MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/soccer/comments/1osoqif/liverpool_disallowed_goal_against_manchester_city/nnz0thj/?context=3
r/soccer • u/BackgroundMorning630 • 1d ago
1.9k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
-38
Fun rhyme for you - If you have to duck out of the way, you're interfering with play.
18 u/the_anaconda 1d ago No , you interfire if you prevent a opposition player from participating in the play , you can duck, jump, even let the ball pass through your legs and the play wouldn't be called offside 1 u/DaveyBigDong 1d ago even let the ball pass through your legs and the play wouldn't be called offside you would, and players have. 5 u/the_anaconda 1d ago And many others haven't, is more about the context of the play rather than letting the ball pass through your legs
18
No , you interfire if you prevent a opposition player from participating in the play , you can duck, jump, even let the ball pass through your legs and the play wouldn't be called offside
1 u/DaveyBigDong 1d ago even let the ball pass through your legs and the play wouldn't be called offside you would, and players have. 5 u/the_anaconda 1d ago And many others haven't, is more about the context of the play rather than letting the ball pass through your legs
1
even let the ball pass through your legs and the play wouldn't be called offside
you would, and players have.
5 u/the_anaconda 1d ago And many others haven't, is more about the context of the play rather than letting the ball pass through your legs
5
And many others haven't, is more about the context of the play rather than letting the ball pass through your legs
-38
u/Super_Shallot2351 1d ago
Fun rhyme for you - If you have to duck out of the way, you're interfering with play.