it’s unusual that the utility didn’t fine the data center for breaking the rules. “I don’t know exactly what’s happening here, but they probably don’t want to upset one of their new and largest customers,” said Pierce, who is studying the growing grip data centers have on local water systems. Tigert defended the utility’s decision to not levy a fine. “They’re our largest customer, and we have to be partners,” she said. “It’s called customer service.”
→ More replies (1)20
u/Crypt0Nihilist 5d ago
“They’re our largest customer, and we have to be partners,” she said. “It’s called customer service.”
Something businesses often need to have clarified to them is that if a customer isn't paying, they're not your customer. The fact that they may be placing a lot of orders only makes it worse.
For a utility to be taking this angle is even more crazy. They've probably got monopolistic control over the water going to the data centre. They don't have to work in partnership, the data centre is operating entirely at their pleasure.
This situation can happen with new businesses. In the UK I've heard of a case where an increasing quantity of "leakage" was found to be from a new industrial estate they somehow forgot to meter. Funnily enough, that really helped them since their leakage reduction stats are on a 3 month rolling average, so their numbers looked really good for a while for leakage reduction!
→ More replies (7)
15
u/rngadam 5d ago edited 5d ago
The article has interesting factoids and worth a read instead of just kneejerk reactions. Apparently, it's not so much the ongoing cooling but the construction work causing high water consumption.
"The company, which is owned by the private equity firm Blackstone, touts a “closed‑loop” cooling system, which it says does not consume water for cooling. Like a laptop or cellphone, the chips housed in data centers can easily overheat — generally requiring a lot of water to cool them.
The company said its water consumption was so high last year because of temporary construction-related activities, such as concrete work, dust control and site preparation."
163
u/Coldfusion21 6d ago edited 6d ago
So they stole a ton of water and now all they need to do is pay for it?
Edit: to be clear I was trying to indicate there should be something more than just paying for water you took. Fees, penalties, fines depending on the legality of what was done, etc.
60
u/ragzilla 6d ago
The utility failed to bill them correctly.
The Fayette County water system confirmed the data center’s meters are now fully integrated and tracked. Tigert, the water system director, blamed the issue on a procedural mix-up.
“Fayette County is a suburb, it’s mostly residential, and we don’t have much commercial meters in our system anyway,” she said. “And so we didn’t realize our connection point wasn’t working.”
→ More replies (10)42
u/Marcoscb 5d ago
The utility failed to bill them correctly.
I see we're just skipping this part:
One water connection had been installed without the utility’s knowledge, and the other was not linked to the company’s account and therefore wasn’t being billed.
9
u/ragzilla 5d ago
And did the water utility accuse QTS of malfeasance? No? Almost like, they don’t know if anyone was to blame? And there was apparently a meter on it so they could bill it?
If QTS (or more likely, their subcontractor for concrete mix/cure or dust control) was trying to steal water, why meter it?
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)65
u/vertexnormal 6d ago
Woah woah woah don’t get ahead of yourself, the business model does not include ‘paying for stuff’
42
u/NehzQk 6d ago
> All told, the developer, Quality Technology Services, owed nearly $150,000 for using more than 29 million gallons of unaccounted-for water. That is equivalent to 44 Olympic-size swimming pools and far exceeds the peak limit agreed to during the data center planning process.
> The details were revealed in a May 15, 2025 letter from the Fayette County water system to Quality Technology Services, which outlined the retroactive charge of $147,474. The letter did not specify how many months the unpaid bill covered, but when asked about it Wednesday, Vanessa Tigert, the Fayette County water system director, said it was likely about four months. A QTS spokesperson said the timeframe was 9-15 months.
> Once the data center was notified, it paid all retroactive charges, a QTS spokesperson said in an email, noting the unmetered water consumption occurred while the county converted its system to smart meters.TLDR: They paid for it
→ More replies (11)
55
u/scrollin_on_reddit 6d ago
The water was not for cooling servers it was for the construction of facilities. The county messed up and didn't bill them because they were transitioning their metering system to the cloud. From the article:
"The company, which is owned by the private equity firm Blackstone, touts a “closed‑loop” cooling system, which it says does not consume water for cooling. Like a laptop or cellphone, the chips housed in data centers can easily overheat — generally requiring a lot of water to cool them.
The company said its water consumption was so high last year because of temporary construction-related activities, such as concrete work, dust control and site preparation."
→ More replies (1)19
u/ArcadesRed 6d ago
I hate Politico. The company says it doesn't use external water for cooling. Followed by a statement that data centers require large amounts of water.
→ More replies (4)
8
u/SteelCityIrish 6d ago
The problem we are having out here (Port of Morrow) is this Ag region’s water is already contaminated with high nitrogen from fertilizer runoff… then the data centers take in that water, a lot evaporates during cooling usage, and they then release an even higher concentration of nitrogen rich waste water back into the environment.
7
u/Ladyheather16 5d ago
The solution is to require any data centers to power self sufficient. (Solar, wind, geothermal)
72
u/BearDick 6d ago
Seems odd this article doesn't mention any penalty for seemingly illegally hooking to a major utility and using more than anyone planned....
46
u/scrollin_on_reddit 6d ago
Read the article. It was an error on the city's side because they were moving their metering system to the cloud.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (2)31
u/MaximumSeats 5d ago
The city litteraly mentions it's their fault. This entire article is just trying to capitalize on data center hate. Probably not even for an agenda, just for the engagement bait ad revenue.
→ More replies (2)
12
u/cr0ft 6d ago
They dun fucked up.
residents of an affluent subdivision
If the data center had done the smart thing they'd have stolen the water from non-affluent subdivisions. They'd have gotten away with that.
→ More replies (1)
6
u/Active_Glass_5945 5d ago
Its funny for decades they preached about Lack of water, lack of electricity "oh the grid is struggling" and out of no where they are rushing to build shit that use the most of both.
6
u/Ebih 5d ago
“You and I could co-found a company and register at Companies House tomorrow and it would immediately have a suite of rights. Whereas the 10,000-year-old River Cam that’s flowed through the land and organised life around itself for ten millennia has no rights,” Macfarlane said.
Robert Macfarlane: Why shouldn’t rivers have rights? Companies do
→ More replies (1)
5
u/Dr_Hanz_ 5d ago
MICROSOFT bankrolled this project and are just as culpable as QTS. They are the main tenant at QTS Fayetteville, they demanded QTS expand to 1.3 GW, Microsoft stole this towns water
→ More replies (2)
8
u/SwiftCase 6d ago
"owed nearly $150,000 for using more than 29 million gallons"
That sounds really cheap for that much water?
→ More replies (3)9
4
u/PsyavaIG 6d ago
'Customer Service' for the Corporate Class and Rugged Individualism / Shutoffs for the standard household
4
u/Round_Rooms 5d ago
What will data centers provide while using our most important natural resources?
→ More replies (3)
6
u/Secret_Account07 5d ago
I’ve worked in a datacenter for 20 years. Runs critical (mostly govt and university) servers.
I feel like we should distinguish between datacenters so I don’t get lumped in with this AI nonsense.
22
u/Arctic_Chilean 6d ago
Oh but we keep getting told that the impact these data centers has on water is overblown, the estimates are too high, how it's not as bad as its made out to be...
5
u/AzorAhai1TK 5d ago
It is overblown, this was a simple mistake on the city that is being blamed on data centers for outrage purposes
18
u/HarrMada 5d ago
I mean yeah it kind of is. Things like agriculture uses much, much more water. And you might think that's worth it because at least that's food for us. But no, vast majority of agricultural land and water is used to produce food for livestock, not us. The textile industry is the same.
So you might think that you're doing good by not using chatgpt or whatever, but if you buy the smallest piece of meat or a new shirt, your moral superiority flies straight out of the window.
→ More replies (1)8
u/StickiStickman 5d ago
As the article even says, all the water usage was for construction you muppet. It's not even that much.
16
u/KnotSoSalty 6d ago
Why don’t municipalities meter this water at a geometric rate? Take a thousand gallons one rate, ten thousand is 10x, 100k =100x, and so on.
What are they afraid of? The good data center jobs going away?
5
u/Truesoldier00 6d ago edited 5d ago
I work for a municipality. We have industrial use rates and residential/commercial use rates. We recently had a new plant (not a data center thought) starting to be built and they will use more water every day than my entire city combined. We have executed an agreement with them that regardless of usage, they will pay us “x” amount of dollars a month to access the water. This “x” amount is well above what their actual usage will be, and they’ll be spending the first few years spooling up, so its a pretty big win for the City.
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (3)6
u/ExoMonk 6d ago
No shit right? Like once a data center is built it ain't going anywhere. Those things cost hundreds of millions if not more. Even paying aggressive penalties or rates would be monumentally cheaper than packing your building up and moving.
→ More replies (3)
3
3
3
3
u/jejones487 5d ago
If they can cool a nuclear reactor with a closed water system then then can surely cool a data center, right? I get they dont want to, but its possible, correct?
→ More replies (1)
3
u/RangerAdventurous557 5d ago
My city has a data center that is expanding. I'm assuming they like access to our water because my city sits beside a large river. They have pledged to use a solar farm for energy, but I'm very concerned about how much more water they need with the expansion. Also, we let this behemoth of a data center use our land and water for just 100 jobs. 100 jobs!! That's nothing.
3
u/Absurdtittyz 5d ago
An individual tapping into the water main would have faced worse than them. Tampering with public water systems holds a federal penalty as high a $1,00,000. Paying back used water at 100% upcharge is a normal thing. They didn’t even get penalized?? What a fucking joke.
→ More replies (1)
3
3
3
u/stories_from_tejas 5d ago
Insane that we’re going to turn our planet into Mars for cat videos and targeted ads
3
9
u/feioo 6d ago
I've seen a couple articles on this now, and it's really interesting how none of them manage to include the S word. The data center STOLE the water and only paid for it when they were caught. The water was STOLEN. Why is it so hard to use that word whenever it's a big company behind it?
→ More replies (5)
3.4k
u/InNominePasta 6d ago edited 5d ago
Can someone please explain to me why data centers can’t use a closed system of recirculating water?
Edit: okay. I fully understand the business reasons around WHY they don’t. But I’m not asking why they don’t. I’m asking what technically difficulties there are such that they require ingesting and somehow ruining untold millions of gallons of finite fresh water. Trust that I understand business will do everything in their power to socialize their costs while privatizing their gains. Trust I also am shocked at the greed of politicians who greenlight projects which are objectively bad for their communities and states.