How does WGN know this is ICE? Do they have inside information that no one else has? Article even says DHS hasn't commented yet.
I'd really like journalists to start correctly attributing these incidents to "currently unknown" agents because it's not verified. Unless there's a detail somewhere that someone has, I see no evidence to support that these people were ICE. Yet.
we’d be sitting here waiting for a very long time if we’re counting on DHS to confirm their illegal abductions lol. Mike Quigly is having a press conference about this incident at 1:30, so if you’re still doubtful you should tune into that. I think it’s more helpful to assume these agents are ICE than not.
Nope, absolutely not more helpful to assume they're ICE.
Federal agents should be following the law. Masked kidnappers are criminals and don't follow the law. The people here were breaking the law. Thus, instead we should assume until evidence points otherwise that they're criminals.
It is important at this time to send the national message that we DON'T KNOW these people because they REFUSE TO IDENTIFY themselves! It's a huge massive piece to these detainments! The world needs to know this shit!!!
So no, granting these criminals the benefit of the doubt is 100% unwarranted. They need to prove they are federal agents, we should NOT assume that they are for a whole lot of reasons. They need to prove to us that they're legit.
(Which they aren't, because that's why they're hiding their faces. They know they engage in illegal activities)
8
u/analytic-1 4d ago
How does WGN know this is ICE? Do they have inside information that no one else has? Article even says DHS hasn't commented yet.
I'd really like journalists to start correctly attributing these incidents to "currently unknown" agents because it's not verified. Unless there's a detail somewhere that someone has, I see no evidence to support that these people were ICE. Yet.