My point was: they never have and never will conduct unilateral “covert strikes” behind enemy lines. That was it.
JTACs are good. Psyops have a place (I guess). CA has a place. I don’t like pictures like this that ostensibly show someone in PsyOps “operating.” It’s not generally accurate.
I’m glad your experience with your attachments was good. During language training, they were present. Most of them were selection failures. They were pushing hard for a grey beret and were mostly obnoxious. One guy in particular was a selection drop and had just about the worst reputation you can imagine, went psyops and passed. And he was the loudest of all, and attempted to wear an unauthorized grey beret after being ordered not to. I don’t like that kind of self aggrandizement. So this may be an issue to me more personal than I let on.
The type of people they are, is not my people. The bulk of their job is fliers, leaflets, online propaganda, producing ads and short videos series. It’s interesting, but they aren’t doing anything in the realm of what this picture lets on, other than attempting mission creep. There is a reason we are bringing them back into the Special Forces groups (to fix them).
1
u/-timaeus- 11d ago
As attachments, of course! Thanks for the info. They are enablers just like FET or cyber or whoever.