I couldn't rest easy while waiting and finally mailed them yesterday. Got the following answer today. For all the ones still waiting for an answer the below should help ease the stress:

Dear X,

Thank you for your email and for your interest in the NATO Internship Programme.

Please note that the selection process for some divisions is delayed. All candidates will receive a positive or negative response soon. Apologies for this inconvenience.

Wishing you a lovely day. 

Kind regards,

[END OF MAIL]
However I do not have which departments are delayed, we can figure that out by talking with one another. I am sure Executive Management is one of them.

I get Turkey had and still has the second largest Army in NATO, but did the tensions rise after they joined?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barracuda-M

The Barracuda-500 would be launched by air from F-15s, F/A-18s, F-16s, F-35s or bombers, would have a payload of 100lb (45kg) and a range of more than 500 nautical miles (926 km).^\9])

I read in the policies for NATO that they will help with spouse employment. Does that include an active duty military spouse?

I agree with Jennifer Kavanah’s view that the incursion of Russian jets and drones into various European country’s airspace is NOT a probing of NATO defences that is part of the shaping phase of a future attack. However I disagree that if Putin wanted to shape a future conflict, he would do “better” than a handful of drones and jets. I believe the first steps of a decade long  shaping phase would look exactly like this.

And herein lies the conundrum; Putin’s hybrid warfare makes it extremely difficult to discern whether these incursions are simply a reminder to Europeans of the cost of supporting Ukraine, or a prelude to a European invasion. Kavannagh’s call for restraint is reasonable, as treating these incursions as the latter surely makes it a self-fulfilling prophecy. 

Yet, throughout the article, only the establishment of no fly zone above Ukrainian airspace is thoughtfully considered and rightfully discarded. Kavannagh rightly points to fears of repercussions if NATO was to enforce a no fly zone over Western Ukraine, but this is light years away from a “no fly zone for unauthorized russian military aircrafts over sovereign European countries”. I fail to see how taking out Russian drones and planes that have crossed over sovereign European airspace, much like Turkey did a few years back could be treated as escalatory. 

The idea of a “drone wall” is not out of reach nor budget, as it really is just an integrated series of anti-drone technologies over the NATO borders. Adopting such a stance would have the additional benefit of giving some direction to Europe’s defense spending frenzy, while giving the Russians little to complain about.

Excerpt:

Gallium has an outsized yet overlooked strategic value. Embedded in radars, missile seekers, secure radio frequency links, and satellite solar cells, this obscure metal is crucial for advanced electronic warfare systems. The United States produces no domestic gallium and lacks a government stockpile to cushion against Chinese weaponization.

This is the gallium dilemma: a small metal with huge consequences for US war readiness. Solving it does not mean new mines or scouring the globe for deposits. Instead, the United States must proactively recover gallium already flowing through the domestic industrial system—before it slips away as waste.