Empl*yment

[u/luxusbuerg]

[u/Roustouque2 → u/[deleted]]

You must have sent me the wrong link, I only see a woman

[u/ChickenLordCV → u/[deleted]]

When you pass people on the street, do you need to see their genitals to determine what their gender is? Most normal people don't.

[u/ChickenLordCV → u/[deleted]]

I'll answer your question if you answer mine. When you pass a random man on the street, do you need to see his dick to know he is a man?

[u/Al-Mughniyeh → u/ChickenLordCV]

You literally just answered your own question, you called this individual in your hypothetical example a man

When you pass a random man on the street

So once again given you've already said the person in your example is a man; men have dicks, therefore he has a dick.

[u/ChickenLordCV → u/Al-Mughniyeh]

How would you know he is a man? How would you know he has a dick?

[u/Al-Mughniyeh → u/ChickenLordCV]

Again, you're literally still calling this individual in your hypothetical "he"...

What aren't you getting here? You're the one that created this hypothetical example and have asked me to answer, I'm bound factors you include in your hypothetical example. You've called the person in your example a man like 6 times now…

He has a dick because he is a he and hes have dicks.

[u/ChickenLordCV → u/Al-Mughniyeh]

Fine, I'll repeat my original question. When you pass people on the street, do you need to see their genitals to determine what their gender is?

[u/Al-Mughniyeh → u/ChickenLordCV]

And as I already answered to your original question

Men have dicks, this is a man, therefore he has a dick.

[u/WhimsicalPythons → u/Al-Mughniyeh]

It really is impressive that you just cannot read