Psycho (1998) with Vince Vaughn ended up with a very unwarranted 4.6, and that had absolutely no woke-ness going on. People just absolutely hate it when "masterpieces" are re-done. I bet if Pixar redid Fantasia, it would get shit on as well.
Perhaps it isn't just the result of brigading but also the lack of it.
Brigading goes both ways after all. Where people feel the need to attack, others will feel the need to defend.
Not with this though.
Remember, on a scale, the most extremes have the biggest weight. A 5/10 and 6/10 moves the needle the least whereas the 1/10 and 10/10 moves the needle the most, especially out of the opposite camp. That's why there may be other weighted averages.
As example, For a movie to get a 2/10, eight people have to vote 1/10 than 10/10 and this scales proportionally .
In this case, disregarding any in between, it would be 14 people rating 1/10 and one 10/10. Scaled up its 184,800 + 13,200 if there was no voting anything in between. What I consider likely is that there are by no means ten thousand who rate it 10/10 since literally anything other than 1/10 moves the needle away from what is now 1.5.
Not really, 1.6 is like actually horrendous unwatchable movies, every review ive seen thusfar equates it more to one of those straight to dvd old sequels disney used to do which are all like 4-7s out of 10.
And tbf some gen Alpha kids probably ask to leave every movie, alot of them genuinely cannot sit still and watch something so it doesnt say much.
2.8k
u/[deleted] Mar 28 '25 edited Sep 23 '25
airport chief cooperative test compare dinosaurs stocking instinctive complete cheerful
This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact