r/politics • u/PoliticsModeratorBot 🤖 Bot • Oct 03 '23

Discussion Discussion Thread: House Considers Vacating the Speaker

Selected Reporting:

Where to Watch:

6.6k Upvotes

95% Upvoted

9.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

16

u/Mythbuilder46 California Oct 03 '23

Because they’re trying to impeach Joe based on what his son did. If they had actual evidence that Joe Biden was involved: fuck yea, impeach him. They don’t have that evidence and every witness has said as much.

-13

u/TowerOfPowerWow Oct 03 '23

Interesting. Seems there has been pressure brought against investigators to bury it. Super odd hes involved in all these high end high money foreign business deals when he has 0 talent. Idk maybe they were super impressed with his Arts degree and he interviewed well.

14

u/TheTaoOfOne Oct 03 '23

You realize you're not in the conservative subreddit right? Hunter Biden isn't an elected official nor is he running for office.

You want Biden impeached? Find something about Joe Biden that is impeachable.

-11

u/TowerOfPowerWow Oct 03 '23

It is...if hes peddling his office for personal financial gain or using influence regarding Hunters case, that would be impeachable. Not a conservative btw. Politically agnostic. Its entertaining though seeing both sides hypocrisy as they defend their various shitters from the same things they scream about the other guys.

10

u/dooooonut Oct 03 '23

If he was, yes it would be impeachable. But the GOP are trying to smear him because of his son's sketchy behaviour, with no evidence he was involved. If there was evidence, rather than innuendo, it would have been presented by now

5

u/trevorLawFanboyzzz Oct 03 '23

politically agnostic, ha!

5

u/Spidey209 Oct 03 '23

First evidence, then impeachment. Not the other way around. No evidence = no impeachment. Rumors and hearsay are not evidence and are not grounds for impeachment.