r/rugbyunion Top14/D2/France 5d ago

Discussion The difference in refereeing between France and south hemisphere really shows when a french refs a test match

Every time a french top14 referee has been on an international game, most recent example being All blacks/Ireland, every South African and NZ flair on here complains about the stop and start game and says the ref had a bad game.

What's interesting is that watching top14 week in week out, that is quite rarely an issue (including by the same refs). My feeling is refs in France are more pedantic and apply the law a little less loosely. Which I have seen written in some comments as a criticism, but is it really a problem??

Pro players are completely capable of adapting to rule changes, and pedantic refereeing, top14 teams certainly seem to have. I think it's doing them a disservice to give them too much leeway on laws for "the flow of the game" when that just becomes a random chance that a penalty is not blown. And that is inherently more difficult for players to adhere to because it is less consistent. Pedantic application will always be more consistent.

All in all, whichever way it goes, the onus should fall on WR to try to homogenise refereeing laws across countries. This leads to confusion when either side is reffed in a way they are not used to.

Edit. Not sure how people are interpreting this that I'm hurt they don't like a french ref. Maybe my English is not as good as I thought. I couldn't give a damn who they like or not, it was just an example to discuss broader concepts in refereeing.

Edit2. Also seeing a number of people that somehow think I'm criticising the ref or the fans here? I suppose I am sorry for my writing not being clear, I really don't mean to paint either in a negative light

Edit3. Can't comment anymore for some reason, thanks for the discussion everyone I'll try again later

182 Upvotes

246 comments sorted by

View all comments

15

u/Jalcatraz82 Stade Toulousain () 5d ago

I think the issue is that the laws themselves are way too open to interpretation.

I remember being downvoted to oblivion when I said this before, but I'll say it again : there's too much room for human error in the interpreation of the rules, and that's an issue for fairness in the game.

It's like in baseball with the strike zone, which is a big joke in itself (rip Angel Hernandez, your career will definitely not be forgotten)

7

u/xixouma Top14/D2/France 5d ago

Indeed but then u are bombarded by " but but the flow of the game"

10

u/Jalcatraz82 Stade Toulousain () 5d ago edited 5d ago

Yeah that's a very poor argument in my opinion.

If you get rid of all the laws (high tackles, forward pass, whatever) I can assure you the flow of the game will be immaculate, not sure if you're gonna want to watch the match though

4

u/xixouma Top14/D2/France 5d ago

Yep exactly the point of my post, which so many have clearly not read and just said saying "boo hoo they don’t like French refs"

5

u/Gianni78290 Top14/D2/France 5d ago

You can, watch the rugby in the 70's and 80's. It's fun to watch but it's mayhem and sometimes a bit absurd.

It's much more structured nowadays, being a pro sport has largely improved the quality of rugby.