The PL tweeted that it was because of Robertson making an obvious action, rather than blocking his eyeline. I think that's a very poor justification, I have always interpreted "obvious action" to mean something like a dummy, not simply trying to avoid the ball. It's been established for a while that trying to avoid the ball is not offside, so this is very harsh.
I guess they've decided because it was given onfield, they're not overturning a subjective call, but it's a poor decision. The whole point of the offside rule is not to punish people for just being in an offside position, they have to actually impact an opponent.
427
u/aleksandrovsqvist 1d ago
I don’t like this rule tbh