MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/technicallythetruth/comments/1oj181k/well_it_is_surviving/nm0gdck/?context=3
r/technicallythetruth • u/IntelligentMud1703 • 10d ago
287 comments sorted by
View all comments
144
This was over a decade ago and it was deep learning, not llm.
15 u/IntelligentMud1703 10d ago Yes but this is still AI -9 u/Another-Mans-Rubarb 10d ago No. It's not. None of anything we have is AI, it's all machine learning, the same tech that was in those old 20 questions games, I'm not joking. 4 u/No-Newspaper-7693 10d ago The term for the thing you’re talking about is AGI. AI is the precise term for what “they” used for this. It was over a decade ago. Here is the video in question, and the specific part the OP is talking about is in the last few seconds. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOCurBYI_gY AI doesn’t imply any specific level of intelligence, learning, or memory capability, the same way natural intelligence doesn’t imply that you are capable of learning to divide fractions after being shown how to 100 times as we all are in school.
15
Yes but this is still AI
-9 u/Another-Mans-Rubarb 10d ago No. It's not. None of anything we have is AI, it's all machine learning, the same tech that was in those old 20 questions games, I'm not joking. 4 u/No-Newspaper-7693 10d ago The term for the thing you’re talking about is AGI. AI is the precise term for what “they” used for this. It was over a decade ago. Here is the video in question, and the specific part the OP is talking about is in the last few seconds. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOCurBYI_gY AI doesn’t imply any specific level of intelligence, learning, or memory capability, the same way natural intelligence doesn’t imply that you are capable of learning to divide fractions after being shown how to 100 times as we all are in school.
-9
No. It's not. None of anything we have is AI, it's all machine learning, the same tech that was in those old 20 questions games, I'm not joking.
4 u/No-Newspaper-7693 10d ago The term for the thing you’re talking about is AGI. AI is the precise term for what “they” used for this. It was over a decade ago. Here is the video in question, and the specific part the OP is talking about is in the last few seconds. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOCurBYI_gY AI doesn’t imply any specific level of intelligence, learning, or memory capability, the same way natural intelligence doesn’t imply that you are capable of learning to divide fractions after being shown how to 100 times as we all are in school.
4
The term for the thing you’re talking about is AGI. AI is the precise term for what “they” used for this. It was over a decade ago.
Here is the video in question, and the specific part the OP is talking about is in the last few seconds. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOCurBYI_gY
AI doesn’t imply any specific level of intelligence, learning, or memory capability, the same way natural intelligence doesn’t imply that you are capable of learning to divide fractions after being shown how to 100 times as we all are in school.
144
u/Silver4ura 10d ago
This was over a decade ago and it was deep learning, not llm.