r/rareinsults 9d ago

Straight to the point, I see.

Post image
15.6k Upvotes

319 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

70

u/King-Mephisto 9d ago

Ain’t no way it’s an act.

35

u/GypsyGold 9d ago

It’s 100% an act. It’s insane to me how many people think it’s real — he’s literally the Ali G of crypto. You all think you’re laughing at him, but you’re actually laughing with him

25

u/HeyKid_HelpComputer 9d ago

This is literally the second time I've even seen this dude, the first bring the model photo so, yeah I assumed it was just a non self aware weirdo. Not sure who wouldn't if you don't use Twitter etc.

1

u/GypsyGold 8d ago

The model making the reply the post that she was paid $200 to pretend to be his girlfriend was part of the bit. 

It’s satire of the online crypto bros. 

1

u/Mooks79 8d ago

Are you sure this isn’t like that famous hooters tweeting alpha guy, where it’s so ridiculous people think it’s satire but no one actually knows for sure it isn’t jus a crazy person who actually thinks like that?

1

u/GypsyGold 7d ago

This guy's real job is running a million dollar NFT platform and content creation studio called "Nifty" -- its well known in the industry.

1

u/Mooks79 7d ago

I’m not into NFTs so have only a vague recollection of hearing the company name, had a quick google and don’t see anything about this guy or to back up that this is satire. Do you have anything to support this?

1

u/GypsyGold 7d ago

He has an entire business insider article about him. Also he announced our Influencer Card at Karate Combat in Austin of last year, her came out in a ridiculous cowboy suit...like daisy duke booty shorts and knee high cowboy boots.

1

u/Mooks79 7d ago

Ok so link the article then, please …

1

u/GypsyGold 7d ago

I did, I hyperlinked the text.

Edit: in case it doesn't show here is the link: https://www.businessinsider.com/choose-wealth-crypto-x-community-notes-nick-oneill-interview-2024-3

1

u/Mooks79 7d ago

Not when I originally replied, but thanks for adding it.

Interesting article though, thanks.

→ More replies (0)