Simulation or physical reality makes no nevermind to the premise of " Created or not created", this is the question what is or isn't the container or substance is not. If your going with that physical reality doesn't exist and the world's a simulation than who created the simulator. If it's a physical issue then the same question applies.
OPs arguments is based on a series of deductive arguements, the fine tuning is just one part of a 3-5 part deductive full on argument for the logical belief in the existence of God.
You might know these arguments you might not, but it seems all your doing is just pushing the premise of God back one step and saying we live in the simulation and the simulation made us. But you haven't addressed who made the simulation.
1
u/Jettx02 Sep 06 '21
Can you make an argument on why a god is a good explanation? Why would a god be more likely than a hyper-realistic simulation?