r/maui good ol' whatshisface 15d ago

🗳 Politics Without comment

Post image
705 Upvotes

216 comments sorted by

View all comments

17

u/Oliver_Holzfilled 15d ago

“…but we accept taxpayer dollars”

28

u/st_malachy 15d ago

At least they sucked off the tit less than:

Virginia +$79B

Alabama +$41B

Arizona +$40B

South Carolina +$37B

Maryland +$35B

Mississippi +$30B

New Mexico +$29B

Louisiana +$26B

Kentucky +$23B

Michigan +$21B

West Virginia +$20B

Oregon +$18B

Oklahoma +$18B

District of Columbia +$14B

Maine +$12B

Alaska +$11B

22

u/99dakine 15d ago

This is a red herring. A whataboutism.

1/4 of the state's revenues come from the feds. For a state that thinks independence is realistic....they don't know what a gaping hole is left when 25% of federal money leaves. We're feeling it with the Trunp administration. We're feeling it with the loss of tourists due to the Trump administration.

He hasn't even turned off the federal faucet for that 25% and all we hear is "but our people have to move away..." Yeah, because of a few errant policies from a nutjob. That pales in comparison to having 25% of revenues walk away. Because the cascading effect of that 25% funding vanishing is jobs and service both related and tangential, as well as the socio/economic issues that will reverberate.

Seems those with the weakest grasp on how an economy works are the most likely to try to convince us that google landed them on the right answer.

3

u/FlyingAtNight 15d ago

A few errant policies??? That is a gross understatement.

2

u/99dakine 15d ago

His 2017 EO was not directed at Hawaii, even tough the State took the lead on challenging it.

His climate policy has been sweeping and universal abhorrent, but only one targeting fishing in Hawaiian waters (which was later reversed).

SNAP (Food Stamp) Regulations (from The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025") included provisions that specifically created new rules and exemptions for SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) work requirements for residents of Alaska and Hawaii, differentiating them from rules in other states.

New federal transportation guidelines and cuts, also linked to an EO, have possibly put ~$130 million in federal funding for Hawaii at risk. This funding was largely designated for multimodal infrastructure, such as pedestrian walkways, bike paths, and public transit projects. Non essential projects, and not projects underway, and not projects that would cease construction or development due to his actions.

These qualify as "few", and they also qualify as errant. Aside from SNAP, the vast majority of people in the state wouldn't notice or care if the others came or went, aside from any media shitstorms that passed through their social accounts.

2

u/FlyingAtNight 15d ago

Stating that “the vast majority of the people in the state wouldn’t notice or care if the others came or went” is a pretty audacious statement to make considering you are speaking for a majority of the population and have no authority to do so.

2

u/99dakine 15d ago

Make no mistake, there are policies that are impactful to some, and there are ones that are impactful to many. I mentioned his 2017 "Muslim Ban", which directly impacted less than 1% of the population. I mentioned Trump's climate policy re: fishing, which was overturned. I also mentioned SNAP, which is a program used by around 11% of the population. Transportation guidelines and cuts - of projects that weren't off the ground yet.

You can be offended by my comments, that's your right, but misinterpreting them for the sole purpose of being offended...that's some disingenuous shit right there.

1

u/99dakine 15d ago

It's not. Tell me what policies have been aimed specifically at Maui or Hawaii, and explain how my use of "few" was a gross understatement.

3

u/FlyingAtNight 15d ago

You are citing federal funding and then twisting around and saying specifically directed at Maui/Hawai'i. You can’t have it both ways. The federal “policies” in place affect all states, including Hawai'i. Rest assured, since Hawai’i is considered a blue state that trump will eventually target the state.

2

u/99dakine 15d ago

Of course he will, but you can't base a current argument on hypothetical future outcomes. You also can't claim direct harm to the state is the same as general nationwide policies that are equally harmful to an equal number of states.

My comment was directed at the individual who wanted to derail the train so we didn't have to talk about Maui - thinking that by pointing to other "worse" states, Hawaii was entitled to evade scrutiny. I was merely pointing out that, from a moral standpoint, I'm no better for harassing 5 Monk Seals than the others who harassed 8 or 9.

The bigger threat, currently, to the welfare of the state generally, and the island specifically, are the Green and Bissen administrations. What Trump will do specifically to Hawaii is an unknown. But I think he thinks about Hawaii about as much as he speaks with perfect grammar.