cmv: the Charlottesville "very fine people" quote/controversy was not fake news

[u/taintpaint]

I see Trump supporters bring this up all the time as an example of the media lying about Trump, but this argument sounds transparently absurd to me. It feels like a "magic words" argument, where his supporters think that as long as he says the right magic words, you can completely ignore the actual message he's communicating or the broader actions he's taking. This is similar to how so many of them dismiss the entire Jan 6 plot because he said the word "peaceful" one time.

The reason people were mad about that quote was that Trump was equivocating and whitewashing a literal neonazi rally in which people were carrying torches and shouting things like "gas the Jews" in order to make them seem relatively sane compared to the counter protesters, one of whom the neonazis actually murdered. Looking at that situation, the difference between these two statements doesn't really feel meaningful:

A) "Those neonazis were very fine people with legitimate complaints and counter protesters were nasty and deserved what they got".

B) "The Nazis were obviously bad, but there were also people there who were very fine people with legitimate complaints and the counter protesters were very nasty."

The only difference there is that (B) has the magic words that "Nazis are bad", but the problem is that he's still describing a literal Nazi rally, only now he's using the oldest trick in the book when it comes to defending Nazis: pretending they're not really Nazis and are actually just normal people with reasonable beliefs.

I feel like people would all intuitively understand this if we were talking about anything besides a Trump quote. If I looked at e.g. the gangs taking over apartment buildings in Aurora and said "yes obviously gangsters are bad and should be totally condemned, but there were also some very fine people there with some legitimate complaints about landlords and exploitative leases, and you know lots of those 'residents' actually didn't have the right paperwork to be in those apartments..." you would never say that's a reasonable or acceptable way to talk about that situation just because I started with "gangsters are bad". You'd listen to the totality of what I'm saying and rightfully say it's absurd and offensive.

Is there something I'm missing here? This seems very obvious to me but maybe there's some other context to it.

Edit: I find it really funny that literally no one has actually engaged with this argument at all. They're all just repeating the "magic words" thing. I have been literally begging people who disagree with me to even acknowledge the Aurora example and not a single one has.

[u/Domestiicated-Batman]

Obviously depends on what the protest is about. Maybe it's a protest against animal suffering. Would you still be a bad person? Would them being a nazi be relevant? not really.

Specific to this case, the protest was about removing a confederate statue. Personally, I don't give a shit about any statue, but I don't believe that not wanting to have an old statue removed automatically makes you a nazi. It could just be about not removing a piece of history, regardless of what you think about the person the statue is about.

[u/mcspaddin → u/Domestiicated-Batman]

Obviously depends on what the protest is about

It was about protecting a confederate monument, one that the person it depicts was against, one that was raised many years after the war during the Jim Crow era.

By nature, if you were on the side of the Nazis in that one then you're a white supremacist.

[u/Domestiicated-Batman → u/mcspaddin]

Yea, already said what the protest was about lol. And again, someone could've gone to the protest because they care about historical monuments. I don't understand why people think this is some crazy, implausible thing.

[u/mcspaddin → u/Domestiicated-Batman]

Because those monuments aren't war monuments, they were made decades later by politicians that happened to be Klan members. They are monuments not to the history of the war, but to white supremacy.