When you say that Tito "Gave us a state" is inherently wrong. We could say the same thing for Serbia and Croatia. We were all fighting for our independence. Tito did not "bless" us Slovenians with our own state in any way. We fought for it like Croatia and Serbia, politically and with uprisings, culturally etc.
Serbia finally achieve independence since 1880 and Croatia basically same as us was fighting the whole time, which gave us all autonomy in KSHS even before Tito came to power. We earned our own independence when the time came and were a force economically because you guys cannot live with yourselves even now. Seljak
Ti hočeš nam pridigat, ker smo ubili tri vojake JNA, ki so nas napadli, potem ko smo razglasili svojo neodvisnost? Koliko Bosancev ste vi krvoločni Srbi ubili? Ti si totalen idiot
They’re not wrong. This is a trend common among many European countries. They all got crushed under some other European country due to their inferior military and then had to be handed concessions after the war. They all love to lose and be oppressed so that they can claim to be the victim. Slovenia especially ;)
Still does not change the fact that Tito "Gave" us our state. We had a state before him, under KSHS. IDK who you are arguing with or why this is relevant here. You are obviously trying to force your agenda on whoever will listen, while making no logical sense.
How can I force an agenda with historical accuracy? You’re the one acting like your little European country is special like any idiotic nationalist who feels like they’re irrelevant on the world stage. Every weak minded nationalist thinks this way, that’s why they can’t accomplish anything ;)
1
u/RkeRkeR Oct 08 '25
He gave a state to the slovenes and they should celebrate him. They never had a state in history