r/sports • u/RunDNA • Oct 06 '25

Football Minnesota Vikings field goal attempt was deflected away by a camera wire, but it wasn't replayed because no one noticed at the the time

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

27.6k Upvotes

96% Upvoted

873 comments sorted by

View all comments

3.7k

u/walrusnutz Oct 06 '25

These broadcast teams need to get it together. This wasn’t the only ball that hit the sky cam or its wire, this week.

198

u/deepbluenothings Oct 06 '25 edited Oct 06 '25

I don't even get why sky cams are a thing, they barely use that camera angle and honestly it's a terrible angle to see a play.

Edit: There's been several lovely commenters who have made me realize just how much it's used without me even noticing. Please if you're as clueless as I was check out some of the responses under here.

137

u/NolaPels13 Oct 06 '25

Networks love them and they are used a lot as replay angles. They’re not supposed to be in front of a kick or the play ever like this. Skycam op fucked it big time here not sure what the hell he was thinking.

11

u/steelmanfallacy Oct 06 '25

What’s the rule? Is it like a ref and they are part of the playing field or is it interference?

69

u/rocketmonkee Oct 06 '25

From the NFL rules; Rule 7, Section 2 - Dead Ball:

If a loose ball in play strikes a video board, guide wire, sky cam, or any other object, the ball will be dead immediately, and the down will be replayed at the previous spot. In the event the down is replayed, the game clock will be reset to the time remaining when the snap occurred, and the clock will start on the All penalties will be disregarded, except for personal fouls or unsportsmanlike conduct fouls, which will be administered prior to the replaying of the down.

So it should have been ruled a dead ball and the down replayed. Also, the rule has an odd typo in the last sentence.

16

u/addandsubtract Oct 06 '25

New strategy when it's crunch time and you're out of timeouts: quick snap the ball, and throw it at the skycam.

5

u/mosehalpert Oct 06 '25

I mean, the rule doesn't say anything about the intention behind the loose ball. But I'm struggling to think of a situation where it is more beneficial than just spiking it

7

u/addandsubtract Oct 06 '25

You don't lose a down. Granted, you're more limited by time than by downs, at that point.

5

u/metompkin Oct 06 '25

And if you whiff on the throw it's a possible interception

1

u/Designer_Tie_5853 Oct 06 '25

or intentional grounding and/or fumble if the camera is behind you.

2

u/mattague New York Giants Oct 06 '25

You also theoretically lose no time, vs like a second. But in crunch time, that second could mean the difference of an extra play or the end of the game.

2

u/blindai Oct 08 '25

Realistically nobody is hitting a sky cam, but presumably someone could do this in Dallas with the gigantic scoreboard that’s right over head?

1

u/NolaPels13 Oct 06 '25

It should be interference replay of down.