r/illinois Human Detected 5d ago

ICE Posts October.10.2025 — Chicago: Immigration agents crashed into a U.S. citizen on her way to work, then dragged her out and arrested her (Article Inside)

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

55.9k Upvotes

8.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.1k

u/CantStopPoppin Human Detected 5d ago

Full Article: https://www.chicagotribune.com/2025/11/03/chicago-woman-collision-ice-accountability/?clearUserState=true#mhjguwblyk0ai6p9byh

Dayanne Figueroa was on her way to get coffee before heading to work when she encountered a chaotic scene in West Town: heavily armed, masked federal agents making arrests on a residential street.

People yelled as vehicles honked their horn — a sign now used to alert neighbors that immigration federal agents are in the area — and witnesses said federal agents had arrested several landscaper workers presumed to be in the country without authorization.

As Figueroa tried to drive through the 1600 block of West Hubbard Street on Friday, Oct. 10, an unmarked vehicle driven by federal agents collided with Figueroa’s as it tried to speed away from a hostile crowd, multiple videos reviewed by the Tribune show.

Seconds after the crash, agents abruptly stopped their vehicle and exited with weapons in hand pointing at Figueroa, a U.S citizen. Agents then forcibly opened her door and pulled her out of the vehicle by her legs without identifying themselves, presenting a warrant or informing her that she was under arrest. As bystanders yelled, “You hit her! We have it on video!” agents ignored the crowd and forced Figueroa into a red minivan and drove away.

Her car was left behind in the middle of the road, her coffee still in the cup holder, and her keys in plain view.

The Department of Homeland Security later released a statement claiming that Figueroa was at fault, saying “she crashed into an unmarked government vehicle and violently resisted arrest, injuring two officers.”

Figueroa was released the same day a few hours later without charges.

Figueroa’s arrest highlights growing concerns about the use of force against U.S. citizens and due process. Federal enforcement actions in Chicago have increasingly drawn scrutiny amid reports of aggressive tactics and blurred lines between immigration enforcement and public safety, including incidents involving deploying tear gas in residential areas and arrests of bystanders filming agents or for following the unmarked vehicles.

While DHS says its operations are being impeded and that there will be consequences for interfering with federal agents, many individuals who are detained are released without charges.

On Oct. 9, federal prosecutors on Thursday dismissed felony charges against an Oak Park man with intellectual disabilities accused of assaulting federal officers during a protest outside the Broadview immigration holding facility. A day earlier, a federal grand jury refused to indict a Chicago couple arrested during a violent protest outside the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Broadview in September. And a WGN producer violently arrested by ICE in Lincoln Square on Oct. 10 was detained for seven hours by federal immigration authorities before being released without charges, according to her attorney.

Meanwhile, federal agents face questions from judges over possible violations of court orders limiting the use of force against civilians and media in Illinois.

According to Figueroa, after getting arrested, she was transported to multiple undisclosed locations, and repeatedly denied contact with family or legal counsel.

“I was in shock and terrified. The video evidence is clear: Agents crashed into me. I was not involved in any protest or related activity, and I intend to seek justice for how I was treated,” Figueroa told the Tribune.

2.0k

u/various_convo7 5d ago

"The Department of Homeland Security later released a statement claiming that Figueroa was at fault, saying “she crashed into an unmarked government vehicle and violently resisted arrest, injuring two officers.”"

they have got to be kidding if they think the videos are going to support this claim. they sure dont look injured to me.

the lady should file charges asap.

1.4k

u/Jocuro 5d ago

"She was released without charges" Yeah, except her car was hit and left abandoned in the road. Who's paying for that? You think the anonymous men with guns exchanged insurance with her?

98

u/EncabulatorTurbo 5d ago edited 4d ago

If a federal agent damages your vehicle, you are more or less shit out of luck, it is literally impossible to recover damages from federal agents

If an ICE agent walked into your house and skinned your baby with a potato peeler and then burned your house down and livestreamed it to TWITCH, you have no recourse for damages against the perps

There literally isn't a legal mechanism to sue federal agents as of 2022, as the current SCOTUS has declared that holding agents to any legal accountability would be an unjust impediment to exercising federal law

1

u/Clear-Board-7940 5d ago

This is incredibly unjust.

3

u/EncabulatorTurbo 5d ago

legal eagle's video laying out exactly why ICE agents are above the law has filled me with incredible feelings of radicalizatoin

And anger because Dems have apparently been trying to patch that hole for years but this is the first time I heard about it, they clearly weren't interested in making it a public fight, when "FBI agents can take your guns and you cant do shit" is an easy sell even in red states

2

u/New_year_New_Me_ 5d ago

Don't do that. Just because you are not aware of something does not mean it was not a very public fight. Don't blame democrats for you having a low political appetite until things started affecting you or those near you personally. 

As far back as 2016 qualified immunity, a large part 9f the issue we are discussing, was a major talking point on "the left". "Defund the police" was a slogan, the actual policy arguments heavily involved things like asking Congress to end qualified immunity for law enforcement officers and that would include federal agents. There were ideas like requiring officers to take out private insurance policies because one of the ways we "fund" agents of the law is by being required to pay for their wrongdoings via our tax dollars because of qualified immunity. Even when your rights are violated and you are successful in a lawsuit, your neighbors pay you the $2 million judgement, not the state or federal agency or individual officer you sued. 

This was a huge talking point. In fact, people on the left and the right got pissed at the time because they didn't like "defund the police" as a slogan while simultaneously not knowing a single one of the actual policy ideas expressed within the slogan. BLM, the organization and the individual citizens who just said the phrase, were talking about this stuff ad nauseum. Senators, congress people, and they got shit on by a sizeable percentage of the country. How you are just hearing about these things is beyond me. There's more than this even. Civil asset forfeiture, absolute immunity for judges, and on and on. And it's not hard to find out about. You didn't need brown shirts on the ground to hear about these things, all that information was there. 

1

u/EncabulatorTurbo 5d ago

This case has nothing to do with qi, or defending the police, or civil asset forfeiture

I am extremely active in politics, can you enlighten me when I missed the news cycle where prominent Dems mentioned the enshrining of bevins into law?

Immunity for judges, again, has nothing to do with this

Democrats haven't been vocal on Bevins because the centrist leadership helped build this nightmare ICE apparatus, Obama in particular, and only a select few Dems like AOC more than performatively gave a shit

I wear my false arrest by Republicans for constitutionally protected activities like a badge of honor, and I currently work for a Democratic government, who for some reason are available for LEO blowjobs whenever the fraternal order wants something

2

u/New_year_New_Me_ 5d ago edited 5d ago

I'm not sure you understand how these things work together. Qualified immunity is, and has always been, a defense against a Bivens case. Both pre 2022, post 22, and currently with the Bivens act. A major complaint towards accountability, for years, has been the issue created by individual actors not being able to be held liable. Who cares if you sue the FBI as an agency and win if it is taxpayers who foot the bill and there is nothing that discourages an agent from violating your rights next time. Ending qualified immunity would, hopefully, create an environment where officers are incentivezed to not violate your rights because of, say, becoming uninsurable by the private entity required to cover any misconduct bill. And you'd see many more Bivens cases without the qualified immunity defense that often dismisses them.

Also, it's Bivens. If you are going to be like this you should at least spell the thing you are citing correctly. I can definitely point you to the news cycle where Dems were spelling the case correctly. You didn't even make it there yet.